Apparel - Retail
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
ANF vs AMZN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Specialty Retail
ANF vs AMZN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Apparel - Retail | Specialty Retail |
| Market Cap | $3.64B | $2.96T |
| Revenue (TTM) | $5.27B | $742.78B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $507M | $90.80B |
| Gross Margin | 58.6% | 50.6% |
| Operating Margin | 13.4% | 11.5% |
| Forward P/E | 8.1x | 35.3x |
| Total Debt | $1.17B | $152.99B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $760M | $86.81B |
ANF vs AMZN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abercrombie & Fitch… (ANF) | 100 | 683.0 | +583.0% |
| Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) | 100 | 225.1 | +125.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ANF vs AMZN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ANF has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.42
- Lower volatility, beta 1.42, Low D/E 82.2%, current ratio 1.49x
- Beta 1.42, current ratio 1.49x
AMZN is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 12.4%, EPS growth 29.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 11.7%
- 7.2% 10Y total return vs ANF's 229.6%
- 12.4% revenue growth vs ANF's 6.4%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 12.4% revenue growth vs ANF's 6.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (8.1x vs 35.3x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 12.2% margin vs ANF's 9.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.42 vs AMZN's 1.51 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +48.6% vs ANF's +14.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 15.1% ROA vs AMZN's 11.5%, ROIC 31.4% vs 14.7% |
ANF vs AMZN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
ANF vs AMZN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — ANF and AMZN each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AMZN is the larger business by revenue, generating $742.8B annually — 141.0x ANF's $5.3B. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 12.2% (AMZN) to 9.6% (ANF). On growth, AMZN holds the edge at +16.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $5.3B | $742.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $862M | $155.9B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $507M | $90.8B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $378M | -$2.5B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +58.6% | +50.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +13.4% | +11.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +9.6% | +12.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +7.2% | -0.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +5.4% | +16.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +3.1% | +74.8% |
Valuation Metrics
ANF leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 7.6x trailing earnings, ANF trades at a 80% valuation discount to AMZN's 38.3x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, ANF's 4.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than AMZN's 20.7x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3.6B | $2.96T |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $4.0B | $3.02T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 7.59x | 38.35x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 8.07x | 35.26x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.37x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 4.72x | 20.74x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.69x | 4.12x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.71x | 7.24x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 9.62x | 384.26x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ANF leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ANF delivers a 38.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $39 in annual profit, vs $23 for AMZN. AMZN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.37x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ANF's 0.82x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AMZN scores 6/9 vs ANF's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +38.5% | +23.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +15.1% | +11.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +31.4% | +14.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +30.5% | +15.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.82x | 0.37x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $409M | $66.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $760M | $86.8B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.2B | $153.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 302.38x | 39.96x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — ANF and AMZN each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ANF five years ago would be worth $19,540 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $16,632 for AMZN. Over the past 12 months, AMZN leads with a +48.6% total return vs ANF's +14.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ANF at 50.5% vs AMZN's 37.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -35.9% | +21.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +14.1% | +48.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +240.8% | +159.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +95.4% | +66.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +229.6% | +715.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +50.5% | +37.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — ANF and AMZN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ANF is the less volatile stock with a 1.42 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AMZN's 1.51 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AMZN currently trades 98.7% from its 52-week high vs ANF's 59.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.42x | 1.51x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $133.11 | $278.56 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $65.45 | $183.85 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +59.6% | +98.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 30.9 | 80.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.2M | 45.6M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates ANF as "Hold" and AMZN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 52.2% upside for ANF (target: $121) vs 11.6% for AMZN (target: $307).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $120.80 | $306.77 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 55 | 94 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +12.4% | 0.0% |
ANF leads in 2 of 6 categories — strongest in Valuation Metrics and Profitability & Efficiency. 3 categories are tied.
ANF vs AMZN: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ANF or AMZN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Amazon.
com, Inc. (AMZN) is the stronger pick with 12. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 6. 4% for Abercrombie & Fitch Co. (ANF). Abercrombie & Fitch Co. (ANF) offers the better valuation at 7. 6x trailing P/E (8. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Amazon. com, Inc. (AMZN) a "Buy" — based on 94 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ANF or AMZN?
On trailing P/E, Abercrombie & Fitch Co.
(ANF) is the cheapest at 7. 6x versus Amazon. com, Inc. at 38. 3x. On forward P/E, Abercrombie & Fitch Co. is actually cheaper at 8. 1x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ANF or AMZN?
Over the past 5 years, Abercrombie & Fitch Co.
(ANF) delivered a total return of +95. 4%, compared to +66. 3% for Amazon. com, Inc. (AMZN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AMZN returned +715. 9% versus ANF's +229. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ANF or AMZN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Abercrombie & Fitch Co.
(ANF) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 42β versus Amazon. com, Inc. 's 1. 51β — meaning AMZN is approximately 6% more volatile than ANF relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Amazon. com, Inc. (AMZN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 37% versus 82% for Abercrombie & Fitch Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ANF or AMZN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Amazon.
com, Inc. (AMZN) is pulling ahead at 12. 4% versus 6. 4% for Abercrombie & Fitch Co. (ANF). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Amazon. com, Inc. grew EPS 29. 7% year-over-year, compared to -2. 2% for Abercrombie & Fitch Co.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ANF leads at 12. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ANF or AMZN?
Amazon.
com, Inc. (AMZN) is the more profitable company, earning 10. 8% net margin versus 9. 6% for Abercrombie & Fitch Co. — meaning it keeps 10. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ANF leads at 13. 3% versus 11. 2% for AMZN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ANF leads at 58. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ANF or AMZN more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Abercrombie & Fitch Co.
(ANF) trades at 8. 1x forward P/E versus 35. 3x for Amazon. com, Inc. — 27. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ANF: 52. 2% to $120. 80.
08Which pays a better dividend — ANF or AMZN?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is ANF or AMZN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Amazon.
com, Inc. (AMZN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+715. 9% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (AMZN: +715. 9%, ANF: +229. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ANF and AMZN?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: ANF is a small-cap deep-value stock; AMZN is a mega-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.