Build Your Comparison

Side-by-side financial analysis
AMTB logo
AMTB
SFNC logo
SFNC
Try popular comparisons:

Stock Comparison

AMTB vs SFNC

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
AMTB
Amerant Bancorp Inc.

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$991M
5Y Perf.+56.9%
SFNC
Simmons First National Corporation

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$3.18B
5Y Perf.+28.0%

AMTB vs SFNC — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
AMTB logoAMTB
SFNC logoSFNC
IndustryBanks - RegionalBanks - Regional
Market Cap$991M$3.18B
Revenue (TTM)$521M$618M
Net Income (TTM)$58M$-398M
Gross Margin55.6%4.5%
Operating Margin9.7%-85.4%
Forward P/E13.1x10.6x
Total Debt$1.04B$641M
Cash & Equiv.$470M$380M

AMTB vs SFNCLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

AMTB
SFNC
StockJun 20Jun 26Return
Amerant Bancorp Inc. (AMTB)100156.9+56.9%
Simmons First Natio… (SFNC)100128.0+28.0%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: AMTB vs SFNC

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: AMTB leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. Simmons First National Corporation is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and capital preservation and lower volatility. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
🥇AMTB emerged as the overall leader. Track its performance:
AMTB
Amerant Bancorp Inc.
The Banking Pick

AMTB carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.

  • Rev growth 14.0%, EPS growth 386.4%
  • 40.4% 10Y total return vs SFNC's 25.0%
  • NIM 3.7% vs SFNC's 2.9%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
SFNC
Simmons First National Corporation
The Banking Pick

SFNC is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.

  • Dividend streak 14 yrs, beta 0.84, yield 3.9%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.84, Low D/E 18.8%, current ratio 0.86x
  • Beta 0.84, yield 3.9%, current ratio 0.86x
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthAMTB logoAMTB14.0% NII/revenue growth vs SFNC's -56.7%
ValueSFNC logoSFNCLower P/E (10.6x vs 13.1x)
Quality / MarginsAMTB logoAMTBEfficiency ratio 0.5% vs SFNC's 0.9% (lower = leaner)
Stability / SafetySFNC logoSFNCBeta 0.84 vs AMTB's 0.93, lower leverage
DividendsSFNC logoSFNC3.9% yield, 14-year raise streak, vs AMTB's 1.2%
Momentum (1Y)AMTB logoAMTB+44.5% vs SFNC's +25.0%
Efficiency (ROA)AMTB logoAMTBEfficiency ratio 0.5% vs SFNC's 0.9%

AMTB vs SFNC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

AMTBAmerant Bancorp Inc.
FY 2018
Corporate LATAM
100.0%$1.0B
SFNCSimmons First National Corporation
FY 2025
Deposit Account
36.8%$51M
Fiduciary and Trust
28.5%$39M
Credit and Debit Card
24.7%$34M
Mortgage Loans
5.9%$8M
Financial Service, Other
4.1%$6M

AMTB vs SFNC — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLAMTBLAGGINGSFNC

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

AMTB leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.

SFNC and AMTB operate at a comparable scale, with $618M and $521M in trailing revenue. AMTB is the more profitable business, keeping 11.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SFNC's -64.3%.

MetricAMTB logoAMTBAmerant Bancorp I…SFNC logoSFNCSimmons First Nat…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$521M$618M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$54M-$444M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$58M-$398M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$111M$410M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+55.6%+4.5%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+9.7%-85.4%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+11.2%-64.3%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+21.4%+66.4%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+57.1%+42.1%
AMTB leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

SFNC leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
MetricAMTB logoAMTBAmerant Bancorp I…SFNC logoSFNCSimmons First Nat…
Market CapShares × price$991M$3.2B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$1.6B$3.4B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS18.73x-7.42x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.13.13x10.61x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple22.07x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue1.51x5.07x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.03x0.86x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF10.12x7.52x
SFNC leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

