Engineering & Construction
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
AMRC vs TTEK vs MYRG vs PWR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Engineering & Construction
Engineering & Construction
Engineering & Construction
AMRC vs TTEK vs MYRG vs PWR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Engineering & Construction | Engineering & Construction | Engineering & Construction | Engineering & Construction |
| Market Cap | $1.57B | $8.00B | $6.65B | $112.65B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.98B | $4.91B | $3.82B | $29.99B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $31M | $440M | $142M | $1.12B |
| Gross Margin | 15.6% | 19.5% | 11.9% | 13.6% |
| Operating Margin | 6.3% | 12.4% | 5.1% | 5.8% |
| Forward P/E | 25.0x | 20.0x | 44.0x | 57.4x |
| Total Debt | $1.95B | $987M | $104M | $1.19B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $72M | $167M | $150M | $440M |
AMRC vs TTEK vs MYRG vs PWR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ameresco, Inc. (AMRC) | 100 | 138.3 | +38.3% |
| Tetra Tech, Inc. (TTEK) | 100 | 194.5 | +94.5% |
| MYR Group Inc. (MYRG) | 100 | 1483.4 | +1383.4% |
| Quanta Services, In… (PWR) | 100 | 2032.8 | +1932.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: AMRC vs TTEK vs MYRG vs PWR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
AMRC lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
TTEK carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 12 yrs, beta 0.53, yield 0.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.53, Low D/E 55.5%, current ratio 1.18x
- PEG 2.47 vs PWR's 3.33
- Beta 0.53, yield 0.8%, current ratio 1.18x
MYRG is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if momentum is your priority.
- +175.2% vs TTEK's +0.2%
PWR is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 19.8%, EPS growth 12.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 18.4%
- 31.4% 10Y total return vs MYRG's 16.8%
- 19.8% revenue growth vs TTEK's 4.7%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 19.8% revenue growth vs TTEK's 4.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (20.0x vs 57.4x), PEG 2.47 vs 3.33 | |
| Quality / Margins | 9.0% margin vs AMRC's 1.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.53 vs AMRC's 2.03, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 0.8% yield, 12-year raise streak, vs PWR's 0.1%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +175.2% vs TTEK's +0.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 10.2% ROA vs AMRC's 0.7%, ROIC 17.4% vs 3.3% |
AMRC vs TTEK vs MYRG vs PWR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
AMRC vs TTEK vs MYRG vs PWR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
TTEK leads in 3 of 6 categories
MYRG leads 1 • PWR leads 1 • AMRC leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TTEK leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PWR is the larger business by revenue, generating $30.0B annually — 15.1x AMRC's $2.0B. TTEK is the more profitable business, keeping 9.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to AMRC's 1.6%. On growth, PWR holds the edge at +26.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2.0B | $4.9B | $3.8B | $30.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $204M | $666M | $261M | $2.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $31M | $440M | $142M | $1.1B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$251M | $669M | $231M | $1.7B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +15.6% | +19.5% | +11.9% | +13.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +6.3% | +12.4% | +5.1% | +5.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +1.6% | +9.0% | +3.7% | +3.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -12.7% | +13.6% | +6.0% | +5.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +13.8% | +10.6% | +20.0% | +26.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -2.5% | +16.8% | +106.2% | +51.0% |
Valuation Metrics
TTEK leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 33.0x trailing earnings, TTEK trades at a 70% valuation discount to PWR's 110.4x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), MYRG offers better value at 3.40x vs PWR's 6.40x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.6B | $8.0B | $6.7B | $112.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3.4B | $8.8B | $6.6B | $113.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 35.76x | 33.00x | 56.76x | 110.40x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 25.04x | 20.04x | 44.03x | 57.40x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 4.07x | 3.40x | 6.40x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 15.00x | 13.28x | 28.84x | 45.68x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.81x | 1.47x | 1.82x | 3.97x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.41x | 4.61x | 10.18x | 12.61x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 18.23x | 28.66x | 69.50x |
Profitability & Efficiency
MYRG leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TTEK delivers a 24.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $24 in annual profit, vs $3 for AMRC. PWR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.13x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to AMRC's 1.73x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MYRG scores 8/9 vs PWR's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +2.9% | +24.4% | +22.1% | +13.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.7% | +10.2% | +8.7% | +4.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +3.3% | +17.4% | +18.3% | +11.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +3.7% | +20.6% | +19.4% | +11.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 7 | 8 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.73x | 0.55x | 0.16x | 0.13x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.9B | $820M | -$47M | $748M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $72M | $167M | $150M | $440M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.9B | $987M | $104M | $1.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.20x | 19.86x | 39.49x | 6.27x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
