Drug Manufacturers - General
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
AMGN vs BMY vs GILD vs PFE
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Drug Manufacturers - General
Drug Manufacturers - General
Drug Manufacturers - General
AMGN vs BMY vs GILD vs PFE — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Drug Manufacturers - General | Drug Manufacturers - General | Drug Manufacturers - General | Drug Manufacturers - General |
| Market Cap | $177.59B | $114.85B | $166.40B | $150.63B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $37.24B | $48.48B | $29.73B | $63.31B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $7.80B | $7.28B | $9.22B | $7.49B |
| Gross Margin | 71.5% | 68.7% | 63.0% | 69.3% |
| Operating Margin | 31.6% | 25.7% | 38.2% | 23.4% |
| Forward P/E | 14.7x | 8.9x | 15.7x | 8.9x |
| Total Debt | $54.60B | $47.14B | $24.59B | $67.42B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $9.13B | $10.21B | $7.56B | $1.14B |
AMGN vs BMY vs GILD vs PFE — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Amgen Inc. (AMGN) | 100 | 143.3 | +43.3% |
| Bristol-Myers Squib… (BMY) | 100 | 94.2 | -5.8% |
| Gilead Sciences, In… (GILD) | 100 | 172.2 | +72.2% |
| Pfizer Inc. (PFE) | 100 | 73.1 | -26.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: AMGN vs BMY vs GILD vs PFE
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
AMGN is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 9.9%, EPS growth 88.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 11.8%
- 156.4% 10Y total return vs GILD's 87.8%
- 9.9% revenue growth vs PFE's -1.6%
BMY is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night and defensive is your priority.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.50, current ratio 1.26x
- Beta 0.50, yield 4.4%, current ratio 1.26x
- Lower P/E (8.9x vs 8.9x)
- Beta 0.50 vs GILD's 0.66
GILD carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for valuation efficiency.
- PEG 0.15 vs AMGN's 5.01
- 31.0% margin vs PFE's 11.8%
- +38.8% vs AMGN's +22.8%
- 16.1% ROA vs PFE's 3.6%, ROIC 23.4% vs 7.5%
PFE is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 15 yrs, beta 0.54, yield 6.5%
- 6.5% yield, 15-year raise streak, vs AMGN's 2.9%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 9.9% revenue growth vs PFE's -1.6% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (8.9x vs 8.9x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 31.0% margin vs PFE's 11.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.50 vs GILD's 0.66 | |
| Dividends | 6.5% yield, 15-year raise streak, vs AMGN's 2.9% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +38.8% vs AMGN's +22.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 16.1% ROA vs PFE's 3.6%, ROIC 23.4% vs 7.5% |
AMGN vs BMY vs GILD vs PFE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
AMGN vs BMY vs GILD vs PFE — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
GILD leads in 3 of 6 categories
BMY leads 1 • PFE leads 1 • AMGN leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GILD leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PFE is the larger business by revenue, generating $63.3B annually — 2.1x GILD's $29.7B. GILD is the more profitable business, keeping 31.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PFE's 11.8%. On growth, AMGN holds the edge at +5.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $37.2B | $48.5B | $29.7B | $63.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $15.6B | $15.7B | $12.1B | $21.0B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $7.8B | $7.3B | $9.2B | $7.5B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $8.6B | $11.9B | $10.3B | $9.5B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +71.5% | +68.7% | +63.0% | +69.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +31.6% | +25.7% | +38.2% | +23.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +20.9% | +15.0% | +31.0% | +11.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +23.1% | +24.6% | +34.8% | +15.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +5.8% | +2.6% | +4.4% | +5.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +4.4% | +9.2% | +54.8% | -9.5% |
Valuation Metrics
BMY leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 16.3x trailing earnings, BMY trades at a 29% valuation discount to AMGN's 23.1x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), GILD offers better value at 0.15x vs AMGN's 7.86x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $177.6B | $114.8B | $166.4B | $150.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $223.1B | $151.8B | $183.4B | $216.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 23.12x | 16.30x | 19.77x | 19.47x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 14.74x | 8.93x | 15.69x | 8.94x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 7.86x | — | 0.15x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 14.08x | 9.17x | 16.95x | 10.66x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.83x | 2.38x | 5.65x | 2.41x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 20.60x | 6.20x | 7.44x | 1.74x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 21.92x | 8.94x | 17.60x | 16.60x |
Profitability & Efficiency
GILD leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
AMGN delivers a 89.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $89 in annual profit, vs $8 for PFE. PFE carries lower financial leverage with a 0.78x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to AMGN's 6.31x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), GILD scores 9/9 vs PFE's 7/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +89.4% | +39.0% | +42.3% | +8.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +8.6% | +7.9% | +16.1% | +3.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +14.8% | +16.9% | +23.4% | +7.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +16.0% | +18.7% | +25.1% | +9.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 6.31x | 2.55x | 1.09x | 0.78x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $45.5B | $36.9B | $17.0B | $66.3B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $9.1B | $10.2B | $7.6B | $1.1B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $54.6B | $47.1B | $24.6B | $67.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 5.02x | 10.33x | 8.87x | 4.02x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
