Comprehensive Stock Comparison
Compare Alpha Modus Holdings, Inc. (AMOD) vs NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) Stock
Analyze side-by-side fundamentals, valuation, growth, and profitability to decide which stock is the better buy.
Selected Stocks
Add up to 10 tickers. Use presets or search to get started.
Quick Verdict
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Value | AMOD | Lower P/E (0.7x vs 21.9x) |
| Stability / Safety | AMOD | Beta 0.60 vs NVDA's 1.73 |
| Dividends | NVDA | 0.0% yield; 2-year raise streak; AMOD pays no meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | NVDA | +41.9% vs AMOD's -75.4% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | NVDA | 58.1% ROA vs AMOD's -18.2% |
Who Each Stock Is For
Income & stability
Growth exposure
Long-term compounding (10Y)
Sleep-well-at-night portfolio
Defensive / Recession hedge
Business Model
What each company does and how it makes money
Alpha Modus Holdings develops data-driven technologies that enhance in-store digital experiences for consumers at the point of purchase decision. It generates revenue primarily through technology licensing and patent monetization — including its 571-patent portfolio — with additional income from software development services. The company's key advantage lies in its extensive intellectual property portfolio covering retail technology, which creates barriers to entry for competitors.
NVIDIA designs and sells graphics processing units (GPUs) and accelerated computing platforms that power artificial intelligence, gaming, and professional visualization applications. The company generates revenue primarily through its Data Center segment — which includes AI chips and systems — accounting for over 70% of sales, supplemented by its Gaming GPU business and professional visualization offerings. NVIDIA's competitive moat stems from its CUDA software ecosystem — which locks developers into its hardware architecture — and its years of architectural leadership in parallel processing for AI workloads.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Financial Metrics Comparison
Side-by-side fundamentals across 2 stocks. BestLagging
Financial Scorecard
NVDA leads in 2 of 6 categories (Financial Metrics, Total Returns). AMOD leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). 1 tied.
Financial Metrics (TTM)
NVDA and AMOD operate at a comparable scale, with $215.9B and $0 in trailing revenue.
| Metric | AMODAlpha Modus Holdi… | NVDANVIDIA Corporation |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $215.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$4M | $133.2B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$7M | $120.1B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$2M | $96.7B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +71.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | +60.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | +55.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | +44.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +73.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -176.2% | +97.8% |
Valuation Metrics
At 0.7x trailing earnings, AMOD trades at a 98% valuation discount to NVDA's 36.2x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, AMOD's 6.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than NVDA's 32.3x.
| Metric | AMODAlpha Modus Holdi… | NVDANVIDIA Corporation |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $24M | $4.31T |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $28M | $4.31T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 0.69x | 36.16x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 21.88x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.38x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 6.57x | 32.33x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 19.94x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 27.52x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 44.54x |
Profitability & Efficiency
On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AMOD scores 5/9 vs NVDA's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | AMODAlpha Modus Holdi… | NVDANVIDIA Corporation |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | +76.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -18.2% | +58.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | +81.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | — | +97.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.07x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $4M | $807M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $735,814 | $10.6B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $5M | $11.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -1.09x | 545.03x |
Total Returns (with DRIP)
A $10,000 investment in NVDA five years ago would be worth $128,116 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $484 for AMOD. Over the past 12 months, NVDA leads with a +41.9% total return vs AMOD's -75.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NVDA at 96.9% vs AMOD's -63.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | AMODAlpha Modus Holdi… | NVDANVIDIA Corporation |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +8.5% | -6.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -75.4% | +41.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -95.2% | +663.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -95.2% | +1181.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -95.2% | +22525.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -63.6% | +96.9% |
Risk & Volatility
AMOD is the less volatile stock with a 0.60 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NVDA's 1.73 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NVDA currently trades 83.5% from its 52-week high vs AMOD's 19.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | AMODAlpha Modus Holdi… | NVDANVIDIA Corporation |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.60x | 1.73x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $2.60 | $212.19 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.40 | $86.62 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +19.3% | +83.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 38.6 | 47.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.8M | 136.2M |
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | AMODAlpha Modus Holdi… | NVDANVIDIA Corporation |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $271.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 79 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.04 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.9% |
Historical Charts
Charts are rendered on first load. Hover for details.
Chart 1Total Return — 5 Years (Rebased to 100)
| Stock | Dec 24 | Feb 26 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alpha Modus Holding… (AMOD) | 100 | 8.83 | -91.2% |
| NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) | 100 | 134.2 | +34.2% |
NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) returned +1.2K% over 5 years vs Alpha Modus Holding… (AMOD)'s -95%. A $10,000 investment in NVDA 5 years ago would be worth $128,116 today (including dividends reinvested).
Chart 2Revenue Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2017 | 2026 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alpha Modus Holding… (AMOD) | $0.00 | $0.00 | — |
| NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) | $6.9B | $215.9B | +3025.0% |
NVIDIA Corporation's revenue grew from $6.9B (2017) to $215.9B (2026) — a 46.6% CAGR.
Chart 3P/E Ratio History — 10 Years
| Stock | 2017 | 2026 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) | 75.6 | 36.2 | -52.1% |
NVIDIA Corporation has traded in a 28x–291x P/E range over 10 years; current trailing P/E is ~36x.
Chart 4EPS Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2017 | 2026 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alpha Modus Holding… (AMOD) | 0.03 | 0.73 | +2167.1% |
| NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) | 0.06 | 4.9 | +7556.3% |
NVIDIA Corporation's EPS grew from $0.06 (2017) to $4.90 (2026) — a 62% CAGR.
Chart 5Free Cash Flow — 5 Years
Alpha Modus Holdings, Inc. generated $-2M FCF in 2024 (-36% vs 2021). NVIDIA Corporation generated $97B FCF in 2026 (+1960% vs 2021).
AMOD vs NVDA: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is AMOD or NVDA a better buy right now?
Alpha Modus Holdings, Inc. (AMOD) offers the better valuation at 0.7x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) a "Buy" — based on 79 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — AMOD or NVDA?
On trailing P/E, Alpha Modus Holdings, Inc. (AMOD) is the cheapest at 0.7x versus NVIDIA Corporation at 36.2x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — AMOD or NVDA?
Over the past 5 years, NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) delivered a total return of +1181%, compared to -95.2% for Alpha Modus Holdings, Inc. (AMOD). A $10,000 investment in NVDA five years ago would be worth approximately $128K today (assuming dividends reinvested). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NVDA returned +225.3% versus AMOD's -95.2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — AMOD or NVDA?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Alpha Modus Holdings, Inc. (AMOD) is the lower-risk stock at 0.60β versus NVIDIA Corporation's 1.73β — meaning NVDA is approximately 188% more volatile than AMOD relative to the S&P 500.
05Which has better profit margins — AMOD or NVDA?
NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) is the more profitable company, earning 55.6% net margin versus 0.0% for Alpha Modus Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 55.6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NVDA leads at 60.4% versus 0.0% for AMOD. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NVDA leads at 71.1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — AMOD or NVDA?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend. All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is AMOD or NVDA better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Alpha Modus Holdings, Inc. (AMOD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.60)). NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) carries a higher beta of 1.73 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (AMOD: -95.2%, NVDA: +225.3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between AMOD and NVDA?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both. In terms of investment character: AMOD is a small-cap deep-value stock; NVDA is a mega-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that beat both.