Banks - Regional
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
AMTB vs SFNC vs KO vs JPM vs V
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Beverages - Non-Alcoholic
Banks - Diversified
Financial - Credit Services
AMTB vs SFNC vs KO vs JPM vs V — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Beverages - Non-Alcoholic | Banks - Diversified | Financial - Credit Services |
| Market Cap | $991M | $3.18B | $341.71B | $908.57B | $627.79B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $521M | $618M | $49.28B | $280.33B | $43.03B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $58M | $-398M | $13.70B | $57.05B | $22.24B |
| Gross Margin | 55.6% | 4.5% | 61.7% | 60.0% | 81.3% |
| Operating Margin | 9.7% | -85.4% | 29.3% | 25.9% | 61.1% |
| Forward P/E | 13.1x | 10.6x | 24.3x | 14.6x | 24.9x |
| Total Debt | $1.04B | $641M | $45.49B | $942.38B | $25.17B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $470M | $380M | $10.27B | $343.34B | $20.15B |
AMTB vs SFNC vs KO vs JPM vs V — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Amerant Bancorp Inc. (AMTB) | 100 | 156.9 | +56.9% |
| Simmons First Natio… (SFNC) | 100 | 128.0 | +28.0% |
| The Coca-Cola Compa… (KO) | 100 | 177.7 | +77.7% |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) | 100 | 345.8 | +245.8% |
| Visa Inc. (V) | 100 | 169.4 | +69.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: AMTB vs SFNC vs KO vs JPM vs V
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
AMTB is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and bank quality is your priority.
- Rev growth 14.0%, EPS growth 386.4%
- NIM 3.7% vs JPM's 2.2%
- 14.0% NII/revenue growth vs SFNC's -56.7%
- +44.5% vs V's -3.1%
SFNC ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 14 yrs, beta 0.84, yield 3.9%
- Beta 0.84, yield 3.9%, current ratio 0.86x
- Lower P/E (10.6x vs 24.9x)
- 3.9% yield, 14-year raise streak, vs KO's 2.6%
KO lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
JPM is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and valuation efficiency.
- 481.2% 10Y total return vs V's 342.3%
- PEG 0.83 vs KO's 2.17
V carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.48, Low D/E 66.4%, current ratio 1.08x
- 51.7% margin vs SFNC's -64.3%
- Beta 0.48 vs AMTB's 0.93, lower leverage
- 22.7% ROA vs SFNC's -1.6%, ROIC 29.2% vs -9.1%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 14.0% NII/revenue growth vs SFNC's -56.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (10.6x vs 24.9x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 51.7% margin vs SFNC's -64.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.48 vs AMTB's 0.93, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 3.9% yield, 14-year raise streak, vs KO's 2.6% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +44.5% vs V's -3.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 22.7% ROA vs SFNC's -1.6%, ROIC 29.2% vs -9.1% |
AMTB vs SFNC vs KO vs JPM vs V — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
AMTB vs SFNC vs KO vs JPM vs V — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
V leads in 2 of 6 categories
SFNC leads 1 • JPM leads 1 • AMTB leads 0 • KO leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
V leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JPM is the larger business by revenue, generating $280.3B annually — 538.5x AMTB's $521M. V is the more profitable business, keeping 51.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SFNC's -64.3%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $521M | $618M | $49.3B | $280.3B | $43.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $54M | -$444M | $15.5B | $81.4B | $27.6B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $58M | -$398M | $13.7B | $57.0B | $22.2B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $111M | $410M | $12.6B | $100.9B | $21.2B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +55.6% | +4.5% | +61.7% | +60.0% | +81.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +9.7% | -85.4% | +29.3% | +25.9% | +61.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +11.2% | -64.3% | +27.8% | +20.4% | +51.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +21.4% | +66.4% | +25.5% | +36.0% | +49.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | +12.1% | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +57.1% | +42.1% | +18.2% | +16.0% | +35.3% |
Valuation Metrics
SFNC leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 16.2x trailing earnings, JPM trades at a 49% valuation discount to V's 32.1x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), JPM offers better value at 0.92x vs KO's 2.34x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $991M | $3.2B | $341.7B | $908.6B | $627.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.6B | $3.4B | $376.9B | $1.51T | $632.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 18.73x | -7.42x | 26.12x | 16.22x | 32.08x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 13.13x | 10.61x | 24.27x | 14.60x | 24.88x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 2.34x | 0.92x | 2.03x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 22.07x | — | 25.45x | 18.52x | 25.10x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.51x | 5.07x | 7.13x | 3.25x | 15.69x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.03x | 0.86x | 9.99x | 2.51x | 16.97x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 10.12x | 7.52x | 64.52x | 9.01x | 29.10x |
Profitability & Efficiency
V leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
V delivers a 58.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $59 in annual profit, vs $-11 for SFNC. SFNC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.19x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JPM's 2.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AMTB scores 7/9 vs SFNC's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +6.3% | -11.5% | +41.1% | +15.9% | +58.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.7% | -1.6% | +13.1% | +1.3% | +22.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +2.6% | -9.1% | +15.8% | +4.5% | +29.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.2% | -4.2% | +17.3% | +8.9% | +36.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 4 | 7 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.11x | 0.19x | 1.33x | 2.60x | 0.66x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $571M | $261M | $35.2B | $599.0B | $5.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $470M | $380M | $10.3B | $343.3B | $20.2B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.0B | $641M | $45.5B | $942.4B | $25.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.29x | -1.01x | 10.70x | 0.74x | 26.72x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
