AMRK vs RGLD vs WPM vs FNV

For growth investors, Wheaton Precious Metals Corp.

(WPM) is the stronger pick with 83. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 13. 2% for A-Mark Precious Metals, Inc. (AMRK). Royal Gold, Inc. (RGLD) offers the better valuation at 34. 8x trailing P/E (19. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate A-Mark Precious Metals, Inc. (AMRK) a "Buy" — based on 4 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Royal Gold, Inc.

(RGLD) is the cheapest at 34. 8x versus A-Mark Precious Metals, Inc. at 65. 8x. On forward P/E, A-Mark Precious Metals, Inc. is actually cheaper at 19. 5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Franco-Nevada Corporation wins at 0. 99x versus Royal Gold, Inc. 's 2. 51x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

Over the past 5 years, Wheaton Precious Metals Corp.

(WPM) delivered a total return of +207. 9%, compared to +58. 9% for Franco-Nevada Corporation (FNV). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: WPM returned +649. 6% versus FNV's +256. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Franco-Nevada Corporation (FNV) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

56β versus A-Mark Precious Metals, Inc. 's 1. 07β — meaning AMRK is approximately 91% more volatile than FNV relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 129% for A-Mark Precious Metals, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Wheaton Precious Metals Corp.

(WPM) is pulling ahead at 83. 3% versus 13. 2% for A-Mark Precious Metals, Inc. (AMRK). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. grew EPS 181. 2% year-over-year, compared to -75. 0% for A-Mark Precious Metals, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, WPM leads at 30. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Wheaton Precious Metals Corp.

(WPM) is the more profitable company, earning 63. 6% net margin versus 0. 2% for A-Mark Precious Metals, Inc. — meaning it keeps 63. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FNV leads at 71. 0% versus 0. 4% for AMRK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FNV leads at 73. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Franco-Nevada Corporation (FNV) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 99x versus Royal Gold, Inc. 's 2. 51x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, A-Mark Precious Metals, Inc. (AMRK) trades at 19. 5x forward P/E versus 26. 4x for Franco-Nevada Corporation — 6. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for RGLD: 31. 0% to $304. 80.

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

A-Mark Precious Metals, Inc. (AMRK) offers the highest yield at 1. 6%, versus 0. 5% for Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM).

For long-horizon retirement investors, Wheaton Precious Metals Corp.

(WPM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 63), 0. 5% yield, +649. 6% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (WPM: +649. 6%, AMRK: +397. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

These companies operate in different sectors (AMRK (Financial Services) and RGLD (Basic Materials) and WPM (Basic Materials) and FNV (Basic Materials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: AMRK is a small-cap quality compounder stock; RGLD is a mid-cap high-growth stock; WPM is a mid-cap high-growth stock; FNV is a mid-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.