Software - Application
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
AMOD vs CDLX
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Advertising Agencies
AMOD vs CDLX — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Application | Advertising Agencies |
| Market Cap | $1M | $43M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $206M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-7M | $-95M |
| Gross Margin | — | 38.9% |
| Operating Margin | — | -22.8% |
| Forward P/E | 0.3x | — |
| Total Debt | $5M | $215M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $736K | $49M |
AMOD vs CDLX — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Dec 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alpha Modus Holding… (AMOD) | 100 | 7.7 | -92.3% |
| Cardlytics, Inc. (CDLX) | 100 | 21.1 | -78.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: AMOD vs CDLX
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
AMOD is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 1.51
- EPS growth 20.3%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.51, current ratio 0.23x
CDLX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.
- -94.2% 10Y total return vs AMOD's -97.8%
- -16.2% revenue growth vs AMOD's -8.4%
- -63.8% vs AMOD's -82.3%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | -16.2% revenue growth vs AMOD's -8.4% | |
| Quality / Margins | -9.9% margin vs CDLX's -46.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.51 vs CDLX's 3.18 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | -63.8% vs AMOD's -82.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -31.5% ROA vs AMOD's -18.2% |
AMOD vs CDLX — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
AMOD vs CDLX — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CDLX leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CDLX and AMOD operate at a comparable scale, with $206M and $0 in trailing revenue.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $206M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$4M | -$23M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$7M | -$95M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$2M | $6M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +38.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | -22.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | -46.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | +2.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -44.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -176.2% | +3.8% |
Valuation Metrics
CDLX leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1M | $43M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $6M | $210M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 0.32x | -0.40x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 1.30x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 0.18x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 4.89x |
Profitability & Efficiency
AMOD leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CDLX scores 6/9 vs AMOD's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | -8.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -18.2% | -31.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | -18.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | — | -20.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $4M | $167M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $735,814 | $49M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $5M | $215M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -1.09x | -14.37x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CDLX leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in AMOD five years ago would be worth $222 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $78 for CDLX. Over the past 12 months, CDLX leads with a -63.8% total return vs AMOD's -82.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CDLX at -48.8% vs AMOD's -71.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -50.2% | -30.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -82.3% | -63.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.8% | -86.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.8% | -99.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.8% | -94.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -71.9% | -48.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — AMOD and CDLX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
AMOD is the less volatile stock with a 1.51 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CDLX's 3.18 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CDLX currently trades 23.8% from its 52-week high vs AMOD's 8.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.51x | 3.18x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $2.60 | $3.28 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.20 | $0.66 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +8.8% | +23.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 26.0 | 36.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.3M | 1.2M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
CDLX leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). AMOD leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 1 tied.
AMOD vs CDLX: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is AMOD or CDLX a better buy right now?
Alpha Modus Holdings, Inc.
(AMOD) offers the better valuation at 0. 3x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — AMOD or CDLX?
Over the past 5 years, Alpha Modus Holdings, Inc.
(AMOD) delivered a total return of -97. 8%, compared to -99. 2% for Cardlytics, Inc. (CDLX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CDLX returned -94. 2% versus AMOD's -97. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — AMOD or CDLX?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Alpha Modus Holdings, Inc.
(AMOD) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 51β versus Cardlytics, Inc. 's 3. 18β — meaning CDLX is approximately 111% more volatile than AMOD relative to the S&P 500.
04Which is growing faster — AMOD or CDLX?
On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Alpha Modus Holdings, Inc.
grew EPS 20. 3% year-over-year, compared to 50. 1% for Cardlytics, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — AMOD or CDLX?
Alpha Modus Holdings, Inc.
(AMOD) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 0% net margin versus -44. 4% for Cardlytics, Inc. — meaning it keeps 0. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AMOD leads at 0. 0% versus -20. 2% for CDLX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CDLX leads at 45. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — AMOD or CDLX?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is AMOD or CDLX better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Alpha Modus Holdings, Inc.
(AMOD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding. Cardlytics, Inc. (CDLX) carries a higher beta of 3. 18 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (AMOD: -97. 8%, CDLX: -94. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between AMOD and CDLX?
These companies operate in different sectors (AMOD (Technology) and CDLX (Communication Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: AMOD is a small-cap deep-value stock; CDLX is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.