Engineering & Construction
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
AMRC vs TPVG vs AEYE vs PESI vs MYRG
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Asset Management
Software - Application
Waste Management
Engineering & Construction
AMRC vs TPVG vs AEYE vs PESI vs MYRG — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Engineering & Construction | Asset Management | Software - Application | Waste Management | Engineering & Construction |
| Market Cap | $1.57B | $243M | $100M | $207M | $6.65B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.98B | $97M | $40M | $59M | $3.82B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $31M | $-12M | $-3M | $-18M | $142M |
| Gross Margin | 15.6% | 83.5% | 78.3% | 4.1% | 11.9% |
| Operating Margin | 6.3% | 77.9% | -7.9% | -26.3% | 5.1% |
| Forward P/E | 25.0x | 6.5x | — | — | 44.0x |
| Total Debt | $1.95B | $469M | $721K | $4M | $104M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $72M | $20M | $5M | $12M | $150M |
AMRC vs TPVG vs AEYE vs PESI vs MYRG — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ameresco, Inc. (AMRC) | 100 | 138.3 | +38.3% |
| TriplePoint Venture… (TPVG) | 100 | 59.8 | -40.2% |
| AudioEye, Inc. (AEYE) | 100 | 95.5 | -4.5% |
| Perma-Fix Environme… (PESI) | 100 | 199.8 | +99.8% |
| MYR Group Inc. (MYRG) | 100 | 1483.4 | +1383.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: AMRC vs TPVG vs AEYE vs PESI vs MYRG
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
AMRC plays a supporting role in this comparison — it may shine differently against other peers.
TPVG carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 36.6%, EPS growth 48.8%
- 36.6% NII/revenue growth vs PESI's 4.3%
- Better valuation composite
- 50.6% margin vs PESI's -30.1%
AEYE lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
PESI is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.85, Low D/E 8.6%, current ratio 1.61x
- Beta 1.85, current ratio 1.61x
MYRG is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 1.70
- 16.8% 10Y total return vs PESI's 178.6%
- PEG 2.64 vs TPVG's 6.41
- +175.2% vs AEYE's -27.9%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 36.6% NII/revenue growth vs PESI's 4.3% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 50.6% margin vs PESI's -30.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.83 vs AEYE's 2.29 | |
| Dividends | 17.1% yield; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +175.2% vs AEYE's -27.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 8.7% ROA vs PESI's -20.2%, ROIC 18.3% vs -21.7% |
AMRC vs TPVG vs AEYE vs PESI vs MYRG — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
AMRC vs TPVG vs AEYE vs PESI vs MYRG — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
MYRG leads in 3 of 6 categories
TPVG leads 1 • AMRC leads 0 • AEYE leads 0 • PESI leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — TPVG and MYRG each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MYRG is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.8B annually — 94.9x AEYE's $40M. TPVG is the more profitable business, keeping 50.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PESI's -30.1%. On growth, MYRG holds the edge at +20.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2.0B | $97M | $40M | $59M | $3.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $204M | -$22M | -$504,000 | -$14M | $261M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $31M | -$12M | -$3M | -$18M | $142M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$251M | $35M | $2M | -$14M | $231M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +15.6% | +83.5% | +78.3% | +4.1% | +11.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +6.3% | +77.9% | -7.9% | -26.3% | +5.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +1.6% | +50.6% | -7.6% | -30.1% | +3.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -12.7% | -58.7% | +5.5% | -23.4% | +6.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +13.8% | — | +7.9% | -20.1% | +20.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -2.5% | -2.3% | +29.0% | -110.5% | +106.2% |
Valuation Metrics
TPVG leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 4.9x trailing earnings, TPVG trades at a 91% valuation discount to MYRG's 56.8x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), MYRG offers better value at 3.40x vs TPVG's 4.84x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.6B | $243M | $100M | $207M | $6.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3.4B | $691M | $96M | $200M | $6.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 35.76x | 4.91x | -32.36x | -14.89x | 56.76x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 25.04x | 6.50x | — | — | 44.03x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 4.84x | — | — | 3.40x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 15.00x | 9.13x | — | — | 28.84x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.81x | 2.50x | 2.49x | 3.36x | 1.82x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.41x | 0.68x | 20.91x | 4.11x | 10.18x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | — | 28.66x |
Profitability & Efficiency
MYRG leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MYRG delivers a 22.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $22 in annual profit, vs $-48 for AEYE. PESI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.09x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to AMRC's 1.73x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MYRG scores 8/9 vs AEYE's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +2.9% | -3.4% | -47.8% | -34.5% | +22.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.7% | -1.5% | -9.5% | -20.2% | +8.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +3.3% | +7.2% | -42.4% | -21.7% | +18.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +3.7% | +9.4% | -17.7% | -16.7% | +19.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.73x | 1.33x | 0.15x | 0.09x | 0.16x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.9B | $449M | -$5M | -$7M | -$47M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $72M | $20M | $5M | $12M | $150M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.9B | $469M | $721,000 | $4M | $104M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.20x | -1.02x | -2.79x | -42.14x | 39.49x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MYRG leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MYRG five years ago would be worth $51,760 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,977 for AEYE. Over the past 12 months, MYRG leads with a +175.2% total return vs AEYE's -27.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MYRG at 47.3% vs AMRC's -11.