Industrial - Machinery
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
AMSC vs ITRN vs GRMN vs POWI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Communication Equipment
Hardware, Equipment & Parts
Semiconductors
AMSC vs ITRN vs GRMN vs POWI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Industrial - Machinery | Communication Equipment | Hardware, Equipment & Parts | Semiconductors |
| Market Cap | $2.56B | $1.38B | $46.66B | $4.00B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $279M | $359M | $7.46B | $446M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $130M | $58M | $1.74B | $17M |
| Gross Margin | 30.6% | 49.7% | 59.1% | 53.9% |
| Operating Margin | 4.9% | 21.4% | 26.5% | 4.6% |
| Forward P/E | 15.4x | 17.8x | 25.5x | 55.5x |
| Total Debt | $3M | $5M | $165M | $0.00 |
| Cash & Equiv. | $79M | $108M | $2.28B | $59M |
AMSC vs ITRN vs GRMN vs POWI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| American Supercondu… (AMSC) | 100 | 734.1 | +634.1% |
| Ituran Location and… (ITRN) | 100 | 344.5 | +244.5% |
| Garmin Ltd. (GRMN) | 100 | 268.3 | +168.3% |
| Power Integrations,… (POWI) | 100 | 132.6 | +32.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: AMSC vs ITRN vs GRMN vs POWI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
AMSC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 53.0%, EPS growth 143.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 27.1%
- 379.0% 10Y total return vs GRMN's 5.6%
- 53.0% revenue growth vs POWI's 5.9%
- 46.7% margin vs POWI's 3.7%
ITRN is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and valuation efficiency is your priority.
- Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 1.18, yield 3.2%
- PEG 0.58 vs GRMN's 2.38
- Beta 1.18, yield 3.2%, current ratio 2.28x
- Lower P/E (17.8x vs 55.5x)
GRMN is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.30, Low D/E 1.8%, current ratio 3.63x
POWI lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 53.0% revenue growth vs POWI's 5.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (17.8x vs 55.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 46.7% margin vs POWI's 3.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.18 vs AMSC's 2.90 | |
| Dividends | 3.2% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs POWI's 1.2%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +156.9% vs GRMN's +30.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 18.1% ROA vs POWI's 2.1%, ROIC -0.9% vs 2.4% |
AMSC vs ITRN vs GRMN vs POWI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
AMSC vs ITRN vs GRMN vs POWI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ITRN leads in 3 of 6 categories
AMSC leads 2 • GRMN leads 0 • POWI leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AMSC leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GRMN is the larger business by revenue, generating $7.5B annually — 26.7x AMSC's $279M. AMSC is the more profitable business, keeping 46.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to POWI's 3.7%. On growth, AMSC holds the edge at +21.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $279M | $359M | $7.5B | $446M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $18M | $96M | $2.2B | $41M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $130M | $58M | $1.7B | $17M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $16M | $71M | $1.5B | $85M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +30.6% | +49.7% | +59.1% | +53.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +4.9% | +21.4% | +26.5% | +4.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +46.7% | +16.1% | +23.3% | +3.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +5.7% | +19.7% | +19.4% | +18.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +21.4% | +12.8% | +14.2% | +2.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +39.9% | +10.0% | +21.5% | -60.0% |
Valuation Metrics
ITRN leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 20.2x trailing earnings, ITRN trades at a 94% valuation discount to AMSC's 332.6x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), ITRN offers better value at 0.66x vs GRMN's 2.63x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.6B | $1.4B | $46.7B | $4.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.5B | $1.3B | $44.5B | $3.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 332.63x | 20.19x | 28.16x | 184.18x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 15.37x | 17.84x | 25.45x | 55.51x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.66x | 2.63x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 454.16x | 13.33x | 21.57x | 79.69x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 11.47x | 3.85x | 6.44x | 9.02x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 10.18x | 5.22x | 5.22x | 6.01x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 98.78x | 20.72x | 34.23x | 45.93x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ITRN leads this category, winning 4 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ITRN delivers a 27.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $27 in annual profit, vs $2 for POWI. AMSC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.02x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ITRN's 0.02x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AMSC scores 7/9 vs POWI's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +24.3% | +27.3% | +19.9% | +2.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +18.1% | +15.8% | +16.2% | +2.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -0.9% | +47.2% | +22.0% | +2.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -0.6% | +29.5% | +21.6% | +2.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.02x | 0.02x | 0.02x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$76M | -$103M | -$2.1B | -$59M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $79M | $108M | $2.3B | $59M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $3M | $5M | $165M | $0 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 32.28x | — | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
AMSC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in AMSC five years ago would be worth $35,504 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $9,165 for POWI. Over the past 12 months, AMSC leads with a +156.9% total return vs GRMN's +30.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AMSC at 139.0% vs POWI's -2.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +68.5% | +42.2% | +19.9% | +93.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +156.9% | +76.7% | +30.4% | +44.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +1264.6% | +206.4% | +142.8% | -6.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +255.0% | +180.2% | +79.0% | -8.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +379.0% | +233.6% | +563.1% | +232.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +139.0% | +45.2% | +34.4% | -2.2% |
