Biotechnology
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
AMLX vs ACAD vs BIIB vs ALKS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Drug Manufacturers - General
Biotechnology
AMLX vs ACAD vs BIIB vs ALKS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Drug Manufacturers - General | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $1.16B | $3.66B | $29.52B | $7.49B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $1.10B | $9.86B | $1.56B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-150M | $376M | $1.37B | $153M |
| Gross Margin | — | 91.5% | 69.8% | 65.4% |
| Operating Margin | — | 7.4% | 15.6% | 12.3% |
| Forward P/E | — | 54.2x | 13.7x | 31.4x |
| Total Debt | $6M | $52M | $6.95B | $70M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $227M | $178M | $3.01B | $1.12B |
AMLX vs ACAD vs BIIB vs ALKS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jan 22 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Amylyx Pharmaceutic… (AMLX) | 100 | 62.9 | -37.1% |
| ACADIA Pharmaceutic… (ACAD) | 100 | 93.8 | -6.2% |
| Biogen Inc. (BIIB) | 100 | 88.5 | -11.5% |
| Alkermes plc (ALKS) | 100 | 173.6 | +73.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: AMLX vs ACAD vs BIIB vs ALKS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
AMLX is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +156.6% vs ACAD's -4.1%
ACAD carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 11.9%, EPS growth 68.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 27.5%
- 11.9% revenue growth vs AMLX's -100.0%
- 34.3% margin vs AMLX's 2.8%
- 26.2% ROA vs AMLX's -50.7%, ROIC 10.0% vs -132.2%
BIIB is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and defensive is your priority.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.39
- Beta 0.39, current ratio 2.68x
- Lower P/E (13.7x vs 31.4x)
- Beta 0.39 vs AMLX's 1.47
ALKS is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 5.8% 10Y total return vs AMLX's -17.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.92, Low D/E 3.8%, current ratio 3.55x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 11.9% revenue growth vs AMLX's -100.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (13.7x vs 31.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 34.3% margin vs AMLX's 2.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.39 vs AMLX's 1.47 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +156.6% vs ACAD's -4.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 26.2% ROA vs AMLX's -50.7%, ROIC 10.0% vs -132.2% |
AMLX vs ACAD vs BIIB vs ALKS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
AMLX vs ACAD vs BIIB vs ALKS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
BIIB leads in 2 of 6 categories
ALKS leads 2 • AMLX leads 1 • ACAD leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BIIB leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BIIB and AMLX operate at a comparable scale, with $9.9B and $0 in trailing revenue. ACAD is the more profitable business, keeping 34.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ALKS's 9.8%. On growth, ALKS holds the edge at +28.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $1.1B | $9.9B | $1.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$159M | $96M | $2.4B | $212M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$150M | $376M | $1.4B | $153M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$121M | $212M | $2.6B | $392M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +91.5% | +69.8% | +65.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | +7.4% | +15.6% | +12.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | +34.3% | +13.9% | +9.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | +19.4% | +26.6% | +25.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +9.7% | +1.9% | +28.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +11.9% | -81.8% | +31.1% | -4.1% |
Valuation Metrics
BIIB leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 9.3x trailing earnings, ACAD trades at a 70% valuation discount to ALKS's 31.4x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, BIIB's 11.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than ACAD's 25.5x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.2B | $3.7B | $29.5B | $7.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $936M | $3.5B | $33.5B | $6.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -9.09x | 9.34x | 22.65x | 31.41x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 54.20x | 13.68x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 25.46x | 11.90x | 22.90x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 3.42x | 3.01x | 5.07x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 4.31x | 2.99x | 1.61x | 4.17x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 34.83x | 14.40x | 15.59x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ALKS leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ACAD delivers a 35.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $36 in annual profit, vs $-56 for AMLX. AMLX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.02x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BIIB's 0.38x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ALKS scores 7/9 vs AMLX's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -55.7% | +35.6% | +7.5% | +8.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -50.7% | +26.2% | +4.7% | +5.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -132.2% | +10.0% | +6.5% | +18.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -64.5% | +10.1% | +7.7% | +14.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 6 | 5 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.02x | 0.04x | 0.38x | 0.04x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$221M | -$126M | $3.9B | -$1.