JPM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in JPM five years ago would be worth $23,548 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $9,147 for SFNC. Over the past 12 months, AMTB leads with a +44.5% total return vs V's -3.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors JPM at 33.7% vs AMTB's 8.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +20.6% | +18.7% | +16.4% | +0.8% | -5.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +44.5% | +25.0% | +17.7% | +20.9% | -3.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +28.9% | +34.8% | +39.3% | +138.8% | +47.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +22.7% | -8.5% | +65.3% | +135.5% | +46.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +40.4% | +25.0% | +115.0% | +481.2% | +342.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +8.8% | +10.5% | +11.7% | +33.7% | +13.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — SFNC and KO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KO is the less volatile stock with a -0.23 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AMTB's 0.93 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SFNC currently trades 96.8% from its 52-week high vs V's 91.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.93x | 0.84x | -0.24x | 0.87x | 0.48x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $24.38 | $22.62 | $84.04 | $338.09 | $359.66 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $15.62 | $17.00 | $65.35 | $269.72 | $293.89 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +96.8% | +96.8% | +94.5% | +96.2% | +91.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 53.4 | 52.8 | 49.2 | 72.1 | 57.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 226K | 1.1M | 13.6M | 7.4M | 6.7M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — SFNC and KO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: AMTB as "Hold", SFNC as "Buy", KO as "Buy", JPM as "Buy", V as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 12.7% upside for V (target: $369) vs 1.7% for AMTB (target: $24). For income investors, SFNC offers the higher dividend yield at 3.90% vs V's 0.72%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $24.00 | $23.00 | $86.13 | $339.75 | $368.91 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 7 | 9 | 48 | 61 | 61 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.2% | +3.9% | +2.6% | +1.8% | +0.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 14 | 56 | 15 | 18 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.28 | $0.85 | $2.04 | $5.95 | $2.36 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +2.0% | 0.0% | +0.2% | +3.8% | +2.1% |
V leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). SFNC leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
AMTB vs SFNC vs KO vs JPM vs V: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is AMTB or SFNC or KO or JPM or V a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Amerant Bancorp Inc.
(AMTB) is the stronger pick with 14. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -56. 7% for Simmons First National Corporation (SFNC). JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) offers the better valuation at 16. 2x trailing P/E (14. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Simmons First National Corporation (SFNC) a "Buy" — based on 9 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — AMTB or SFNC or KO or JPM or V?
On trailing P/E, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) is the cheapest at 16. 2x versus Visa Inc. at 32. 1x. On forward P/E, Simmons First National Corporation is actually cheaper at 10. 6x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: JPMorgan Chase & Co. wins at 0. 83x versus The Coca-Cola Company's 2. 17x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — AMTB or SFNC or KO or JPM or V?
Over the past 5 years, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) delivered a total return of +135. 5%, compared to -8. 5% for Simmons First National Corporation (SFNC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: JPM returned +481. 2% versus SFNC's +25. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — AMTB or SFNC or KO or JPM or V?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
24β versus Amerant Bancorp Inc. 's 0. 93β — meaning AMTB is approximately -494% more volatile than KO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Simmons First National Corporation (SFNC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 19% versus 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — AMTB or SFNC or KO or JPM or V?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Amerant Bancorp Inc.
(AMTB) is pulling ahead at 14. 0% versus -56. 7% for Simmons First National Corporation (SFNC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Amerant Bancorp Inc. grew EPS 386. 4% year-over-year, compared to -343. 8% for Simmons First National Corporation. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — AMTB or SFNC or KO or JPM or V?
Visa Inc.
(V) is the more profitable company, earning 50. 1% net margin versus -63. 4% for Simmons First National Corporation — meaning it keeps 50. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: V leads at 60. 0% versus -84. 2% for SFNC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — V leads at 80. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is AMTB or SFNC or KO or JPM or V more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 83x versus The Coca-Cola Company's 2. 17x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Simmons First National Corporation (SFNC) trades at 10. 6x forward P/E versus 24. 9x for Visa Inc. — 14. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for V: 12. 7% to $368. 91.
08Which pays a better dividend — AMTB or SFNC or KO or JPM or V?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Simmons First National Corporation (SFNC) offers the highest yield at 3. 9%, versus 0. 7% for Visa Inc. (V).
09Is AMTB or SFNC or KO or JPM or V better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
24), 2. 6% yield, +115. 0% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (KO: +115. 0%, AMTB: +40. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between AMTB and SFNC and KO and JPM and V?
These companies operate in different sectors (AMTB (Financial Services) and SFNC (Financial Services) and KO (Consumer Defensive) and JPM (Financial Services) and V (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: AMTB is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SFNC is a small-cap income-oriented stock; KO is a large-cap quality compounder stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock; V is a large-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.