Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
AMRN vs ELAN vs ACAD vs SUPN vs HRMY
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic
Biotechnology
Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic
Biotechnology
AMRN vs ELAN vs ACAD vs SUPN vs HRMY — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic | Biotechnology | Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $309M | $11.99B | $3.86B | $3.01B | $1.82B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $215M | $4.89B | $1.10B | $777M | $899M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-34M | $-242M | $376M | $-29M | $146M |
| Gross Margin | 52.5% | 49.4% | 91.5% | 89.4% | 76.5% |
| Operating Margin | -17.4% | 9.0% | 7.4% | -5.5% | 21.1% |
| Forward P/E | — | 23.3x | 50.9x | 24.1x | 9.0x |
| Total Debt | $12M | $4.02B | $52M | $41M | $240M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $135M | $545M | $178M | $128M | $753M |
AMRN vs ELAN vs ACAD vs SUPN vs HRMY — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Aug 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Amarin Corporation … (AMRN) | 100 | 9.7 | -90.3% |
| Elanco Animal Healt… (ELAN) | 100 | 81.4 | -18.6% |
| ACADIA Pharmaceutic… (ACAD) | 100 | 56.7 | -43.3% |
| Supernus Pharmaceut… (SUPN) | 100 | 234.3 | +134.3% |
| Harmony Biosciences… (HRMY) | 100 | 87.5 | -12.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: AMRN vs ELAN vs ACAD vs SUPN vs HRMY
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Among these 5 stocks, AMRN doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
ELAN ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.
- +99.9% vs HRMY's -6.0%
ACAD has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in growth exposure.
- Rev growth 11.9%, EPS growth 68.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 27.5%
- 34.3% margin vs AMRN's -15.6%
- 26.2% ROA vs AMRN's -5.1%, ROIC 10.0% vs -2.9%
SUPN is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and long-term compounding.
- beta 0.78
- 228.4% 10Y total return vs HRMY's -15.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.78, Low D/E 3.9%, current ratio 1.90x
- Beta 0.78 vs ELAN's 1.42, lower leverage
HRMY is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if defensive is your priority.
- Beta 0.79, current ratio 3.60x
- 21.5% revenue growth vs AMRN's -6.5%
- Lower P/E (9.0x vs 24.1x)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 21.5% revenue growth vs AMRN's -6.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.0x vs 24.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 34.3% margin vs AMRN's -15.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.78 vs ELAN's 1.42, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +99.9% vs HRMY's -6.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 26.2% ROA vs AMRN's -5.1%, ROIC 10.0% vs -2.9% |
AMRN vs ELAN vs ACAD vs SUPN vs HRMY — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
AMRN vs ELAN vs ACAD vs SUPN vs HRMY — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
HRMY leads in 2 of 6 categories
ELAN leads 1 • SUPN leads 1 • AMRN leads 0 • ACAD leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — ACAD and SUPN and HRMY each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ELAN is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.9B annually — 22.8x AMRN's $215M. ACAD is the more profitable business, keeping 34.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to AMRN's -15.6%. On growth, SUPN holds the edge at +38.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $215M | $4.9B | $1.1B | $777M | $899M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$34M | $957M | $96M | $29M | $209M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$34M | -$242M | $376M | -$29M | $146M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $26M | $315M | $212M | $82M | $342M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +52.5% | +49.4% | +91.5% | +89.4% | +76.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -17.4% | +9.0% | +7.4% | -5.5% | +21.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -15.6% | -4.9% | +34.3% | -3.7% | +16.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +11.9% | +6.4% | +19.4% | +10.6% | +38.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +3.1% | +14.9% | +9.7% | +38.6% | +16.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +32.9% | -15.4% | -81.8% | +81.0% | -29.5% |
Valuation Metrics
HRMY leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 9.9x trailing earnings, ACAD trades at a 15% valuation discount to HRMY's 11.6x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, HRMY's 5.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than SUPN's 53.4x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $309M | $12.0B | $3.9B | $3.0B | $1.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $186M | $15.5B | $3.7B | $2.9B | $1.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -8.24x | -51.07x | 9.85x | -76.88x | 11.59x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 23.29x | 50.91x | 24.12x | 8.95x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 16.59x | 26.91x | 53.44x | 5.58x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.44x | 2.54x | 3.61x | 4.19x | 2.09x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.67x | 1.82x | 3.15x | 2.78x | 2.11x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 45.77x | 42.21x | 36.74x | 65.45x | 5.23x |
Profitability & Efficiency
HRMY leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ACAD delivers a 35.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $36 in annual profit, vs $-7 for AMRN. AMRN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ELAN's 0.61x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ELAN scores 6/9 vs HRMY's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -7.3% | -3.6% | +35.6% | -2.7% | +17.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -5.1% | -1.8% | +26.2% | -2.0% | +12.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -2.9% | +1.9% | +10.0% | -2.8% | +42.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -2.8% | +2.2% | +10.1% | -3.4% | +22.