Compare Stocks

4 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

AMSC vs ITRN vs GRMN vs POWI

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
AMSC
American Superconductor Corporation

Industrial - Machinery

IndustrialsNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$2.56B
5Y Perf.+634.1%
ITRN
Ituran Location and Control Ltd.

Communication Equipment

TechnologyNASDAQ • IL
Market Cap$1.38B
5Y Perf.+244.5%
GRMN
Garmin Ltd.

Hardware, Equipment & Parts

TechnologyNYSE • CH
Market Cap$46.66B
5Y Perf.+168.3%
POWI
Power Integrations, Inc.

Semiconductors

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$4.00B
5Y Perf.+32.6%

AMSC vs ITRN vs GRMN vs POWI — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
AMSC logoAMSC
ITRN logoITRN
GRMN logoGRMN
POWI logoPOWI
IndustryIndustrial - MachineryCommunication EquipmentHardware, Equipment & PartsSemiconductors
Market Cap$2.56B$1.38B$46.66B$4.00B
Revenue (TTM)$279M$359M$7.46B$446M
Net Income (TTM)$130M$58M$1.74B$17M
Gross Margin30.6%49.7%59.1%53.9%
Operating Margin4.9%21.4%26.5%4.6%
Forward P/E15.4x17.8x25.5x55.5x
Total Debt$3M$5M$165M$0.00
Cash & Equiv.$79M$108M$2.28B$59M

AMSC vs ITRN vs GRMN vs POWILong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

AMSC
ITRN
GRMN
POWI
StockMay 20May 26Return
American Supercondu… (AMSC)100734.1+634.1%
Ituran Location and… (ITRN)100344.5+244.5%
Garmin Ltd. (GRMN)100268.3+168.3%
Power Integrations,… (POWI)100132.6+32.6%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: AMSC vs ITRN vs GRMN vs POWI

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: AMSC leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. Ituran Location and Control Ltd. is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and capital preservation and lower volatility. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
AMSC
American Superconductor Corporation
The Growth Play

AMSC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.

  • Rev growth 53.0%, EPS growth 143.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 27.1%
  • 379.0% 10Y total return vs GRMN's 5.6%
  • 53.0% revenue growth vs POWI's 5.9%
  • 46.7% margin vs POWI's 3.7%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
ITRN
Ituran Location and Control Ltd.
The Income Pick

ITRN is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and valuation efficiency is your priority.

  • Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 1.18, yield 3.2%
  • PEG 0.58 vs GRMN's 2.38
  • Beta 1.18, yield 3.2%, current ratio 2.28x
  • Lower P/E (17.8x vs 55.5x)
Best for: income & stability and valuation efficiency
GRMN
Garmin Ltd.
The Defensive Pick

GRMN is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.

  • Lower volatility, beta 1.30, Low D/E 1.8%, current ratio 3.63x
Best for: sleep-well-at-night
POWI
Power Integrations, Inc.
The Secondary Option

POWI lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: technology exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthAMSC logoAMSC53.0% revenue growth vs POWI's 5.9%
ValueITRN logoITRNLower P/E (17.8x vs 55.5x)
Quality / MarginsAMSC logoAMSC46.7% margin vs POWI's 3.7%
Stability / SafetyITRN logoITRNBeta 1.18 vs AMSC's 2.90
DividendsITRN logoITRN3.2% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs POWI's 1.2%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)AMSC logoAMSC+156.9% vs GRMN's +30.4%
Efficiency (ROA)AMSC logoAMSC18.1% ROA vs POWI's 2.1%, ROIC -0.9% vs 2.4%

AMSC vs ITRN vs GRMN vs POWI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

AMSCAmerican Superconductor Corporation
FY 2024
Grid
82.7%$170M
Wind
17.3%$36M
ITRNIturan Location and Control Ltd.
FY 2021
Telematics Services
70.0%$190M
Telematics Products
30.0%$81M
GRMNGarmin Ltd.
FY 2025
Fitness
32.5%$2.4B
Outdoor
28.3%$2.1B
Marine Segment
16.3%$1.2B
Aviation
13.6%$987M
Automotive Mobile
9.2%$665M
POWIPower Integrations, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

AMSC vs ITRN vs GRMN vs POWI — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLITRNLAGGINGPOWI

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

AMSC leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

GRMN is the larger business by revenue, generating $7.5B annually — 26.7x AMSC's $279M. AMSC is the more profitable business, keeping 46.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to POWI's 3.7%. On growth, AMSC holds the edge at +21.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricAMSC logoAMSCAmerican Supercon…ITRN logoITRNIturan Location a…GRMN logoGRMNGarmin Ltd.POWI logoPOWIPower Integration…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$279M$359M$7.5B$446M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$18M$96M$2.2B$41M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$130M$58M$1.7B$17M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$16M$71M$1.5B$85M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+30.6%+49.7%+59.1%+53.9%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+4.9%+21.4%+26.5%+4.6%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+46.7%+16.1%+23.3%+3.7%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+5.7%+19.7%+19.4%+18.9%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+21.4%+12.8%+14.2%+2.6%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+39.9%+10.0%+21.5%-60.0%
AMSC leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

ITRN leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 20.2x trailing earnings, ITRN trades at a 94% valuation discount to AMSC's 332.6x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), ITRN offers better value at 0.66x vs GRMN's 2.63x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricAMSC logoAMSCAmerican Supercon…ITRN logoITRNIturan Location a…GRMN logoGRMNGarmin Ltd.POWI logoPOWIPower Integration…
Market CapShares × price$2.6B$1.4B$46.7B$4.0B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$2.5B$1.3B$44.5B$3.9B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS332.63x20.19x28.16x184.18x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.15.37x17.84x25.45x55.51x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.66x2.63x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple454.16x13.33x21.57x79.69x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue11.47x3.85x6.44x9.02x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share10.18x5.22x5.22x6.01x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF98.78x20.72x34.23x45.93x
ITRN leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

ITRN leads this category, winning 4 of 8 comparable metrics.

ITRN delivers a 27.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $27 in annual profit, vs $2 for POWI. AMSC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.02x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ITRN's 0.02x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AMSC scores 7/9 vs POWI's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricAMSC logoAMSCAmerican Supercon…ITRN logoITRNIturan Location a…GRMN logoGRMNGarmin Ltd.POWI logoPOWIPower Integration…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+24.3%+27.3%+19.9%+2.4%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+18.1%+15.8%+16.2%+2.1%
ROICReturn on invested capital-0.9%+47.2%+22.0%+2.4%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-0.6%+29.5%+21.6%+2.9%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–97776
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.02x0.02x0.02x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$76M-$103M-$2.1B-$59M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$79M$108M$2.3B$59M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$3M$5M$165M$0
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense32.28x
ITRN leads this category, winning 4 of 8 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

AMSC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in AMSC five years ago would be worth $35,504 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $9,165 for POWI. Over the past 12 months, AMSC leads with a +156.9% total return vs GRMN's +30.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AMSC at 139.0% vs POWI's -2.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricAMSC logoAMSCAmerican Supercon…ITRN logoITRNIturan Location a…GRMN logoGRMNGarmin Ltd.POWI logoPOWIPower Integration…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+68.5%+42.2%+19.9%+93.2%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+156.9%+76.7%+30.4%+44.4%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+1264.6%+206.4%+142.8%-6.3%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+255.0%+180.2%+79.0%-8.3%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+379.0%+233.6%+563.1%+232.7%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+139.0%+45.2%+34.4%-2.2%
AMSC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

ITRN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

ITRN is the less volatile stock with a 1.18 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AMSC's 2.90 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ITRN currently trades 98.5% from its 52-week high vs AMSC's 75.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricAMSC logoAMSCAmerican Supercon…ITRN logoITRNIturan Location a…GRMN logoGRMNGarmin Ltd.POWI logoPOWIPower Integration…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5002.90x1.18x1.30x2.08x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$70.49$59.84$273.32$78.94
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$20.43$32.71$184.47$30.86
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+75.5%+98.5%+88.5%+91.0%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10074.068.344.276.1
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded1.1M118K733K967K
ITRN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — ITRN and POWI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: AMSC as "Buy", ITRN as "Hold", GRMN as "Hold", POWI as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 15.6% upside for AMSC (target: $62) vs -5.0% for ITRN (target: $56). For income investors, ITRN offers the higher dividend yield at 3.21% vs POWI's 1.17%.

