Engineering & Construction
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
AMRC vs TTEK vs MYRG vs PWR vs PRIM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Engineering & Construction
Engineering & Construction
Engineering & Construction
Engineering & Construction
AMRC vs TTEK vs MYRG vs PWR vs PRIM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Engineering & Construction | Engineering & Construction | Engineering & Construction | Engineering & Construction | Engineering & Construction |
| Market Cap | $1.59B | $7.90B | $6.82B | $111.76B | $5.68B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.98B | $4.91B | $3.82B | $29.99B | $7.49B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $31M | $440M | $142M | $1.12B | $248M |
| Gross Margin | 15.6% | 19.5% | 11.9% | 13.6% | 10.4% |
| Operating Margin | 6.3% | 12.4% | 5.1% | 5.8% | 4.9% |
| Forward P/E | 26.8x | 19.6x | 40.3x | 53.5x | 20.2x |
| Total Debt | $1.95B | $987M | $104M | $1.19B | $1.28B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $72M | $167M | $150M | $440M | $541M |
AMRC vs TTEK vs MYRG vs PWR vs PRIM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ameresco, Inc. (AMRC) | 100 | 139.6 | +39.6% |
| Tetra Tech, Inc. (TTEK) | 100 | 192.0 | +92.0% |
| MYR Group Inc. (MYRG) | 100 | 1519.8 | +1419.8% |
| Quanta Services, In… (PWR) | 100 | 2016.8 | +1916.8% |
| Primoris Services C… (PRIM) | 100 | 627.9 | +527.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: AMRC vs TTEK vs MYRG vs PWR vs PRIM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Among these 5 stocks, AMRC doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
TTEK carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 12 yrs, beta 0.47, yield 0.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.47, Low D/E 55.5%, current ratio 1.18x
- Beta 0.47, yield 0.8%, current ratio 1.18x
- 9.0% margin vs AMRC's 1.6%
MYRG is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if momentum is your priority.
- +182.4% vs TTEK's -12.4%
PWR ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 19.8%, EPS growth 12.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 18.4%
- 31.2% 10Y total return vs MYRG's 17.2%
- 19.8% revenue growth vs TTEK's 4.7%
PRIM is the clearest fit if your priority is valuation efficiency.
- PEG 1.10 vs PWR's 3.10
- Lower P/E (20.2x vs 53.5x), PEG 1.10 vs 3.10
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 19.8% revenue growth vs TTEK's 4.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (20.2x vs 53.5x), PEG 1.10 vs 3.10 | |
| Quality / Margins | 9.0% margin vs AMRC's 1.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.47 vs AMRC's 2.03, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 0.8% yield, 12-year raise streak, vs PWR's 0.1%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +182.4% vs TTEK's -12.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 10.2% ROA vs AMRC's 0.7%, ROIC 17.4% vs 3.3% |
AMRC vs TTEK vs MYRG vs PWR vs PRIM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
AMRC vs TTEK vs MYRG vs PWR vs PRIM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
TTEK leads in 2 of 6 categories
PRIM leads 1 • MYRG leads 1 • PWR leads 1 • AMRC leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TTEK leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PWR is the larger business by revenue, generating $30.0B annually — 15.1x AMRC's $2.0B. TTEK is the more profitable business, keeping 9.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to AMRC's 1.6%. On growth, PWR holds the edge at +26.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2.0B | $4.9B | $3.8B | $30.0B | $7.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $204M | $666M | $261M | $2.4B | $437M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $31M | $440M | $142M | $1.1B | $248M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$251M | $669M | $231M | $1.7B | $165M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +15.6% | +19.5% | +11.9% | +13.6% | +10.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +6.3% | +12.4% | +5.1% | +5.8% | +4.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +1.6% | +9.0% | +3.7% | +3.7% | +3.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -12.7% | +13.6% | +6.0% | +5.6% | +2.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +13.8% | +10.6% | +20.0% | +26.3% | -5.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -2.5% | +16.8% | +106.2% | +51.0% | -60.5% |
Valuation Metrics
PRIM leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 20.9x trailing earnings, PRIM trades at a 81% valuation discount to PWR's 109.5x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), PRIM offers better value at 1.14x vs PWR's 6.35x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.6B | $7.9B | $6.8B | $111.8B | $5.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3.5B | $8.7B | $6.8B | $112.5B | $6.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 36.10x | 32.57x | 58.15x | 109.53x | 20.88x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 26.76x | 19.59x | 40.31x | 53.49x | 20.22x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 4.02x | 3.48x | 6.35x | 1.14x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 15.06x | 13.12x | 29.55x | 45.32x | 12.69x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.82x | 1.45x | 1.86x | 3.94x | 0.75x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.42x | 4.55x | 10.43x | 12.51x | 3.42x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 17.99x | 29.36x | 68.95x | 16.69x |
Profitability & Efficiency
MYRG leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TTEK delivers a 24.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $24 in annual profit, vs $3 for AMRC. PWR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.13x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to AMRC's 1.73x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MYRG scores 8/9 vs PWR's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +2.9% | +24.4% | +22.1% | +13.0% | +15.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.7% | +10.2% | +8.7% | +4.8% | +5.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +3.3% | +17.4% | +18.3% | +11.8% | +13.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +3.7% | +20.6% | +19.4% | +11.3% | +16.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 7 | 8 | 4 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.73x | 0.55x | 0.16x | 0.13x | 0.76x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.9B | $820M | -$47M | $748M | $735M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $72M | $167M | $150M | $440M | $541M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.9B | $987M | $104M | $1.2B | $1.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.20x | 19.86x | 39.49x | 6.27x | 21.02x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
