Oil & Gas Exploration & Production
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
AMPY vs SOC vs CIVI vs TALO
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Oil & Gas Drilling
Oil & Gas Exploration & Production
Oil & Gas Exploration & Production
AMPY vs SOC vs CIVI vs TALO — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production | Oil & Gas Drilling | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production |
| Market Cap | $221M | $1.84T | $2.34B | $2.49B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $263M | $1M | $4.71B | $1.74B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $44M | $-498M | $638M | $-743M |
| Gross Margin | 93.2% | -8.7% | 43.9% | 2.3% |
| Operating Margin | 29.2% | -367.6% | 31.1% | -24.9% |
| Forward P/E | 20.1x | 7.5x | 6.8x | — |
| Total Debt | $3M | $0.00 | $4.49B | $1.24B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $61M | $98M | $76M | $363M |
AMPY vs SOC vs CIVI vs TALO — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Apr 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Amplify Energy Corp. (AMPY) | 100 | 203.4 | +103.4% |
| Sable Offshore Corp. (SOC) | 100 | 132.5 | +32.5% |
| Civitas Resources, … (CIVI) | 100 | 81.9 | -18.1% |
| Talos Energy Inc. (TALO) | 100 | 133.3 | +33.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: AMPY vs SOC vs CIVI vs TALO
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
AMPY carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.
- 9.0% 10Y total return vs SOC's 32.4%
- 16.7% margin vs SOC's -391.5%
- +101.9% vs SOC's -36.8%
- 6.2% ROA vs SOC's -28.9%, ROIC 12.3% vs -44.6%
SOC lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
CIVI is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 49.8%, EPS growth -6.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 77.5%
- 49.8% revenue growth vs AMPY's -10.6%
- Better valuation composite
- 18.2% yield; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend
TALO is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.06
- Lower volatility, beta 0.06, Low D/E 57.3%, current ratio 1.30x
- Beta 0.06, current ratio 1.30x
- Beta 0.06 vs SOC's 1.51
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 49.8% revenue growth vs AMPY's -10.6% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 16.7% margin vs SOC's -391.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.06 vs SOC's 1.51 | |
| Dividends | 18.2% yield; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +101.9% vs SOC's -36.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.2% ROA vs SOC's -28.9%, ROIC 12.3% vs -44.6% |
AMPY vs SOC vs CIVI vs TALO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
AMPY vs SOC vs CIVI vs TALO — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
AMPY leads in 3 of 6 categories
CIVI leads 1 • TALO leads 1 • SOC leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AMPY leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CIVI is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.7B annually — 3702.4x SOC's $1M. AMPY is the more profitable business, keeping 16.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SOC's -391.5%. On growth, TALO holds the edge at -7.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $263M | $1M | $4.7B | $1.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $109M | -$454M | $3.4B | $437M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $44M | -$498M | $638M | -$743M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$13.5B | -$611M | $934M | $489M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +93.2% | -8.7% | +43.9% | +2.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +29.2% | -367.6% | +31.1% | -24.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +16.7% | -391.5% | +13.6% | -42.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -51.1% | -480.4% | +19.8% | +28.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -18.1% | — | -8.1% | -7.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +8394.1% | -5.4% | -33.9% | -29.4% |
Valuation Metrics
CIVI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 3.2x trailing earnings, CIVI trades at a 39% valuation discount to AMPY's 5.3x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, AMPY's 1.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than TALO's 3.1x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $221M | $1.84T | $2.3B | $2.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $163M | $1.84T | $6.8B | $3.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 5.27x | -3.07x | 3.24x | -5.29x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 20.11x | 7.50x | 6.75x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 0.15x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 1.49x | — | 1.89x | 3.13x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.84x | — | 0.45x | 1.40x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.48x | 2359.43x | 0.41x | 1.20x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 2.61x | 5.48x |
Profitability & Efficiency
AMPY leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
AMPY delivers a 10.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $11 in annual profit, vs $-114 for SOC. AMPY carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CIVI's 0.68x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AMPY scores 7/9 vs SOC's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +10.6% | -113.8% | +9.5% | -33.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +6.2% | -28.9% | +4.2% | -13.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +12.3% | -44.6% | +10.8% | -2.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +12.6% | -37.5% | +12.1% | -2.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 2 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.01x | — | 0.68x | 0.57x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$58M | -$98M | $4.4B | $879M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $61M | $98M | $76M | $363M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $3M | $0 | $4.5B | $1.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | -2.28x | 2.80x | -2.36x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