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -3.2% | -6.3% | -18.7% | -8.8% | +88.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +134.3% | +19.3% | -27.9% | +26.2% | +175.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -29.9% | -3.4% | +20.6% | +21.7% | +219.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -44.0% | -13.5% | -60.2% | +45.6% | +417.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +542.4% | +93.3% | +102.2% | +178.6% | +1680.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -11.2% | -1.2% | +6.4% | +6.8% | +47.3% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — TPVG and MYRG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TPVG is the less volatile stock with a 0.83 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AEYE's 2.29 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MYRG currently trades 89.9% from its 52-week high vs AEYE's 49.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.03x | 0.83x | 2.29x | 1.85x | 1.70x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $44.93 | $7.53 | $16.39 | $16.50 | $475.39 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $12.37 | $4.48 | $5.31 | $8.02 | $152.10 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +66.1% | +79.5% | +49.4% | +67.7% | +89.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 68.0 | 58.3 | 61.3 | 41.5 | 80.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 507K | 504K | 194K | 164K | 306K |
Analyst Outlook
MYRG leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: AMRC as "Buy", TPVG as "Hold", PESI as "Hold", MYRG as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 61.1% upside for PESI (target: $18) vs -15.3% for MYRG (target: $362). TPVG is the only dividend payer here at 17.11% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | — | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $43.17 | $8.95 | — | $18.00 | $362.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 23 | 12 | — | 1 | 21 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +17.1% | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $1.02 | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +1.2% |
MYRG leads in 3 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). TPVG leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
AMRC vs TPVG vs AEYE vs PESI vs MYRG: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is AMRC or TPVG or AEYE or PESI or MYRG a better buy right now?
For growth investors, TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.
(TPVG) is the stronger pick with 36. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 4. 3% for Perma-Fix Environmental Services, Inc. (PESI). TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. (TPVG) offers the better valuation at 4. 9x trailing P/E (6. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Ameresco, Inc. (AMRC) a "Buy" — based on 23 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — AMRC or TPVG or AEYE or PESI or MYRG?
On trailing P/E, TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.
(TPVG) is the cheapest at 4. 9x versus MYR Group Inc. at 56. 8x. On forward P/E, TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. is actually cheaper at 6. 5x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: MYR Group Inc. wins at 2. 64x versus TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. 's 6. 41x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — AMRC or TPVG or AEYE or PESI or MYRG?
Over the past 5 years, MYR Group Inc.
(MYRG) delivered a total return of +417. 6%, compared to -60. 2% for AudioEye, Inc. (AEYE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MYRG returned +1681% versus TPVG's +93. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — AMRC or TPVG or AEYE or PESI or MYRG?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.
(TPVG) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 83β versus AudioEye, Inc. 's 2. 29β — meaning AEYE is approximately 175% more volatile than TPVG relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Perma-Fix Environmental Services, Inc. (PESI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 9% versus 173% for Ameresco, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — AMRC or TPVG or AEYE or PESI or MYRG?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.
(TPVG) is pulling ahead at 36. 6% versus 4. 3% for Perma-Fix Environmental Services, Inc. (PESI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: MYR Group Inc. grew EPS 311. 5% year-over-year, compared to -22. 4% for Ameresco, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, AEYE leads at 10. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — AMRC or TPVG or AEYE or PESI or MYRG?
TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.
(TPVG) is the more profitable company, earning 50. 6% net margin versus -22. 3% for Perma-Fix Environmental Services, Inc. — meaning it keeps 50. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TPVG leads at 77. 9% versus -19. 0% for PESI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TPVG leads at 83. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is AMRC or TPVG or AEYE or PESI or MYRG more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, MYR Group Inc. (MYRG) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 2. 64x versus TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. 's 6. 41x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. (TPVG) trades at 6. 5x forward P/E versus 44. 0x for MYR Group Inc. — 37. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PESI: 61. 1% to $18. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — AMRC or TPVG or AEYE or PESI or MYRG?
In this comparison, TPVG (17.
1% yield) pays a dividend. AMRC, AEYE, PESI, MYRG do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is AMRC or TPVG or AEYE or PESI or MYRG better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.
(TPVG) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 83), 17. 1% yield). AudioEye, Inc. (AEYE) carries a higher beta of 2. 29 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (TPVG: +93. 3%, AEYE: +102. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between AMRC and TPVG and AEYE and PESI and MYRG?
These companies operate in different sectors (AMRC (Industrials) and TPVG (Financial Services) and AEYE (Technology) and PESI (Industrials) and MYRG (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: AMRC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; TPVG is a small-cap high-growth stock; AEYE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PESI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MYRG is a small-cap quality compounder stock. TPVG pays a dividend while AMRC, AEYE, PESI, MYRG do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.