Banks - Regional
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
AMTB vs V vs JPM vs KO vs MA
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Financial - Credit Services
Banks - Diversified
Beverages - Non-Alcoholic
Financial - Credit Services
AMTB vs V vs JPM vs KO vs MA — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Financial - Credit Services | Banks - Diversified | Beverages - Non-Alcoholic | Financial - Credit Services |
| Market Cap | $991M | $627.79B | $908.57B | $341.71B | $433.57B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $521M | $43.03B | $280.33B | $49.28B | $33.94B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $58M | $22.24B | $57.05B | $13.70B | $15.57B |
| Gross Margin | 55.6% | 81.3% | 60.0% | 61.7% | 83.0% |
| Operating Margin | 9.7% | 61.1% | 25.9% | 29.3% | 59.4% |
| Forward P/E | 13.1x | 24.9x | 14.6x | 24.3x | 24.9x |
| Total Debt | $1.04B | $25.17B | $942.38B | $45.49B | $19.00B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $470M | $20.15B | $343.34B | $10.27B | $10.57B |
AMTB vs V vs JPM vs KO vs MA — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Amerant Bancorp Inc. (AMTB) | 100 | 156.9 | +56.9% |
| Visa Inc. (V) | 100 | 169.4 | +69.4% |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) | 100 | 345.8 | +245.8% |
| The Coca-Cola Compa… (KO) | 100 | 177.7 | +77.7% |
| Mastercard Incorpor… (MA) | 100 | 165.6 | +65.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: AMTB vs V vs JPM vs KO vs MA
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
AMTB is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and bank quality is your priority.
- Rev growth 14.0%, EPS growth 386.4%
- NIM 3.7% vs JPM's 2.2%
- Lower P/E (13.1x vs 24.9x)
- +44.5% vs MA's -8.5%
V ranks third and is worth considering specifically for sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.48, Low D/E 66.4%, current ratio 1.08x
- Beta 0.48, yield 0.7%, current ratio 1.08x
- 51.7% margin vs AMTB's 11.2%
JPM is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and valuation efficiency.
- 481.2% 10Y total return vs MA's 438.8%
- PEG 0.83 vs KO's 2.17
KO is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 56 yrs, beta -0.23, yield 2.6%
- 2.6% yield, 56-year raise streak, vs V's 0.7%
MA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth and stability.
- 16.4% NII/revenue growth vs KO's 1.9%
- Beta 0.44 vs AMTB's 0.93
- 29.5% ROA vs AMTB's 0.7%, ROIC 56.5% vs 2.6%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 16.4% NII/revenue growth vs KO's 1.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (13.1x vs 24.9x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 51.7% margin vs AMTB's 11.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.44 vs AMTB's 0.93 | |
| Dividends | 2.6% yield, 56-year raise streak, vs V's 0.7% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +44.5% vs MA's -8.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 29.5% ROA vs AMTB's 0.7%, ROIC 56.5% vs 2.6% |
AMTB vs V vs JPM vs KO vs MA — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
AMTB vs V vs JPM vs KO vs MA — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
JPM leads in 2 of 6 categories
MA leads 1 • KO leads 1 • AMTB leads 0 • V leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — V and MA each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JPM is the larger business by revenue, generating $280.3B annually — 538.5x AMTB's $521M. V is the more profitable business, keeping 51.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to AMTB's 11.2%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $521M | $43.0B | $280.3B | $49.3B | $33.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $54M | $27.6B | $81.4B | $15.5B | $21.6B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $58M | $22.2B | $57.0B | $13.7B | $15.6B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $111M | $21.2B | $100.9B | $12.6B | $17.7B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +55.6% | +81.3% | +60.0% | +61.7% | +83.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +9.7% | +61.1% | +25.9% | +29.3% | +59.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +11.2% | +51.7% | +20.4% | +27.8% | +45.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +21.4% | +49.2% | +36.0% | +25.5% | +52.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | +12.1% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +57.1% | +35.3% | +16.0% | +18.2% | +21.2% |
Valuation Metrics
JPM leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 16.2x trailing earnings, JPM trades at a 49% valuation discount to V's 32.1x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), JPM offers better value at 0.92x vs KO's 2.34x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $991M | $627.8B | $908.6B | $341.7B | $433.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.6B | $632.8B | $1.51T | $376.9B | $442.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 18.73x | 32.08x | 16.22x | 26.12x | 29.65x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 13.13x | 24.88x | 14.60x | 24.27x | 24.89x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 2.03x | 0.92x | 2.34x | 1.41x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 22.07x | 25.10x | 18.52x | 25.45x | 21.52x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.51x | 15.69x | 3.25x | 7.13x | 13.22x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.03x | 16.97x | 2.51x | 9.99x | 56.78x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 10.12x | 29.10x | 9.01x | 64.52x | 25.64x |
Profitability & Efficiency
MA leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MA delivers a 2.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $2 in annual profit, vs $6 for AMTB. V carries lower financial leverage with a 0.66x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JPM's 2.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MA scores 9/9 vs JPM's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +6.3% | +58.9% | +15.9% | +41.1% | +2.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.7% | +22.7% | +1.3% | +13.1% | +29.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +2.6% | +29.2% | +4.5% | +15.8% | +56.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.2% | +36.2% | +8.9% | +17.3% | +64.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 5 | 5 | 7 | 9 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.11x | 0.66x | 2.60x | 1.33x | 2.45x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $571M | $5.0B | $599.0B | $35.2B | $8.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $470M | $20.2B | $343.3B | $10.3B | $10.6B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.0B | $25.2B | $942.4B | $45.5B | $19.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.29x | 26.72x | 0.74x | 10.70x | 27.23x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