AMPY leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in AMPY five years ago would be worth $18,100 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $11,884 for TALO. Over the past 12 months, AMPY leads with a +101.9% total return vs SOC's -36.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SOC at 8.2% vs CIVI's -16.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +17.3% | +9.5% | -1.5% | +32.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +101.9% | -36.8% | +6.8% | +100.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -21.9% | +26.5% | -41.7% | +13.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +81.0% | +32.6% | +31.9% | +18.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +904.1% | +32.4% | -86.2% | -59.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -7.9% | +8.2% | -16.5% | +4.3% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — AMPY and TALO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
AMPY is the less volatile stock with a -0.19 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SOC's 1.51 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TALO currently trades 87.7% from its 52-week high vs SOC's 36.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | -0.19x | 1.51x | 1.10x | 0.06x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $6.79 | $35.00 | $37.45 | $17.00 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.60 | $3.72 | $25.38 | $7.27 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +80.0% | +36.7% | +73.1% | +87.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 41.4 | 45.8 | 54.8 | 49.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.0M | 5.4M | 22.4M | 2.3M |
Analyst Outlook
TALO leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: AMPY as "Buy", SOC as "Buy", CIVI as "Hold", TALO as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 110.3% upside for SOC (target: $27) vs -7.8% for TALO (target: $14). CIVI is the only dividend payer here at 18.19% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $10.25 | $27.00 | $31.00 | $13.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 5 | 4 | 16 | 13 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +18.2% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | — | 0 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $4.98 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +18.3% | +4.8% |
AMPY leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). CIVI leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
AMPY vs SOC vs CIVI vs TALO: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is AMPY or SOC or CIVI or TALO a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Civitas Resources, Inc.
(CIVI) is the stronger pick with 49. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -10. 6% for Amplify Energy Corp. (AMPY). Civitas Resources, Inc. (CIVI) offers the better valuation at 3. 2x trailing P/E (6. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Amplify Energy Corp. (AMPY) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — AMPY or SOC or CIVI or TALO?
On trailing P/E, Civitas Resources, Inc.
(CIVI) is the cheapest at 3. 2x versus Amplify Energy Corp. at 5. 3x. On forward P/E, Civitas Resources, Inc. is actually cheaper at 6. 8x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — AMPY or SOC or CIVI or TALO?
Over the past 5 years, Amplify Energy Corp.
(AMPY) delivered a total return of +81. 0%, compared to +18. 8% for Talos Energy Inc. (TALO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AMPY returned +904. 1% versus CIVI's -86. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — AMPY or SOC or CIVI or TALO?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Amplify Energy Corp.
(AMPY) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 19β versus Sable Offshore Corp. 's 1. 51β — meaning SOC is approximately -904% more volatile than AMPY relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Amplify Energy Corp. (AMPY) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 68% for Civitas Resources, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — AMPY or SOC or CIVI or TALO?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Civitas Resources, Inc.
(CIVI) is pulling ahead at 49. 8% versus -10. 6% for Amplify Energy Corp. (AMPY). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Amplify Energy Corp. grew EPS 232. 3% year-over-year, compared to -555. 8% for Talos Energy Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CIVI leads at 77. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — AMPY or SOC or CIVI or TALO?
Amplify Energy Corp.
(AMPY) is the more profitable company, earning 16. 7% net margin versus -391. 5% for Sable Offshore Corp. — meaning it keeps 16. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AMPY leads at 29. 2% versus -367. 6% for SOC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AMPY leads at 93. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is AMPY or SOC or CIVI or TALO more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Civitas Resources, Inc.
(CIVI) trades at 6. 8x forward P/E versus 20. 1x for Amplify Energy Corp. — 13. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SOC: 110. 3% to $27. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — AMPY or SOC or CIVI or TALO?
In this comparison, CIVI (18.
2% yield) pays a dividend. AMPY, SOC, TALO do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is AMPY or SOC or CIVI or TALO better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Amplify Energy Corp.
(AMPY) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 19), +904. 1% 10Y return). Sable Offshore Corp. (SOC) carries a higher beta of 1. 51 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (AMPY: +904. 1%, SOC: +32. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between AMPY and SOC and CIVI and TALO?
Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: AMPY is a small-cap deep-value stock; SOC is a mega-cap quality compounder stock; CIVI is a small-cap high-growth stock; TALO is a small-cap quality compounder stock. CIVI pays a dividend while AMPY, SOC, TALO do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.