Software - Application
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
AMOD vs TPVG vs PERI vs HRZN vs MGNI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Asset Management
Internet Content & Information
Asset Management
Advertising Agencies
AMOD vs TPVG vs PERI vs HRZN vs MGNI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Application | Asset Management | Internet Content & Information | Asset Management | Advertising Agencies |
| Market Cap | $1M | $243M | $483M | $199M | $2.01B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $97M | $440M | $40M | $723M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-7M | $-12M | $-8M | $28M | $159M |
| Gross Margin | — | 83.5% | 33.3% | 18.0% | 63.4% |
| Operating Margin | — | 77.9% | -3.4% | -4.0% | 14.8% |
| Forward P/E | 0.3x | 6.5x | 8.9x | 6.1x | 13.4x |
| Total Debt | $5M | $469M | $42M | $473M | $279M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $736K | $20M | $91M | $106M | $553M |
AMOD vs TPVG vs PERI vs HRZN vs MGNI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Dec 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alpha Modus Holding… (AMOD) | 100 | 7.7 | -92.3% |
| TriplePoint Venture… (TPVG) | 100 | 81.2 | -18.8% |
| Perion Network Ltd. (PERI) | 100 | 127.3 | +27.3% |
| Horizon Technology … (HRZN) | 100 | 50.2 | -49.8% |
| Magnite, Inc. (MGNI) | 100 | 87.9 | -12.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: AMOD vs TPVG vs PERI vs HRZN vs MGNI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
AMOD lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
TPVG carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding and bank quality.
- 93.3% 10Y total return vs PERI's 139.6%
- NIM 7.4% vs HRZN's 7.1%
- 36.6% NII/revenue growth vs AMOD's -8.4%
- 50.6% margin vs AMOD's -9.9%
PERI is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.94, Low D/E 6.3%, current ratio 2.76x
HRZN is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and valuation efficiency is your priority.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.70, yield 27.8%
- PEG 0.26 vs TPVG's 6.41
- Beta 0.70, yield 27.8%, current ratio 1.24x
- Lower P/E (6.1x vs 13.4x)
MGNI ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 6.9%, EPS growth 493.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 7.4%
- 5.3% ROA vs AMOD's -18.2%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 36.6% NII/revenue growth vs AMOD's -8.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (6.1x vs 13.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 50.6% margin vs AMOD's -9.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.70 vs MGNI's 1.63 | |
| Dividends | 27.8% yield, vs TPVG's 17.1%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +19.3% vs AMOD's -82.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 5.3% ROA vs AMOD's -18.2% |
AMOD vs TPVG vs PERI vs HRZN vs MGNI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
AMOD vs TPVG vs PERI vs HRZN vs MGNI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
HRZN leads in 2 of 6 categories
TPVG leads 1 • MGNI leads 1 • AMOD leads 0 • PERI leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TPVG leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MGNI and AMOD operate at a comparable scale, with $723M and $0 in trailing revenue. TPVG is the more profitable business, keeping 50.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to HRZN's -6.6%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $97M | $440M | $40M | $723M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$4M | -$22M | $3M | $19M | $145M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$7M | -$12M | -$8M | $28M | $159M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$2M | $35M | $39M | $67M | $44M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +83.5% | +33.3% | +18.0% | +63.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | +77.9% | -3.4% | -4.0% | +14.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | +50.6% | -1.8% | -6.6% | +22.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | -58.7% | +8.9% | +141.5% | +6.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | +5.8% | — | +5.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -176.2% | -2.3% | +72.7% | -29.6% | +142.9% |
Valuation Metrics
HRZN leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 0.3x trailing earnings, AMOD trades at a 98% valuation discount to MGNI's 14.7x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), HRZN offers better value at 0.18x vs TPVG's 4.84x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1M | $243M | $483M | $199M | $2.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $6M | $691M | $434M | $567M | $1.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 0.32x | 4.91x | -56.74x | 4.30x | 14.74x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 6.50x | 8.89x | 6.10x | 13.45x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 4.84x | — | 0.18x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 1.30x | 9.13x | 106.04x | — | 11.43x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 2.50x | 1.10x | 4.97x | 2.81x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 0.68x | 0.67x | 0.60x | 2.33x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 12.66x | 3.51x | 12.11x |
Profitability & Efficiency
MGNI leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MGNI delivers a 18.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $19 in annual profit, vs $-3 for TPVG. PERI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.06x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HRZN's 1.49x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MGNI scores 6/9 vs PERI's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | -3.4% | -1.2% | +9.0% | +18.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -18.2% | -1.5% | -0.9% | +3.6% | +5.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | +7.2% | -1.7% | -0.2% | +9.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | — | +9.4% | -1.8% | -0.2% | +7.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 1.33x | 0.06x | 1.49x | 0.30x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $4M | $449M | -$49M | $368M | -$275M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $735,814 | $20M | $91M | $106M | $553M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $5M | $469M | $42M | $473M | $279M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -1.09x | -1.02x | — | 0.60x | 4.03x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — TPVG and PERI and MGNI each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TPVG five years ago would be worth $8,649 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $222 for AMOD. Over the past 12 months, TPVG leads with a +19.3% total return vs AMOD's -82.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MGNI at 16.7% vs AMOD's -71.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -50.2% | -6.3% | +15.3% | -26.7% | -12.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -82.3% | +19.3% | +16.9% | -23.2% | +12.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.8% | -3.4% | -68.0% | -27.7% | +58.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.8% | -13.5% | -37.2% | -32.8% | -60.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.8% | +93.3% | +139.6% | +52.9% | -4.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -71.9% | -1.2% | -31.6% | -10.3% | +16.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — PERI and HRZN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