JPM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in JPM five years ago would be worth $23,548 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $12,272 for AMTB. Over the past 12 months, AMTB leads with a +44.5% total return vs MA's -8.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors JPM at 33.7% vs AMTB's 8.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +20.6% | -5.2% | +0.8% | +16.4% | -12.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +44.5% | -3.1% | +20.9% | +17.7% | -8.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +28.9% | +47.5% | +138.8% | +39.3% | +33.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +22.7% | +46.4% | +135.5% | +65.3% | +36.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +40.4% | +342.3% | +481.2% | +115.0% | +438.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +8.8% | +13.8% | +33.7% | +11.7% | +10.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — AMTB and KO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KO is the less volatile stock with a -0.23 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AMTB's 0.93 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AMTB currently trades 96.8% from its 52-week high vs MA's 81.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.93x | 0.48x | 0.87x | -0.24x | 0.44x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $24.38 | $359.66 | $338.09 | $84.04 | $601.77 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $15.62 | $293.89 | $269.72 | $65.35 | $464.52 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +96.8% | +91.0% | +96.2% | +94.5% | +81.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 53.4 | 57.0 | 72.1 | 49.2 | 49.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 226K | 6.7M | 7.4M | 13.6M | 3.2M |
Analyst Outlook
KO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: AMTB as "Hold", V as "Buy", JPM as "Buy", KO as "Buy", MA as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 34.8% upside for MA (target: $660) vs 1.7% for AMTB (target: $24). For income investors, KO offers the higher dividend yield at 2.56% vs MA's 0.63%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $24.00 | $368.91 | $339.75 | $86.13 | $660.43 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 7 | 61 | 61 | 48 | 64 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.2% | +0.7% | +1.8% | +2.6% | +0.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 18 | 15 | 56 | 14 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.28 | $2.36 | $5.95 | $2.04 | $3.07 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +2.0% | +2.1% | +3.8% | +0.2% | +2.7% |
JPM leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). MA leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 2 tied.
AMTB vs V vs JPM vs KO vs MA: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is AMTB or V or JPM or KO or MA a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Mastercard Incorporated (MA) is the stronger pick with 16.
4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 9% for The Coca-Cola Company (KO). JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) offers the better valuation at 16. 2x trailing P/E (14. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Visa Inc. (V) a "Buy" — based on 61 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — AMTB or V or JPM or KO or MA?
On trailing P/E, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) is the cheapest at 16. 2x versus Visa Inc. at 32. 1x. On forward P/E, Amerant Bancorp Inc. is actually cheaper at 13. 1x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: JPMorgan Chase & Co. wins at 0. 83x versus The Coca-Cola Company's 2. 17x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — AMTB or V or JPM or KO or MA?
Over the past 5 years, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) delivered a total return of +135. 5%, compared to +22. 7% for Amerant Bancorp Inc. (AMTB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: JPM returned +481. 2% versus AMTB's +40. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — AMTB or V or JPM or KO or MA?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
24β versus Amerant Bancorp Inc. 's 0. 93β — meaning AMTB is approximately -494% more volatile than KO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Visa Inc. (V) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 66% versus 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — AMTB or V or JPM or KO or MA?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Mastercard Incorporated (MA) is pulling ahead at 16.
4% versus 1. 9% for The Coca-Cola Company (KO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Amerant Bancorp Inc. grew EPS 386. 4% year-over-year, compared to 1. 5% for JPMorgan Chase & Co.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — AMTB or V or JPM or KO or MA?
Visa Inc.
(V) is the more profitable company, earning 50. 1% net margin versus 8. 0% for Amerant Bancorp Inc. — meaning it keeps 50. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: V leads at 60. 0% versus 10. 1% for AMTB. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MA leads at 83. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is AMTB or V or JPM or KO or MA more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 83x versus The Coca-Cola Company's 2. 17x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Amerant Bancorp Inc. (AMTB) trades at 13. 1x forward P/E versus 24. 9x for Mastercard Incorporated — 11. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MA: 34. 8% to $660. 43.
08Which pays a better dividend — AMTB or V or JPM or KO or MA?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
The Coca-Cola Company (KO) offers the highest yield at 2. 6%, versus 0. 6% for Mastercard Incorporated (MA).
09Is AMTB or V or JPM or KO or MA better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
24), 2. 6% yield, +115. 0% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (KO: +115. 0%, AMTB: +40. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between AMTB and V and JPM and KO and MA?
These companies operate in different sectors (AMTB (Financial Services) and V (Financial Services) and JPM (Financial Services) and KO (Consumer Defensive) and MA (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: AMTB is a small-cap quality compounder stock; V is a large-cap quality compounder stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock; KO is a large-cap quality compounder stock; MA is a large-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.