GILD leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in GILD five years ago would be worth $22,418 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,674 for PFE. Over the past 12 months, GILD leads with a +38.8% total return vs AMGN's +22.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GILD at 22.2% vs PFE's -6.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +1.2% | +7.6% | +10.9% | +6.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +22.8% | +23.4% | +38.8% | +23.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +51.9% | -7.1% | +82.4% | -18.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +46.2% | +5.2% | +124.2% | -13.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +156.4% | +6.7% | +87.8% | +29.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +15.0% | -2.4% | +22.2% | -6.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — BMY and PFE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
BMY is the less volatile stock with a 0.50 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than GILD's 0.66 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PFE currently trades 92.1% from its 52-week high vs AMGN's 84.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.60x | 0.50x | 0.66x | 0.54x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $391.29 | $62.89 | $157.29 | $28.75 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $261.43 | $42.52 | $95.30 | $21.97 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +84.1% | +89.4% | +85.2% | +92.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 39.4 | 41.4 | 52.6 | 44.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.5M | 10.3M | 5.8M | 33.3M |
Analyst Outlook
PFE leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: AMGN as "Buy", BMY as "Hold", GILD as "Buy", PFE as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 20.8% upside for GILD (target: $162) vs 3.0% for PFE (target: $27). For income investors, PFE offers the higher dividend yield at 6.49% vs GILD's 2.38%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $350.76 | $62.00 | $161.88 | $27.27 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 38 | 41 | 58 | 39 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.9% | +4.4% | +2.4% | +6.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 15 | 6 | 11 | 15 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $9.45 | $2.47 | $3.19 | $1.72 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +1.2% | 0.0% |
GILD leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). BMY leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
AMGN vs BMY vs GILD vs PFE: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is AMGN or BMY or GILD or PFE a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Amgen Inc.
(AMGN) is the stronger pick with 9. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 6% for Pfizer Inc. (PFE). Bristol-Myers Squibb Company (BMY) offers the better valuation at 16. 3x trailing P/E (8. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Amgen Inc. (AMGN) a "Buy" — based on 38 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — AMGN or BMY or GILD or PFE?
On trailing P/E, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company (BMY) is the cheapest at 16.
3x versus Amgen Inc. at 23. 1x. On forward P/E, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company is actually cheaper at 8. 9x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — AMGN or BMY or GILD or PFE?
Over the past 5 years, Gilead Sciences, Inc.
(GILD) delivered a total return of +124. 2%, compared to -13. 3% for Pfizer Inc. (PFE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AMGN returned +156. 4% versus BMY's +6. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — AMGN or BMY or GILD or PFE?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Bristol-Myers Squibb Company (BMY) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
50β versus Gilead Sciences, Inc. 's 0. 66β — meaning GILD is approximately 31% more volatile than BMY relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Pfizer Inc. (PFE) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 78% versus 6% for Amgen Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — AMGN or BMY or GILD or PFE?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Amgen Inc.
(AMGN) is pulling ahead at 9. 9% versus -1. 6% for Pfizer Inc. (PFE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Gilead Sciences, Inc. grew EPS 1684% year-over-year, compared to -3. 5% for Pfizer Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, AMGN leads at 11. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — AMGN or BMY or GILD or PFE?
Gilead Sciences, Inc.
(GILD) is the more profitable company, earning 28. 9% net margin versus 12. 4% for Pfizer Inc. — meaning it keeps 28. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: GILD leads at 40. 1% versus 24. 7% for PFE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — GILD leads at 86. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is AMGN or BMY or GILD or PFE more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company (BMY) trades at 8.
9x forward P/E versus 15. 7x for Gilead Sciences, Inc. — 6. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for GILD: 20. 8% to $161. 88.
08Which pays a better dividend — AMGN or BMY or GILD or PFE?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Pfizer Inc. (PFE) offers the highest yield at 6. 5%, versus 2. 4% for Gilead Sciences, Inc. (GILD).
09Is AMGN or BMY or GILD or PFE better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Amgen Inc.
(AMGN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 60), 2. 9% yield, +156. 4% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (AMGN: +156. 4%, GILD: +87. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between AMGN and BMY and GILD and PFE?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: AMGN is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; BMY is a mid-cap deep-value stock; GILD is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; PFE is a mid-cap income-oriented stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.