AMPY vs SLB

For growth investors, SLB N.

V. (SLB) is the stronger pick with -1. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -10. 6% for Amplify Energy Corp. (AMPY). Amplify Energy Corp. (AMPY) offers the better valuation at 6. 1x trailing P/E (23. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Amplify Energy Corp. (AMPY) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Amplify Energy Corp.

(AMPY) is the cheapest at 6. 1x versus SLB N. V. at 23. 8x. On forward P/E, SLB N. V. is actually cheaper at 20. 9x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

Over the past 5 years, Amplify Energy Corp.

(AMPY) delivered a total return of +120. 4%, compared to +99. 6% for SLB N. V. (SLB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AMPY returned +1045% versus SLB's -8. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Amplify Energy Corp.

(AMPY) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 19β versus SLB N. V. 's 0. 87β — meaning SLB is approximately -561% more volatile than AMPY relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Amplify Energy Corp. (AMPY) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 45% for SLB N. V. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), SLB N.

V. (SLB) is pulling ahead at -1. 6% versus -10. 6% for Amplify Energy Corp. (AMPY). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Amplify Energy Corp. grew EPS 232. 3% year-over-year, compared to -24. 4% for SLB N. V.. Over a 3-year CAGR, SLB leads at 8. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Amplify Energy Corp.

(AMPY) is the more profitable company, earning 16. 7% net margin versus 9. 4% for SLB N. V. — meaning it keeps 16. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AMPY leads at 29. 2% versus 15. 3% for SLB. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AMPY leads at 93. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

On forward earnings alone, SLB N.

V. (SLB) trades at 20. 9x forward P/E versus 23. 2x for Amplify Energy Corp. — 2. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for AMPY: 63. 7% to $10. 25.

In this comparison, SLB (1.

9% yield) pays a dividend. AMPY does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Amplify Energy Corp.

(AMPY) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 19), +1045% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (AMPY: +1045%, SLB: -8. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: AMPY is a small-cap deep-value stock; SLB is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. SLB pays a dividend while AMPY does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.