Communication Equipment
Compare Stocks
3 / 10Stock Comparison
AMPG vs SIFY vs RFIL
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Telecommunications Services
Electrical Equipment & Parts
AMPG vs SIFY vs RFIL — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Communication Equipment | Telecommunications Services | Electrical Equipment & Parts |
| Market Cap | $45M | $1.18B | $165M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $23M | $41.45B | $80M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-8M | $-1.50B | $270K |
| Gross Margin | 23.1% | 34.2% | 32.0% |
| Operating Margin | -37.1% | 5.2% | 3.4% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | 26.3x |
| Total Debt | $5M | $39.51B | $27M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $19M | $5.00B | $5M |
AMPG vs SIFY vs RFIL — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jan 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| AmpliTech Group, In… (AMPG) | 100 | 16.7 | -83.3% |
| Sify Technologies L… (SIFY) | 100 | 129.7 | +29.7% |
| RF Industries, Ltd. (RFIL) | 100 | 260.3 | +160.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: AMPG vs SIFY vs RFIL
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
AMPG is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 2.87, Low D/E 12.3%, current ratio 18.45x
SIFY is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.35, yield 0.0%
- Beta 1.35, yield 0.0%, current ratio 0.96x
- Beta 1.35 vs AMPG's 2.87
RFIL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 24.3%, EPS growth 101.1%, 3Y rev CAGR -1.9%
- 5.6% 10Y total return vs SIFY's 147.9%
- 24.3% revenue growth vs AMPG's -39.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 24.3% revenue growth vs AMPG's -39.0% | |
| Quality / Margins | 0.3% margin vs AMPG's -33.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.35 vs AMPG's 2.87 | |
| Dividends | 0.0% yield; the other 2 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +284.9% vs AMPG's +22.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 0.4% ROA vs AMPG's -16.1%, ROIC 3.6% vs -27.1% |
AMPG vs SIFY vs RFIL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
AMPG vs SIFY vs RFIL — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 3 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
RFIL leads in 3 of 6 categories
SIFY leads 1 • AMPG leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
RFIL leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SIFY is the larger business by revenue, generating $41.4B annually — 1836.2x AMPG's $23M. RFIL is the more profitable business, keeping 0.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to AMPG's -33.8%. On growth, AMPG holds the edge at +115.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $23M | $41.4B | $80M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$7M | $8.1B | $5M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$8M | -$1.5B | $270,000 |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$6M | $0 | $4M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +23.1% | +34.2% | +32.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -37.1% | +5.2% | +3.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -33.8% | -3.6% | +0.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -26.9% | -9.2% | +5.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +115.0% | +2.5% | -1.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +91.7% | -3.7% | +100.0% |
Valuation Metrics
SIFY leads this category, winning 2 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, SIFY's 18.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than RFIL's 35.4x.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $45M | $1.2B | $165M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $31M | $1.5B | $187M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -2.04x | -122.55x | 2182.86x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 26.34x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 18.53x | 35.39x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.77x | 2.80x | 2.05x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.61x | 4.77x | 4.67x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 38.04x |
Profitability & Efficiency
RFIL leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
RFIL delivers a 0.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $1 in annual profit, vs $-21 for AMPG. AMPG carries lower financial leverage with a 0.12x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SIFY's 1.96x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), RFIL scores 8/9 vs SIFY's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -21.3% | -7.7% | +0.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -16.1% | -1.8% | +0.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -27.1% | +3.3% | +3.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -23.5% | +4.4% | +5.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 3 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.12x | 1.96x | 0.76x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$15M | $34.5B | $22M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $19M | $5.0B | $5M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $5M | $39.5B | $27M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -36.85x | 0.82x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
RFIL leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in RFIL five years ago would be worth $23,875 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,104 for AMPG. Over the past 12 months, RFIL leads with a +284.9% total return vs AMPG's +22.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors RFIL at 56.6% vs AMPG's -10.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -32.9% | +33.0% | +169.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +22.9% | +273.9% | +284.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -28.6% | +119.6% | +283.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -49.0% | -9.2% | +138.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -75.0% | +147.9% | +561.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -10.6% | +30.0% | +56.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — SIFY and RFIL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SIFY is the less volatile stock with a 1.35 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AMPG's 2.87 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. RFIL currently trades 96.7% from its 52-week high vs AMPG's 45.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.87x | 1.35x | 2.11x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $4.89 | $17.85 | $15.80 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.64 | $4.15 | $3.82 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +45.0% | +91.5% | +96.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 51.5 | 61.2 | 61.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 496K | 57K | 247K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: SIFY as "Buy", RFIL as "Buy".
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 1 | 2 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.0% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.36 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
RFIL leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). SIFY leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
AMPG vs SIFY vs RFIL: Key Questions Answered
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is AMPG or SIFY or RFIL a better buy right now?
For growth investors, RF Industries, Ltd.
(RFIL) is the stronger pick with 24. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -39. 0% for AmpliTech Group, Inc. (AMPG). RF Industries, Ltd. (RFIL) offers the better valuation at 2182. 9x trailing P/E (26. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Sify Technologies Limited (SIFY) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — AMPG or SIFY or RFIL?
Over the past 5 years, RF Industries, Ltd.
(RFIL) delivered a total return of +138. 7%, compared to -49. 0% for AmpliTech Group, Inc. (AMPG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: RFIL returned +561. 0% versus AMPG's -75. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — AMPG or SIFY or RFIL?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Sify Technologies Limited (SIFY) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
35β versus AmpliTech Group, Inc. 's 2. 87β — meaning AMPG is approximately 114% more volatile than SIFY relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, AmpliTech Group, Inc. (AMPG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 12% versus 196% for Sify Technologies Limited — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — AMPG or SIFY or RFIL?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), RF Industries, Ltd.
(RFIL) is pulling ahead at 24. 3% versus -39. 0% for AmpliTech Group, Inc. (AMPG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: RF Industries, Ltd. grew EPS 101. 1% year-over-year, compared to -877. 8% for Sify Technologies Limited. Over a 3-year CAGR, AMPG leads at 21. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — AMPG or SIFY or RFIL?
RF Industries, Ltd.
(RFIL) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 1% net margin versus -118. 2% for AmpliTech Group, Inc. — meaning it keeps 0. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SIFY leads at 5. 7% versus -88. 7% for AMPG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SIFY leads at 37. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — AMPG or SIFY or RFIL?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is AMPG or SIFY or RFIL better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Sify Technologies Limited (SIFY) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+147.
9% 10Y return). AmpliTech Group, Inc. (AMPG) carries a higher beta of 2. 87 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (SIFY: +147. 9%, AMPG: -75. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between AMPG and SIFY and RFIL?
These companies operate in different sectors (AMPG (Technology) and SIFY (Communication Services) and RFIL (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: AMPG is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SIFY is a small-cap quality compounder stock; RFIL is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.