Banks - Regional
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
AMTB vs OCFC vs JPM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Diversified
AMTB vs OCFC vs JPM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Diversified |
| Market Cap | $991M | $1.03B | $908.57B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $521M | $660M | $280.33B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $58M | $71M | $57.05B |
| Gross Margin | 55.6% | 54.8% | 60.0% |
| Operating Margin | 9.7% | 14.0% | 25.9% |
| Forward P/E | 13.1x | 9.5x | 14.6x |
| Total Debt | $1.04B | $1.63B | $942.38B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $470M | $135M | $343.34B |
AMTB vs OCFC vs JPM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Amerant Bancorp Inc. (AMTB) | 100 | 156.9 | +56.9% |
| OceanFirst Financia… (OCFC) | 100 | 102.3 | +2.3% |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) | 100 | 345.8 | +245.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: AMTB vs OCFC vs JPM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
AMTB is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and bank quality.
- Rev growth 14.0%, EPS growth 386.4%
- NIM 3.7% vs JPM's 2.2%
- 14.0% NII/revenue growth vs OCFC's -4.7%
OCFC has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.83, yield 4.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.83, Low D/E 98.3%, current ratio 0.13x
- Beta 0.83, yield 4.7%, current ratio 0.13x
JPM is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and valuation efficiency.
- 481.2% 10Y total return vs AMTB's 40.4%
- PEG 0.83 vs OCFC's 3.41
- Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs AMTB's 0.5% (lower = leaner)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 14.0% NII/revenue growth vs OCFC's -4.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.5x vs 13.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs AMTB's 0.5% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.83 vs AMTB's 0.93, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 4.7% yield, vs JPM's 1.8% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +44.5% vs OCFC's +12.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs AMTB's 0.5% |
AMTB vs OCFC vs JPM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
AMTB vs OCFC vs JPM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 3 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JPM leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JPM is the larger business by revenue, generating $280.3B annually — 538.5x AMTB's $521M. JPM is the more profitable business, keeping 20.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to OCFC's 10.7%.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $521M | $660M | $280.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $54M | $103M | $81.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $58M | $71M | $57.0B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $111M | $80M | $100.9B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +55.6% | +54.8% | +60.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +9.7% | +14.0% | +25.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +11.2% | +10.7% | +20.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +21.4% | +12.0% | +36.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +57.1% | -36.1% | +16.0% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — OCFC and JPM each lead in 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 15.4x trailing earnings, OCFC trades at a 18% valuation discount to AMTB's 18.7x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), JPM offers better value at 0.92x vs OCFC's 5.54x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $991M | $1.0B | $908.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.6B | $2.5B | $1.51T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 18.73x | 15.41x | 16.22x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 13.13x | 9.48x | 14.60x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 5.54x | 0.92x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 22.07x | 27.17x | 18.52x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.51x | 1.58x | 3.25x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.03x | 0.62x | 2.51x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 10.12x | 13.02x | 9.01x |
Profitability & Efficiency
JPM leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
JPM delivers a 15.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $16 in annual profit, vs $4 for OCFC. OCFC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.98x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JPM's 2.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AMTB scores 7/9 vs JPM's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +6.3% | +4.3% | +15.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.7% | +0.5% | +1.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +2.6% | +2.2% | +4.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.2% | +2.7% | +8.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.11x | 0.98x | 2.60x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $571M | $1.5B | $599.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $470M | $135M | $343.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.0B | $1.6B | $942.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.29x | 0.33x | 0.74x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
JPM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in JPM five years ago would be worth $23,548 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $10,761 for OCFC. Over the past 12 months, AMTB leads with a +44.5% total return vs OCFC's +12.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors JPM at 33.7% vs OCFC's 8.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +20.6% | +3.3% | +0.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +44.5% | +12.3% | +20.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +28.9% | +26.0% | +138.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +22.7% | +7.6% | +135.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +40.4% | +34.3% | +481.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +8.8% | +8.0% | +33.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — AMTB and OCFC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
OCFC is the less volatile stock with a 0.83 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AMTB's 0.93 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AMTB currently trades 96.8% from its 52-week high vs OCFC's 87.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.93x | 0.83x | 0.87x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $24.38 | $20.61 | $338.09 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $15.62 | $16.09 | $269.72 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +96.8% | +87.5% | +96.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 53.4 | 45.5 | 72.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 226K | 804K | 7.4M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — OCFC and JPM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: AMTB as "Hold", OCFC as "Hold", JPM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 5.4% upside for OCFC (target: $19) vs 1.7% for AMTB (target: $24). For income investors, OCFC offers the higher dividend yield at 4.66% vs AMTB's 1.18%.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $24.00 | $19.00 | $339.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 7 | 8 | 61 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.2% | +4.7% | +1.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 | 15 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.28 | $0.84 | $5.95 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +2.0% | +7.9% | +3.8% |
JPM leads in 3 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Profitability & Efficiency. 3 categories are tied.
AMTB vs OCFC vs JPM: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is AMTB or OCFC or JPM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Amerant Bancorp Inc.
(AMTB) is the stronger pick with 14. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -4. 7% for OceanFirst Financial Corp. (OCFC). OceanFirst Financial Corp. (OCFC) offers the better valuation at 15. 4x trailing P/E (9. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) a "Buy" — based on 61 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — AMTB or OCFC or JPM?
On trailing P/E, OceanFirst Financial Corp.
(OCFC) is the cheapest at 15. 4x versus Amerant Bancorp Inc. at 18. 7x. On forward P/E, OceanFirst Financial Corp. is actually cheaper at 9. 5x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: JPMorgan Chase & Co. wins at 0. 83x versus OceanFirst Financial Corp. 's 3. 41x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — AMTB or OCFC or JPM?
Over the past 5 years, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) delivered a total return of +135. 5%, compared to +7. 6% for OceanFirst Financial Corp. (OCFC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: JPM returned +481. 2% versus OCFC's +34. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — AMTB or OCFC or JPM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), OceanFirst Financial Corp.
(OCFC) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 83β versus Amerant Bancorp Inc. 's 0. 93β — meaning AMTB is approximately 12% more volatile than OCFC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, OceanFirst Financial Corp. (OCFC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 98% versus 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — AMTB or OCFC or JPM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Amerant Bancorp Inc.
(AMTB) is pulling ahead at 14. 0% versus -4. 7% for OceanFirst Financial Corp. (OCFC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Amerant Bancorp Inc. grew EPS 386. 4% year-over-year, compared to -29. 1% for OceanFirst Financial Corp.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — AMTB or OCFC or JPM?
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) is the more profitable company, earning 20. 4% net margin versus 8. 0% for Amerant Bancorp Inc. — meaning it keeps 20. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: JPM leads at 26. 0% versus 10. 1% for AMTB. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — JPM leads at 59. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is AMTB or OCFC or JPM more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 83x versus OceanFirst Financial Corp. 's 3. 41x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, OceanFirst Financial Corp. (OCFC) trades at 9. 5x forward P/E versus 14. 6x for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — 5. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for OCFC: 5. 4% to $19. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — AMTB or OCFC or JPM?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
OceanFirst Financial Corp. (OCFC) offers the highest yield at 4. 7%, versus 1. 2% for Amerant Bancorp Inc. (AMTB).
09Is AMTB or OCFC or JPM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 87), 1. 8% yield, +481. 2% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (JPM: +481. 2%, AMTB: +40. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between AMTB and OCFC and JPM?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: AMTB is a small-cap quality compounder stock; OCFC is a small-cap deep-value stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.