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $227M | $178M | $3.0B | $1.1B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $6M | $52M | $6.9B | $70M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | — | 6.91x | 32.30x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ALKS leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ALKS five years ago would be worth $17,946 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,041 for BIIB. Over the past 12 months, AMLX leads with a +156.6% total return vs ACAD's -4.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ALKS at 12.9% vs AMLX's -17.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +21.8% | -18.2% | +12.5% | +59.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +156.6% | -4.1% | +50.3% | +44.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -44.0% | -13.1% | -36.2% | +43.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -23.0% | -22.0% | -49.6% | +79.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -17.4% | -43.9% | -18.2% | +5.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -17.6% | -4.6% | -13.9% | +12.9% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — BIIB and ALKS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
BIIB is the less volatile stock with a 0.39 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AMLX's 1.47 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ALKS currently trades 98.2% from its 52-week high vs AMLX's 74.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.40x | 1.10x | 0.40x | 0.90x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $18.61 | $27.81 | $205.97 | $45.76 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $4.80 | $19.69 | $121.05 | $25.17 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +74.8% | +76.9% | +97.1% | +98.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 44.0 | 46.3 | 51.7 | 71.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.1M | 1.5M | 1.1M | 1.9M |
Analyst Outlook
AMLX leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: AMLX as "Buy", ACAD as "Buy", BIIB as "Buy", ALKS as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 97.7% upside for AMLX (target: $28) vs 6.2% for BIIB (target: $212).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $27.50 | $34.78 | $212.26 | $48.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 11 | 37 | 48 | 28 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | — | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.4% |
BIIB leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). ALKS leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). 1 tied.
AMLX vs ACAD vs BIIB vs ALKS: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is AMLX or ACAD or BIIB or ALKS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc.
(ACAD) is the stronger pick with 11. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for Amylyx Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (AMLX). ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc. (ACAD) offers the better valuation at 9. 3x trailing P/E (54. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Amylyx Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (AMLX) a "Buy" — based on 11 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — AMLX or ACAD or BIIB or ALKS?
On trailing P/E, ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc.
(ACAD) is the cheapest at 9. 3x versus Alkermes plc at 31. 4x. On forward P/E, Biogen Inc. is actually cheaper at 13. 7x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — AMLX or ACAD or BIIB or ALKS?
Over the past 5 years, Alkermes plc (ALKS) delivered a total return of +79.
5%, compared to -49. 6% for Biogen Inc. (BIIB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ALKS returned +4. 3% versus ACAD's -44. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — AMLX or ACAD or BIIB or ALKS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Biogen Inc.
(BIIB) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 40β versus Amylyx Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 's 1. 40β — meaning AMLX is approximately 246% more volatile than BIIB relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Amylyx Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (AMLX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 38% for Biogen Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — AMLX or ACAD or BIIB or ALKS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc.
(ACAD) is pulling ahead at 11. 9% versus -100. 0% for Amylyx Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (AMLX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc. grew EPS 68. 4% year-over-year, compared to -34. 1% for Alkermes plc. Over a 3-year CAGR, ACAD leads at 27. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — AMLX or ACAD or BIIB or ALKS?
ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc.
(ACAD) is the more profitable company, earning 36. 5% net margin versus 0. 0% for Amylyx Pharmaceuticals, Inc. — meaning it keeps 36. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BIIB leads at 19. 1% versus 0. 0% for AMLX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ACAD leads at 91. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is AMLX or ACAD or BIIB or ALKS more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Biogen Inc.
(BIIB) trades at 13. 7x forward P/E versus 54. 2x for ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc. — 40. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for AMLX: 97. 7% to $27. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — AMLX or ACAD or BIIB or ALKS?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is AMLX or ACAD or BIIB or ALKS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Biogen Inc.
(BIIB) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 40)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (BIIB: -18. 1%, AMLX: -13. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between AMLX and ACAD and BIIB and ALKS?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: AMLX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ACAD is a small-cap deep-value stock; BIIB is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; ALKS is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.