PWR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in PWR five years ago would be worth $75,108 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,600 for AMRC. Over the past 12 months, MYRG leads with a +175.2% total return vs TTEK's +0.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PWR at 64.5% vs AMRC's -11.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -3.2% | -8.6% | +88.5% | +70.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +134.3% | +0.2% | +175.2% | +132.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -29.9% | +11.5% | +219.8% | +345.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -44.0% | +28.0% | +417.6% | +651.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +542.4% | +450.1% | +1680.8% | +3143.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -11.2% | +3.7% | +47.3% | +64.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — TTEK and PWR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TTEK is the less volatile stock with a 0.53 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AMRC's 2.03 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PWR currently trades 95.2% from its 52-week high vs AMRC's 66.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.03x | 0.53x | 1.70x | 1.30x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $44.93 | $43.14 | $475.39 | $788.72 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $12.37 | $29.59 | $152.10 | $315.45 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +66.1% | +71.1% | +89.9% | +95.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 68.0 | 42.7 | 80.7 | 87.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 507K | 2.7M | 306K | 1.1M |
Analyst Outlook
TTEK leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: AMRC as "Buy", TTEK as "Hold", MYRG as "Hold", PWR as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 45.5% upside for AMRC (target: $43) vs -15.3% for MYRG (target: $362). TTEK is the only dividend payer here at 0.79% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $43.17 | $41.50 | $362.00 | $647.23 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 23 | 26 | 21 | 35 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.8% | — | +0.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 12 | 4 | 7 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.24 | — | $0.40 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +3.1% | +1.2% | +0.1% |
TTEK leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). MYRG leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 1 tied.
AMRC vs TTEK vs MYRG vs PWR: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is AMRC or TTEK or MYRG or PWR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Quanta Services, Inc.
(PWR) is the stronger pick with 19. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 4. 7% for Tetra Tech, Inc. (TTEK). Tetra Tech, Inc. (TTEK) offers the better valuation at 33. 0x trailing P/E (20. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Ameresco, Inc. (AMRC) a "Buy" — based on 23 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — AMRC or TTEK or MYRG or PWR?
On trailing P/E, Tetra Tech, Inc.
(TTEK) is the cheapest at 33. 0x versus Quanta Services, Inc. at 110. 4x. On forward P/E, Tetra Tech, Inc. is actually cheaper at 20. 0x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Tetra Tech, Inc. wins at 2. 47x versus Quanta Services, Inc. 's 3. 33x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — AMRC or TTEK or MYRG or PWR?
Over the past 5 years, Quanta Services, Inc.
(PWR) delivered a total return of +651. 1%, compared to -44. 0% for Ameresco, Inc. (AMRC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PWR returned +31. 4% versus TTEK's +450. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — AMRC or TTEK or MYRG or PWR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Tetra Tech, Inc.
(TTEK) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 53β versus Ameresco, Inc. 's 2. 03β — meaning AMRC is approximately 279% more volatile than TTEK relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Quanta Services, Inc. (PWR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 13% versus 173% for Ameresco, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — AMRC or TTEK or MYRG or PWR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Quanta Services, Inc.
(PWR) is pulling ahead at 19. 8% versus 4. 7% for Tetra Tech, Inc. (TTEK). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: MYR Group Inc. grew EPS 311. 5% year-over-year, compared to -24. 4% for Tetra Tech, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, TTEK leads at 24. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — AMRC or TTEK or MYRG or PWR?
Tetra Tech, Inc.
(TTEK) is the more profitable company, earning 4. 6% net margin versus 2. 3% for Ameresco, Inc. — meaning it keeps 4. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TTEK leads at 11. 1% versus 4. 4% for MYRG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TTEK leads at 17. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is AMRC or TTEK or MYRG or PWR more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Tetra Tech, Inc. (TTEK) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 2. 47x versus Quanta Services, Inc. 's 3. 33x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, Tetra Tech, Inc. (TTEK) trades at 20. 0x forward P/E versus 57. 4x for Quanta Services, Inc. — 37. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for AMRC: 45. 5% to $43. 17.
08Which pays a better dividend — AMRC or TTEK or MYRG or PWR?
In this comparison, TTEK (0.
8% yield) pays a dividend. AMRC, MYRG, PWR do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is AMRC or TTEK or MYRG or PWR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Tetra Tech, Inc.
(TTEK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 53), 0. 8% yield, +450. 1% 10Y return). Ameresco, Inc. (AMRC) carries a higher beta of 2. 03 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (TTEK: +450. 1%, AMRC: +542. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between AMRC and TTEK and MYRG and PWR?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: AMRC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; TTEK is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MYRG is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PWR is a mid-cap high-growth stock. TTEK pays a dividend while AMRC, MYRG, PWR do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.