Aerospace & Defense
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
AMTM vs MAN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Staffing & Employment Services
AMTM vs MAN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Aerospace & Defense | Staffing & Employment Services |
| Market Cap | $5.99B | $1.41B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $14.27B | $17.96B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $180M | $-13M |
| Gross Margin | 10.9% | 16.7% |
| Operating Margin | 4.3% | 0.8% |
| Forward P/E | 10.2x | 8.3x |
| Total Debt | $4.32B | $2.39B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $437M | $871M |
AMTM vs MAN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Sep 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Amentum Holdings, I… (AMTM) | 100 | 76.1 | -23.9% |
| ManpowerGroup Inc. (MAN) | 100 | 41.4 | -58.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: AMTM vs MAN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
AMTM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 71.6%, EPS growth 179.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 23.3%
- -16.8% 10Y total return vs MAN's -30.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.17, Low D/E 93.6%, current ratio 1.32x
MAN is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.03, yield 4.7%
- Beta 1.03, yield 4.7%, current ratio 1.11x
- Lower P/E (8.3x vs 10.2x)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 71.6% revenue growth vs MAN's 0.6% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (8.3x vs 10.2x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 1.3% margin vs MAN's -0.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.03 vs AMTM's 1.17 | |
| Dividends | 4.7% yield; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +16.3% vs MAN's -17.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 1.6% ROA vs MAN's -0.1%, ROIC 4.3% vs 5.6% |
AMTM vs MAN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
AMTM vs MAN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AMTM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MAN and AMTM operate at a comparable scale, with $18.0B and $14.3B in trailing revenue. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 1.3% (AMTM) to -0.1% (MAN). On growth, MAN holds the edge at +7.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $14.3B | $18.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $1.1B | $236M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $180M | -$13M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $797M | -$161M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +10.9% | +16.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +4.3% | +0.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +1.3% | -0.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +5.6% | -0.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -3.6% | +7.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +9.3% | +36.2% |
Valuation Metrics
MAN leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, MAN's 9.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than AMTM's 9.7x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $6.0B | $1.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $9.9B | $2.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 90.93x | -104.90x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 10.18x | 8.28x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 9.66x | 9.02x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.42x | 0.08x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.30x | 0.69x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 11.61x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
MAN leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
AMTM delivers a 4.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $4 in annual profit, vs $-1 for MAN. AMTM carries lower financial leverage with a 0.94x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MAN's 1.16x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AMTM scores 7/9 vs MAN's 1/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +4.0% | -0.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.6% | -0.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +4.3% | +5.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +5.3% | +6.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 1 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.94x | 1.16x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $3.9B | $1.5B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $437M | $871M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $4.3B | $2.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.92x | 1.98x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
AMTM leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in AMTM five years ago would be worth $8,319 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,514 for MAN. Over the past 12 months, AMTM leads with a +16.3% total return vs MAN's -17.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AMTM at -5.9% vs MAN's -18.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -19.5% | +1.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +16.3% | -17.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -16.8% | -46.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -16.8% | -64.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -16.8% | -30.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -5.9% | -18.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — AMTM and MAN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MAN is the less volatile stock with a 1.03 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AMTM's 1.17 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.17x | 1.03x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $38.11 | $47.34 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $19.11 | $25.15 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +64.4% | +64.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 37.5 | 47.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.6M | 1.1M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates AMTM as "Hold" and MAN as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 47.8% upside for AMTM (target: $36) vs 24.5% for MAN (target: $38). MAN is the only dividend payer here at 4.71% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $36.29 | $37.86 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 11 | 29 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +4.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $1.43 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +2.7% |
AMTM leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). MAN leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). 1 tied.
AMTM vs MAN: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is AMTM or MAN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Amentum Holdings, Inc.
(AMTM) is the stronger pick with 71. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 0. 6% for ManpowerGroup Inc. (MAN). Amentum Holdings, Inc. (AMTM) offers the better valuation at 90. 9x trailing P/E (10. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Amentum Holdings, Inc. (AMTM) a "Hold" — based on 11 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — AMTM or MAN?
On forward P/E, ManpowerGroup Inc.
is actually cheaper at 8. 3x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — AMTM or MAN?
Over the past 5 years, Amentum Holdings, Inc.
(AMTM) delivered a total return of -16. 8%, compared to -64. 9% for ManpowerGroup Inc. (MAN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AMTM returned -16. 8% versus MAN's -30. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — AMTM or MAN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), ManpowerGroup Inc.
(MAN) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 03β versus Amentum Holdings, Inc. 's 1. 17β — meaning AMTM is approximately 14% more volatile than MAN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Amentum Holdings, Inc. (AMTM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 94% versus 116% for ManpowerGroup Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — AMTM or MAN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Amentum Holdings, Inc.
(AMTM) is pulling ahead at 71. 6% versus 0. 6% for ManpowerGroup Inc. (MAN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Amentum Holdings, Inc. grew EPS 179. 4% year-over-year, compared to -109. 6% for ManpowerGroup Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, AMTM leads at 23. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — AMTM or MAN?
Amentum Holdings, Inc.
(AMTM) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 5% net margin versus -0. 1% for ManpowerGroup Inc. — meaning it keeps 0. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AMTM leads at 3. 5% versus 1. 3% for MAN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MAN leads at 16. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is AMTM or MAN more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, ManpowerGroup Inc.
(MAN) trades at 8. 3x forward P/E versus 10. 2x for Amentum Holdings, Inc. — 1. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for AMTM: 47. 8% to $36. 29.
08Which pays a better dividend — AMTM or MAN?
In this comparison, MAN (4.
7% yield) pays a dividend. AMTM does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is AMTM or MAN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, ManpowerGroup Inc.
(MAN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 03), 4. 7% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (MAN: -30. 8%, AMTM: -16. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between AMTM and MAN?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: AMTM is a small-cap high-growth stock; MAN is a small-cap income-oriented stock. MAN pays a dividend while AMTM does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.