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 6 | 6 | 4 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.03x | 0.61x | 0.04x | 0.04x | 0.28x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$123M | $3.5B | -$126M | -$87M | -$513M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $135M | $545M | $178M | $128M | $753M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $12M | $4.0B | $52M | $41M | $240M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -5148.71x | -0.26x | — | — | 21.78x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ELAN leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SUPN five years ago would be worth $17,801 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,613 for AMRN. Over the past 12 months, ELAN leads with a +99.9% total return vs HRMY's -6.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ELAN at 36.9% vs AMRN's -17.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +8.2% | +6.6% | -13.7% | +5.7% | -15.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +45.8% | +99.9% | +52.4% | +69.0% | -6.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -44.2% | +156.5% | +4.7% | +42.1% | -12.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -83.9% | -27.0% | +7.1% | +78.0% | +13.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -54.5% | -33.3% | -22.9% | +228.4% | -15.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -17.7% | +36.9% | +1.5% | +12.4% | -4.5% |
Risk & Volatility
SUPN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SUPN is the less volatile stock with a 0.78 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ELAN's 1.42 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SUPN currently trades 87.6% from its 52-week high vs AMRN's 71.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.94x | 1.42x | 1.26x | 0.78x | 0.79x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $20.90 | $27.72 | $27.81 | $59.68 | $40.87 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $9.44 | $10.75 | $14.45 | $29.16 | $25.52 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +71.0% | +86.6% | +81.1% | +87.6% | +76.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 55.8 | 68.9 | 44.2 | 57.9 | 67.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 71K | 4.6M | 1.8M | 604K | 791K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: AMRN as "Hold", ELAN as "Buy", ACAD as "Buy", SUPN as "Buy", HRMY as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 54.1% upside for ACAD (target: $35) vs -85.4% for AMRN (target: $2).
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $2.17 | $27.88 | $34.78 | $60.00 | $46.80 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 18 | 20 | 37 | 14 | 13 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
HRMY leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). ELAN leads in 1 (Total Returns). 1 tied.
AMRN vs ELAN vs ACAD vs SUPN vs HRMY: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is AMRN or ELAN or ACAD or SUPN or HRMY a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Harmony Biosciences Holdings, Inc.
(HRMY) is the stronger pick with 21. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -6. 5% for Amarin Corporation plc (AMRN). ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc. (ACAD) offers the better valuation at 9. 9x trailing P/E (50. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Elanco Animal Health Incorporated (ELAN) a "Buy" — based on 20 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — AMRN or ELAN or ACAD or SUPN or HRMY?
On trailing P/E, ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc.
(ACAD) is the cheapest at 9. 9x versus Harmony Biosciences Holdings, Inc. at 11. 6x. On forward P/E, Harmony Biosciences Holdings, Inc. is actually cheaper at 9. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — AMRN or ELAN or ACAD or SUPN or HRMY?
Over the past 5 years, Supernus Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(SUPN) delivered a total return of +78. 0%, compared to -83. 9% for Amarin Corporation plc (AMRN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SUPN returned +228. 4% versus AMRN's -54. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — AMRN or ELAN or ACAD or SUPN or HRMY?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Supernus Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(SUPN) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 78β versus Elanco Animal Health Incorporated's 1. 42β — meaning ELAN is approximately 81% more volatile than SUPN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Amarin Corporation plc (AMRN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 61% for Elanco Animal Health Incorporated — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — AMRN or ELAN or ACAD or SUPN or HRMY?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Harmony Biosciences Holdings, Inc.
(HRMY) is pulling ahead at 21. 5% versus -6. 5% for Amarin Corporation plc (AMRN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc. grew EPS 68. 4% year-over-year, compared to -169. 1% for Elanco Animal Health Incorporated. Over a 3-year CAGR, ACAD leads at 27. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — AMRN or ELAN or ACAD or SUPN or HRMY?
ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc.
(ACAD) is the more profitable company, earning 36. 5% net margin versus -18. 2% for Amarin Corporation plc — meaning it keeps 36. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HRMY leads at 24. 0% versus -6. 5% for AMRN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ACAD leads at 91. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is AMRN or ELAN or ACAD or SUPN or HRMY more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Harmony Biosciences Holdings, Inc.
(HRMY) trades at 9. 0x forward P/E versus 50. 9x for ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc. — 42. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ACAD: 54. 1% to $34. 78.
08Which pays a better dividend — AMRN or ELAN or ACAD or SUPN or HRMY?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is AMRN or ELAN or ACAD or SUPN or HRMY better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Supernus Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(SUPN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 78), +228. 4% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (SUPN: +228. 4%, ELAN: -33. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between AMRN and ELAN and ACAD and SUPN and HRMY?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: AMRN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ELAN is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; ACAD is a small-cap deep-value stock; SUPN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; HRMY is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.