PWR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in PWR five years ago would be worth $74,205 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6,075 for AMRC. Over the past 12 months, MYRG leads with a +182.4% total return vs TTEK's -12.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PWR at 64.1% vs AMRC's -10.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -2.3% | -9.8% | +93.1% | +69.4% | -19.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +127.1% | -12.4% | +182.4% | +128.4% | +53.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -29.3% | +10.0% | +227.6% | +341.7% | +333.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -39.3% | +30.0% | +441.6% | +642.0% | +229.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +548.5% | +443.3% | +1724.4% | +3118.4% | +387.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -10.9% | +3.2% | +48.5% | +64.1% | +63.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — TTEK and PWR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TTEK is the less volatile stock with a 0.47 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AMRC's 2.03 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PWR currently trades 94.4% from its 52-week high vs PRIM's 51.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.03x | 0.47x | 1.65x | 1.32x | 1.37x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $44.93 | $43.14 | $475.39 | $788.72 | $205.50 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $12.51 | $29.59 | $152.93 | $320.56 | $67.15 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +66.7% | +70.2% | +92.1% | +94.4% | +51.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 56.8 | 39.8 | 69.1 | 73.6 | 33.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 506K | 2.6M | 297K | 1.1M | 1.1M |
Analyst Outlook
TTEK leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: AMRC as "Buy", TTEK as "Hold", MYRG as "Hold", PWR as "Buy", PRIM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 57.1% upside for PRIM (target: $165) vs -10.7% for PWR (target: $665). For income investors, TTEK offers the higher dividend yield at 0.80% vs PRIM's 0.30%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $41.00 | $41.50 | $412.67 | $665.29 | $164.63 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 23 | 26 | 21 | 35 | 23 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.8% | — | +0.1% | +0.3% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 12 | 4 | 7 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.24 | — | $0.40 | $0.32 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +3.2% | +1.1% | +0.1% | +0.2% |
TTEK leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Analyst Outlook). PRIM leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
AMRC vs TTEK vs MYRG vs PWR vs PRIM: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is AMRC or TTEK or MYRG or PWR or PRIM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Quanta Services, Inc.
(PWR) is the stronger pick with 19. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 4. 7% for Tetra Tech, Inc. (TTEK). Primoris Services Corporation (PRIM) offers the better valuation at 20. 9x trailing P/E (20. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Ameresco, Inc. (AMRC) a "Buy" — based on 23 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — AMRC or TTEK or MYRG or PWR or PRIM?
On trailing P/E, Primoris Services Corporation (PRIM) is the cheapest at 20.
9x versus Quanta Services, Inc. at 109. 5x. On forward P/E, Tetra Tech, Inc. is actually cheaper at 19. 6x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Primoris Services Corporation wins at 1. 10x versus Quanta Services, Inc. 's 3. 10x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — AMRC or TTEK or MYRG or PWR or PRIM?
Over the past 5 years, Quanta Services, Inc.
(PWR) delivered a total return of +642. 0%, compared to -39. 3% for Ameresco, Inc. (AMRC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PWR returned +31. 2% versus PRIM's +387. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — AMRC or TTEK or MYRG or PWR or PRIM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Tetra Tech, Inc.
(TTEK) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 47β versus Ameresco, Inc. 's 2. 03β — meaning AMRC is approximately 336% more volatile than TTEK relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Quanta Services, Inc. (PWR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 13% versus 173% for Ameresco, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — AMRC or TTEK or MYRG or PWR or PRIM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Quanta Services, Inc.
(PWR) is pulling ahead at 19. 8% versus 4. 7% for Tetra Tech, Inc. (TTEK). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: MYR Group Inc. grew EPS 311. 5% year-over-year, compared to -24. 4% for Tetra Tech, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, TTEK leads at 24. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — AMRC or TTEK or MYRG or PWR or PRIM?
Tetra Tech, Inc.
(TTEK) is the more profitable company, earning 4. 6% net margin versus 2. 3% for Ameresco, Inc. — meaning it keeps 4. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TTEK leads at 11. 1% versus 4. 4% for MYRG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TTEK leads at 17. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is AMRC or TTEK or MYRG or PWR or PRIM more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Primoris Services Corporation (PRIM) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 10x versus Quanta Services, Inc. 's 3. 10x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, Tetra Tech, Inc. (TTEK) trades at 19. 6x forward P/E versus 53. 5x for Quanta Services, Inc. — 33. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PRIM: 57. 1% to $164. 63.
08Which pays a better dividend — AMRC or TTEK or MYRG or PWR or PRIM?
In this comparison, TTEK (0.
8% yield), PRIM (0. 3% yield) pay a dividend. AMRC, MYRG, PWR do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is AMRC or TTEK or MYRG or PWR or PRIM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Tetra Tech, Inc.
(TTEK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 47), 0. 8% yield, +443. 3% 10Y return). Ameresco, Inc. (AMRC) carries a higher beta of 2. 03 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (TTEK: +443. 3%, AMRC: +548. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between AMRC and TTEK and MYRG and PWR and PRIM?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: AMRC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; TTEK is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MYRG is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PWR is a mid-cap high-growth stock; PRIM is a small-cap high-growth stock. TTEK pays a dividend while AMRC, MYRG, PWR, PRIM do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.