AMPY vs CIVI

For growth investors, Civitas Resources, Inc.

(CIVI) is the stronger pick with 49. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -10. 6% for Amplify Energy Corp. (AMPY). Civitas Resources, Inc. (CIVI) offers the better valuation at 3. 2x trailing P/E (6. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Amplify Energy Corp. (AMPY) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Civitas Resources, Inc.

(CIVI) is the cheapest at 3. 2x versus Amplify Energy Corp. at 6. 1x. On forward P/E, Civitas Resources, Inc. is actually cheaper at 6. 8x.

Over the past 5 years, Amplify Energy Corp.

(AMPY) delivered a total return of +120. 4%, compared to +27. 2% for Civitas Resources, Inc. (CIVI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AMPY returned +1045% versus CIVI's -87. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Amplify Energy Corp.

(AMPY) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 19β versus Civitas Resources, Inc. 's 1. 10β — meaning CIVI is approximately -681% more volatile than AMPY relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Amplify Energy Corp. (AMPY) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 68% for Civitas Resources, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Civitas Resources, Inc.

(CIVI) is pulling ahead at 49. 8% versus -10. 6% for Amplify Energy Corp. (AMPY). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Amplify Energy Corp. grew EPS 232. 3% year-over-year, compared to -6. 2% for Civitas Resources, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CIVI leads at 77. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Amplify Energy Corp.

(AMPY) is the more profitable company, earning 16. 7% net margin versus 16. 1% for Civitas Resources, Inc. — meaning it keeps 16. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AMPY leads at 29. 2% versus 29. 0% for CIVI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AMPY leads at 93. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

On forward earnings alone, Civitas Resources, Inc.

(CIVI) trades at 6. 8x forward P/E versus 23. 2x for Amplify Energy Corp. — 16. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for AMPY: 63. 7% to $10. 25.

In this comparison, CIVI (18.

2% yield) pays a dividend. AMPY does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Amplify Energy Corp.

(AMPY) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 19), +1045% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (AMPY: +1045%, CIVI: -87. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: AMPY is a small-cap deep-value stock; CIVI is a small-cap high-growth stock. CIVI pays a dividend while AMPY does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.