Communication Equipment
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
AMPG vs RFIL vs GILT vs VIAV
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Electrical Equipment & Parts
Communication Equipment
Communication Equipment
AMPG vs RFIL vs GILT vs VIAV — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Communication Equipment | Electrical Equipment & Parts | Communication Equipment | Communication Equipment |
| Market Cap | $45M | $165M | $1.42B | $11.85B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $23M | $80M | $452M | $1.37B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-8M | $270K | $21M | $-55M |
| Gross Margin | 23.1% | 32.0% | 29.5% | 55.7% |
| Operating Margin | -37.1% | 3.4% | 3.6% | 8.2% |
| Forward P/E | — | 26.3x | 38.8x | 54.7x |
| Total Debt | $5M | $27M | $11M | $692M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $19M | $5M | $169M | $424M |
AMPG vs RFIL vs GILT vs VIAV — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jan 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| AmpliTech Group, In… (AMPG) | 100 | 16.7 | -83.3% |
| RF Industries, Ltd. (RFIL) | 100 | 260.3 | +160.3% |
| Gilat Satellite Net… (GILT) | 100 | 169.8 | +69.8% |
| Viavi Solutions Inc. (VIAV) | 100 | 331.5 | +231.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: AMPG vs RFIL vs GILT vs VIAV
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
AMPG lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
RFIL is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Lower P/E (26.3x vs 54.7x)
GILT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 47.9%, EPS growth -22.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 23.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 2.12, Low D/E 2.2%, current ratio 1.84x
- 47.9% revenue growth vs AMPG's -39.0%
- 4.6% margin vs AMPG's -33.8%
VIAV is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.65
- 7.2% 10Y total return vs RFIL's 5.6%
- Beta 1.65, current ratio 1.50x
- Beta 1.65 vs AMPG's 2.87
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 47.9% revenue growth vs AMPG's -39.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (26.3x vs 54.7x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 4.6% margin vs AMPG's -33.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.65 vs AMPG's 2.87 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +458.5% vs AMPG's +22.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 2.8% ROA vs AMPG's -16.1%, ROIC 5.7% vs -27.1% |
AMPG vs RFIL vs GILT vs VIAV — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
AMPG vs RFIL vs GILT vs VIAV — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
RFIL leads in 1 of 6 categories
GILT leads 1 • VIAV leads 1 • AMPG leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — RFIL and VIAV each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
VIAV is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.4B annually — 60.5x AMPG's $23M. GILT is the more profitable business, keeping 4.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to AMPG's -33.8%. On growth, AMPG holds the edge at +115.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $23M | $80M | $452M | $1.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$7M | $5M | $40M | $207M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$8M | $270,000 | $21M | -$55M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$6M | $4M | $10M | $46M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +23.1% | +32.0% | +29.5% | +55.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -37.1% | +3.4% | +3.6% | +8.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -33.8% | +0.3% | +4.6% | -4.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -26.9% | +5.5% | +2.2% | +3.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +115.0% | -1.2% | +75.3% | +42.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +91.7% | +100.0% | -38.1% | -70.2% |
Valuation Metrics
RFIL leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 57.0x trailing earnings, GILT trades at a 97% valuation discount to RFIL's 2182.9x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, GILT's 28.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than VIAV's 90.7x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $45M | $165M | $1.4B | $11.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $31M | $187M | $1.3B | $12.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -2.04x | 2182.86x | 57.03x | 341.40x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 26.34x | 38.78x | 54.72x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 74.80x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 35.39x | 28.73x | 90.70x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.77x | 2.05x | 3.14x | 10.93x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.61x | 4.67x | 2.34x | 14.81x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 38.04x | 154.44x | 191.12x |
Profitability & Efficiency
GILT leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
GILT delivers a 4.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $4 in annual profit, vs $-21 for AMPG. GILT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.02x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to VIAV's 0.89x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), RFIL scores 8/9 vs GILT's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -21.3% | +0.8% | +4.1% | -6.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -16.1% | +0.4% | +2.8% | -2.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -27.1% | +3.6% | +5.7% | +5.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -23.5% | +5.2% | +4.7% | +4.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 8 | 3 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.12x | 0.76x | 0.02x | 0.89x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$15M | $22M | -$158M | $269M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $19M | $5M | $169M | $424M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $5M | $27M | $11M | $692M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -36.85x | — | 5.18x | 2.70x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
