AMTD vs NOAH

For growth investors, Noah Holdings Limited (NOAH) is the stronger pick with -21.

1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -55. 9% for AMTD IDEA Group (AMTD). AMTD IDEA Group (AMTD) offers the better valuation at 0. 3x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Noah Holdings Limited (NOAH) a "Buy" — based on 13 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, AMTD IDEA Group (AMTD) is the cheapest at 0.

3x versus Noah Holdings Limited at 2. 2x.

Over the past 5 years, Noah Holdings Limited (NOAH) delivered a total return of -67.

6%, compared to -97. 4% for AMTD IDEA Group (AMTD). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NOAH returned -45. 2% versus AMTD's -91. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), AMTD IDEA Group (AMTD) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

06β versus Noah Holdings Limited's 0. 98β — meaning NOAH is approximately 1449% more volatile than AMTD relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Noah Holdings Limited (NOAH) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 17% for AMTD IDEA Group — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Noah Holdings Limited (NOAH) is pulling ahead at -21.

1% versus -55. 9% for AMTD IDEA Group (AMTD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Noah Holdings Limited grew EPS -53. 5% year-over-year, compared to -68. 5% for AMTD IDEA Group. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

AMTD IDEA Group (AMTD) is the more profitable company, earning 94.

4% net margin versus 18. 3% for Noah Holdings Limited — meaning it keeps 94. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AMTD leads at 48. 2% versus 24. 4% for NOAH. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NOAH leads at 48. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Noah Holdings Limited (NOAH) offers the highest yield at 98. 1%, versus 36. 4% for AMTD IDEA Group (AMTD).

For long-horizon retirement investors, AMTD IDEA Group (AMTD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

06), 36. 4% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (AMTD: -91. 4%, NOAH: -45. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.