MetricAMSC logoAMSCAmerican Supercon…ITRN logoITRNIturan Location a…GRMN logoGRMNGarmin Ltd.POWI logoPOWIPower Integration…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyHoldHoldBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$61.50$56.00$269.00$79.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts1552816
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+3.2%+1.4%+1.2%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises3218
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$1.89$3.43$0.84
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+0.0%+0.2%+0.5%+2.5%
Evenly matched — ITRN and POWI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

ITRN leads in 3 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). AMSC leads in 2 (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). 1 tied.

Best OverallIturan Location and Control… (ITRN)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

AMSC vs ITRN vs GRMN vs POWI: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is AMSC or ITRN or GRMN or POWI a better buy right now?

For growth investors, American Superconductor Corporation (AMSC) is the stronger pick with 53.

0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 5. 9% for Power Integrations, Inc. (POWI). Ituran Location and Control Ltd. (ITRN) offers the better valuation at 20. 2x trailing P/E (17. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate American Superconductor Corporation (AMSC) a "Buy" — based on 15 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — AMSC or ITRN or GRMN or POWI?

On trailing P/E, Ituran Location and Control Ltd.

(ITRN) is the cheapest at 20. 2x versus American Superconductor Corporation at 332. 6x. On forward P/E, American Superconductor Corporation is actually cheaper at 15. 4x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Ituran Location and Control Ltd. wins at 0. 58x versus Garmin Ltd. 's 2. 38x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — AMSC or ITRN or GRMN or POWI?

Over the past 5 years, American Superconductor Corporation (AMSC) delivered a total return of +255.

0%, compared to -8. 3% for Power Integrations, Inc. (POWI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GRMN returned +563. 1% versus POWI's +232. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — AMSC or ITRN or GRMN or POWI?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Ituran Location and Control Ltd.

(ITRN) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 18β versus American Superconductor Corporation's 2. 90β — meaning AMSC is approximately 146% more volatile than ITRN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, American Superconductor Corporation (AMSC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 2% for Ituran Location and Control Ltd. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — AMSC or ITRN or GRMN or POWI?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), American Superconductor Corporation (AMSC) is pulling ahead at 53.

0% versus 5. 9% for Power Integrations, Inc. (POWI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: American Superconductor Corporation grew EPS 143. 2% year-over-year, compared to -30. 4% for Power Integrations, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, AMSC leads at 27. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — AMSC or ITRN or GRMN or POWI?

Garmin Ltd.

(GRMN) is the more profitable company, earning 23. 0% net margin versus 2. 7% for American Superconductor Corporation — meaning it keeps 23. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: GRMN leads at 25. 9% versus -0. 5% for AMSC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — GRMN leads at 58. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is AMSC or ITRN or GRMN or POWI more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Ituran Location and Control Ltd. (ITRN) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 58x versus Garmin Ltd. 's 2. 38x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, American Superconductor Corporation (AMSC) trades at 15. 4x forward P/E versus 55. 5x for Power Integrations, Inc. — 40. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for AMSC: 15. 6% to $61. 50.

08

Which pays a better dividend — AMSC or ITRN or GRMN or POWI?

In this comparison, ITRN (3.

2% yield), GRMN (1. 4% yield), POWI (1. 2% yield) pay a dividend. AMSC does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is AMSC or ITRN or GRMN or POWI better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Garmin Ltd.

(GRMN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (1. 4% yield, +563. 1% 10Y return). American Superconductor Corporation (AMSC) carries a higher beta of 2. 90 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (GRMN: +563. 1%, AMSC: +379. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between AMSC and ITRN and GRMN and POWI?

These companies operate in different sectors (AMSC (Industrials) and ITRN (Technology) and GRMN (Technology) and POWI (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: AMSC is a small-cap high-growth stock; ITRN is a small-cap income-oriented stock; GRMN is a mid-cap high-growth stock; POWI is a small-cap quality compounder stock. ITRN, GRMN, POWI pay a dividend while AMSC does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

AMSC

High-Growth Quality Leader

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 10%
  • Net Margin > 28%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

ITRN

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 6%
  • Net Margin > 9%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

GRMN

Quality Mega-Cap Compounder

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 7%
  • Net Margin > 13%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

POWI

Stable Dividend Mega-Cap

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 32%
  • Dividend Yield > 0.5%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform AMSC and ITRN and GRMN and POWI on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(AMSC: 21.4% · ITRN: 12.8%)
Net Margin>
%
(AMSC: 46.7% · ITRN: 16.1%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(AMSC: 332.6x · ITRN: 20.2x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.