HRZN is the less volatile stock with a 0.70 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MGNI's 1.63 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PERI currently trades 91.4% from its 52-week high vs AMOD's 8.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.51x | 0.83x | 0.94x | 0.70x | 1.63x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $2.60 | $7.53 | $11.79 | $8.46 | $26.65 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.20 | $4.48 | $8.07 | $3.80 | $10.82 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +8.8% | +79.5% | +91.4% | +53.3% | +52.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 26.0 | 58.3 | 59.1 | 58.5 | 55.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.3M | 504K | 321K | 1.2M | 2.1M |
Analyst Outlook
HRZN leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: TPVG as "Hold", PERI as "Buy", HRZN as "Hold", MGNI as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 49.4% upside for TPVG (target: $9) vs 28.6% for MGNI (target: $18). For income investors, HRZN offers the higher dividend yield at 27.80% vs TPVG's 17.11%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $8.95 | $14.00 | $6.50 | $18.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 12 | 13 | 22 | 31 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +17.1% | — | +27.8% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $1.02 | — | $1.25 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +14.7% | 0.0% | +2.3% |
HRZN leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). TPVG leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 2 tied.
AMOD vs TPVG vs PERI vs HRZN vs MGNI: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is AMOD or TPVG or PERI or HRZN or MGNI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.
(TPVG) is the stronger pick with 36. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -11. 7% for Perion Network Ltd. (PERI). Alpha Modus Holdings, Inc. (AMOD) offers the better valuation at 0. 3x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Perion Network Ltd. (PERI) a "Buy" — based on 13 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — AMOD or TPVG or PERI or HRZN or MGNI?
On trailing P/E, Alpha Modus Holdings, Inc.
(AMOD) is the cheapest at 0. 3x versus Magnite, Inc. at 14. 7x. On forward P/E, Horizon Technology Finance Corporation is actually cheaper at 6. 1x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Horizon Technology Finance Corporation wins at 0. 26x versus TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. 's 6. 41x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — AMOD or TPVG or PERI or HRZN or MGNI?
Over the past 5 years, TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.
(TPVG) delivered a total return of -13. 5%, compared to -97. 8% for Alpha Modus Holdings, Inc. (AMOD). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PERI returned +139. 6% versus AMOD's -97. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — AMOD or TPVG or PERI or HRZN or MGNI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Horizon Technology Finance Corporation (HRZN) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
70β versus Magnite, Inc. 's 1. 63β — meaning MGNI is approximately 133% more volatile than HRZN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Perion Network Ltd. (PERI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 6% versus 149% for Horizon Technology Finance Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — AMOD or TPVG or PERI or HRZN or MGNI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.
(TPVG) is pulling ahead at 36. 6% versus -11. 7% for Perion Network Ltd. (PERI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Alpha Modus Holdings, Inc. grew EPS 20. 3% year-over-year, compared to -176. 0% for Perion Network Ltd.. Over a 3-year CAGR, MGNI leads at 7. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — AMOD or TPVG or PERI or HRZN or MGNI?
TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.
(TPVG) is the more profitable company, earning 50. 6% net margin versus -6. 6% for Horizon Technology Finance Corporation — meaning it keeps 50. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TPVG leads at 77. 9% versus -4. 0% for HRZN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TPVG leads at 83. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is AMOD or TPVG or PERI or HRZN or MGNI more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Horizon Technology Finance Corporation (HRZN) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 26x versus TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. 's 6. 41x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Horizon Technology Finance Corporation (HRZN) trades at 6. 1x forward P/E versus 13. 4x for Magnite, Inc. — 7. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TPVG: 49. 4% to $8. 95.
08Which pays a better dividend — AMOD or TPVG or PERI or HRZN or MGNI?
In this comparison, HRZN (27.
8% yield), TPVG (17. 1% yield) pay a dividend. AMOD, PERI, MGNI do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is AMOD or TPVG or PERI or HRZN or MGNI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Horizon Technology Finance Corporation (HRZN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
70), 27. 8% yield). Magnite, Inc. (MGNI) carries a higher beta of 1. 63 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (HRZN: +52. 9%, MGNI: -4. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between AMOD and TPVG and PERI and HRZN and MGNI?
These companies operate in different sectors (AMOD (Technology) and TPVG (Financial Services) and PERI (Communication Services) and HRZN (Financial Services) and MGNI (Communication Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: AMOD is a small-cap deep-value stock; TPVG is a small-cap high-growth stock; PERI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; HRZN is a small-cap high-growth stock; MGNI is a small-cap deep-value stock. TPVG, HRZN pay a dividend while AMOD, PERI, MGNI do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Revenue Growth > 5%
- Gross Margin > 20%
- Sector: Financial Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Revenue Growth > 8%
- Dividend Yield > 11.1%
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.