VIAV leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in VIAV five years ago would be worth $31,650 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,104 for AMPG. Over the past 12 months, VIAV leads with a +458.5% total return vs AMPG's +22.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors VIAV at 77.9% vs AMPG's -10.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -32.9% | +169.0% | +44.6% | +182.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +22.9% | +284.9% | +197.4% | +458.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -28.6% | +283.9% | +257.1% | +462.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -49.0% | +138.7% | +116.6% | +216.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -75.0% | +561.0% | +371.3% | +718.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -10.6% | +56.6% | +52.8% | +77.9% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — RFIL and VIAV each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
VIAV is the less volatile stock with a 1.65 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AMPG's 2.87 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. RFIL currently trades 96.7% from its 52-week high vs AMPG's 45.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.87x | 2.11x | 2.12x | 1.65x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $4.89 | $15.80 | $20.56 | $60.43 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.64 | $3.82 | $5.43 | $8.87 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +45.0% | +96.7% | +94.3% | +84.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 51.5 | 61.0 | 55.4 | 62.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 496K | 247K | 656K | 6.3M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — GILT and VIAV each lead in 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: RFIL as "Buy", GILT as "Buy", VIAV as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply -37.0% upside for VIAV (target: $32) vs -63.9% for GILT (target: $7).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | $7.00 | $32.25 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 2 | 2 | 19 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.1% |
RFIL leads in 1 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics). GILT leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 3 tied.
AMPG vs RFIL vs GILT vs VIAV: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is AMPG or RFIL or GILT or VIAV a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Gilat Satellite Networks Ltd.
(GILT) is the stronger pick with 47. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -39. 0% for AmpliTech Group, Inc. (AMPG). Gilat Satellite Networks Ltd. (GILT) offers the better valuation at 57. 0x trailing P/E (38. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate RF Industries, Ltd. (RFIL) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — AMPG or RFIL or GILT or VIAV?
On trailing P/E, Gilat Satellite Networks Ltd.
(GILT) is the cheapest at 57. 0x versus RF Industries, Ltd. at 2182. 9x. On forward P/E, RF Industries, Ltd. is actually cheaper at 26. 3x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — AMPG or RFIL or GILT or VIAV?
Over the past 5 years, Viavi Solutions Inc.
(VIAV) delivered a total return of +216. 5%, compared to -49. 0% for AmpliTech Group, Inc. (AMPG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: VIAV returned +718. 1% versus AMPG's -75. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — AMPG or RFIL or GILT or VIAV?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Viavi Solutions Inc.
(VIAV) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 65β versus AmpliTech Group, Inc. 's 2. 87β — meaning AMPG is approximately 74% more volatile than VIAV relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Gilat Satellite Networks Ltd. (GILT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 89% for Viavi Solutions Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — AMPG or RFIL or GILT or VIAV?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Gilat Satellite Networks Ltd.
(GILT) is pulling ahead at 47. 9% versus -39. 0% for AmpliTech Group, Inc. (AMPG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Viavi Solutions Inc. grew EPS 225. 0% year-over-year, compared to -315. 4% for AmpliTech Group, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, GILT leads at 23. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — AMPG or RFIL or GILT or VIAV?
Gilat Satellite Networks Ltd.
(GILT) is the more profitable company, earning 4. 6% net margin versus -118. 2% for AmpliTech Group, Inc. — meaning it keeps 4. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: VIAV leads at 6. 5% versus -88. 7% for AMPG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — VIAV leads at 56. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is AMPG or RFIL or GILT or VIAV more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, RF Industries, Ltd.
(RFIL) trades at 26. 3x forward P/E versus 54. 7x for Viavi Solutions Inc. — 28. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for VIAV: -37. 0% to $32. 25.
08Which pays a better dividend — AMPG or RFIL or GILT or VIAV?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is AMPG or RFIL or GILT or VIAV better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Viavi Solutions Inc.
(VIAV) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+718. 1% 10Y return). AmpliTech Group, Inc. (AMPG) carries a higher beta of 2. 87 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (VIAV: +718. 1%, AMPG: -75. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between AMPG and RFIL and GILT and VIAV?
These companies operate in different sectors (AMPG (Technology) and RFIL (Industrials) and GILT (Technology) and VIAV (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: AMPG is a small-cap quality compounder stock; RFIL is a small-cap high-growth stock; GILT is a small-cap high-growth stock; VIAV is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.