Risk & Volatility
ITRN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ITRN is the less volatile stock with a 1.18 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AMSC's 2.90 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ITRN currently trades 98.5% from its 52-week high vs AMSC's 75.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.90x | 1.18x | 1.30x | 2.08x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $70.49 | $59.84 | $273.32 | $78.94 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $20.43 | $32.71 | $184.47 | $30.86 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +75.5% | +98.5% | +88.5% | +91.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 74.0 | 68.3 | 44.2 | 76.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.1M | 118K | 733K | 967K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — ITRN and POWI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: AMSC as "Buy", ITRN as "Hold", GRMN as "Hold", POWI as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 15.6% upside for AMSC (target: $62) vs -5.0% for ITRN (target: $56). For income investors, ITRN offers the higher dividend yield at 3.21% vs POWI's 1.17%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $61.50 | $56.00 | $269.00 | $79.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 15 | 5 | 28 | 16 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +3.2% | +1.4% | +1.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 3 | 2 | 18 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $1.89 | $3.43 | $0.84 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.0% | +0.2% | +0.5% | +2.5% |
ITRN leads in 3 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). AMSC leads in 2 (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). 1 tied.
AMSC vs ITRN vs GRMN vs POWI: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is AMSC or ITRN or GRMN or POWI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, American Superconductor Corporation (AMSC) is the stronger pick with 53.
0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 5. 9% for Power Integrations, Inc. (POWI). Ituran Location and Control Ltd. (ITRN) offers the better valuation at 20. 2x trailing P/E (17. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate American Superconductor Corporation (AMSC) a "Buy" — based on 15 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — AMSC or ITRN or GRMN or POWI?
On trailing P/E, Ituran Location and Control Ltd.
(ITRN) is the cheapest at 20. 2x versus American Superconductor Corporation at 332. 6x. On forward P/E, American Superconductor Corporation is actually cheaper at 15. 4x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Ituran Location and Control Ltd. wins at 0. 58x versus Garmin Ltd. 's 2. 38x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — AMSC or ITRN or GRMN or POWI?
Over the past 5 years, American Superconductor Corporation (AMSC) delivered a total return of +255.
0%, compared to -8. 3% for Power Integrations, Inc. (POWI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GRMN returned +563. 1% versus POWI's +232. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — AMSC or ITRN or GRMN or POWI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Ituran Location and Control Ltd.
(ITRN) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 18β versus American Superconductor Corporation's 2. 90β — meaning AMSC is approximately 146% more volatile than ITRN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, American Superconductor Corporation (AMSC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 2% for Ituran Location and Control Ltd. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — AMSC or ITRN or GRMN or POWI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), American Superconductor Corporation (AMSC) is pulling ahead at 53.
0% versus 5. 9% for Power Integrations, Inc. (POWI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: American Superconductor Corporation grew EPS 143. 2% year-over-year, compared to -30. 4% for Power Integrations, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, AMSC leads at 27. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — AMSC or ITRN or GRMN or POWI?
Garmin Ltd.
(GRMN) is the more profitable company, earning 23. 0% net margin versus 2. 7% for American Superconductor Corporation — meaning it keeps 23. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: GRMN leads at 25. 9% versus -0. 5% for AMSC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — GRMN leads at 58. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is AMSC or ITRN or GRMN or POWI more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Ituran Location and Control Ltd. (ITRN) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 58x versus Garmin Ltd. 's 2. 38x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, American Superconductor Corporation (AMSC) trades at 15. 4x forward P/E versus 55. 5x for Power Integrations, Inc. — 40. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for AMSC: 15. 6% to $61. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — AMSC or ITRN or GRMN or POWI?
In this comparison, ITRN (3.
2% yield), GRMN (1. 4% yield), POWI (1. 2% yield) pay a dividend. AMSC does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is AMSC or ITRN or GRMN or POWI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Garmin Ltd.
(GRMN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (1. 4% yield, +563. 1% 10Y return). American Superconductor Corporation (AMSC) carries a higher beta of 2. 90 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (GRMN: +563. 1%, AMSC: +379. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between AMSC and ITRN and GRMN and POWI?
These companies operate in different sectors (AMSC (Industrials) and ITRN (Technology) and GRMN (Technology) and POWI (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: AMSC is a small-cap high-growth stock; ITRN is a small-cap income-oriented stock; GRMN is a mid-cap high-growth stock; POWI is a small-cap quality compounder stock. ITRN, GRMN, POWI pay a dividend while AMSC does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.