AMTB leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

AMTB delivers a 6.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $6 in annual profit, vs $-11 for SFNC. SFNC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.19x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to AMTB's 1.11x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AMTB scores 7/9 vs SFNC's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricAMTB logoAMTBAmerant Bancorp I…SFNC logoSFNCSimmons First Nat…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+6.3%-11.5%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+0.7%-1.6%
ROICReturn on invested capital+2.6%-9.1%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+2.2%-4.2%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–974
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage1.11x0.19x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$571M$261M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$470M$380M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$1.0B$641M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense0.29x-1.01x
AMTB leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

AMTB leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in AMTB five years ago would be worth $12,272 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $9,147 for SFNC. Over the past 12 months, AMTB leads with a +44.5% total return vs SFNC's +25.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SFNC at 10.5% vs AMTB's 8.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricAMTB logoAMTBAmerant Bancorp I…SFNC logoSFNCSimmons First Nat…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+20.6%+18.7%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+44.5%+25.0%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+28.9%+34.8%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+22.7%-8.5%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+40.4%+25.0%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+8.8%+10.5%
AMTB leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

SFNC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

SFNC is the less volatile stock with a 0.84 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AMTB's 0.93 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.

MetricAMTB logoAMTBAmerant Bancorp I…SFNC logoSFNCSimmons First Nat…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.93x0.84x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$24.38$22.62
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$15.62$17.00
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+96.8%+96.8%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10053.452.8
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded226K1.1M
SFNC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

SFNC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Wall Street rates AMTB as "Hold" and SFNC as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 5.0% upside for SFNC (target: $23) vs 1.7% for AMTB (target: $24). For income investors, SFNC offers the higher dividend yield at 3.90% vs AMTB's 1.18%.

MetricAMTB logoAMTBAmerant Bancorp I…SFNC logoSFNCSimmons First Nat…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$24.00$23.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts79
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+1.2%+3.9%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises014
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.28$0.85
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+2.0%0.0%
SFNC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

AMTB leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). SFNC leads in 3 (Valuation Metrics, Risk & Volatility).

Best OverallAmerant Bancorp Inc. (AMTB)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

AMTB vs SFNC: Frequently Asked Questions

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is AMTB or SFNC a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Amerant Bancorp Inc.

(AMTB) is the stronger pick with 14. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -56. 7% for Simmons First National Corporation (SFNC). Amerant Bancorp Inc. (AMTB) offers the better valuation at 18. 7x trailing P/E (13. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Simmons First National Corporation (SFNC) a "Buy" — based on 9 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — AMTB or SFNC?

On forward P/E, Simmons First National Corporation is actually cheaper at 10.

6x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — AMTB or SFNC?

Over the past 5 years, Amerant Bancorp Inc.

(AMTB) delivered a total return of +22. 7%, compared to -8. 5% for Simmons First National Corporation (SFNC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AMTB returned +40. 4% versus SFNC's +25. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — AMTB or SFNC?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Simmons First National Corporation (SFNC) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

84β versus Amerant Bancorp Inc. 's 0. 93β — meaning AMTB is approximately 11% more volatile than SFNC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Simmons First National Corporation (SFNC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 19% versus 111% for Amerant Bancorp Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — AMTB or SFNC?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Amerant Bancorp Inc.

(AMTB) is pulling ahead at 14. 0% versus -56. 7% for Simmons First National Corporation (SFNC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Amerant Bancorp Inc. grew EPS 386. 4% year-over-year, compared to -343. 8% for Simmons First National Corporation. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — AMTB or SFNC?

Amerant Bancorp Inc.

(AMTB) is the more profitable company, earning 8. 0% net margin versus -63. 4% for Simmons First National Corporation — meaning it keeps 8. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AMTB leads at 10. 1% versus -84. 2% for SFNC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AMTB leads at 57. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is AMTB or SFNC more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Simmons First National Corporation (SFNC) trades at 10.

6x forward P/E versus 13. 1x for Amerant Bancorp Inc. — 2. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SFNC: 5. 0% to $23. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — AMTB or SFNC?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Simmons First National Corporation (SFNC) offers the highest yield at 3. 9%, versus 1. 2% for Amerant Bancorp Inc. (AMTB).

09

Is AMTB or SFNC better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Simmons First National Corporation (SFNC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

84), 3. 9% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (SFNC: +25. 0%, AMTB: +40. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between AMTB and SFNC?

Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: AMTB is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SFNC is a small-cap income-oriented stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.