ANGI vs TRMK

For growth investors, Trustmark Corporation (TRMK) is the stronger pick with 34.

8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -13. 0% for Angi Inc. (ANGI). Angi Inc. (ANGI) offers the better valuation at 5. 1x trailing P/E (5. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Angi Inc. (ANGI) a "Hold" — based on 54 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Angi Inc.

(ANGI) is the cheapest at 5. 1x versus Trustmark Corporation at 12. 1x. On forward P/E, Angi Inc. is actually cheaper at 5. 6x.

Over the past 5 years, Trustmark Corporation (TRMK) delivered a total return of +47.

4%, compared to -96. 6% for Angi Inc. (ANGI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TRMK returned +127. 3% versus ANGI's -94. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Trustmark Corporation (TRMK) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

94β versus Angi Inc. 's 1. 85β — meaning ANGI is approximately 95% more volatile than TRMK relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Trustmark Corporation (TRMK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 53% versus 54% for Angi Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Trustmark Corporation (TRMK) is pulling ahead at 34.

8% versus -13. 0% for Angi Inc. (ANGI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Angi Inc. grew EPS 32. 4% year-over-year, compared to 1. 9% for Trustmark Corporation. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Trustmark Corporation (TRMK) is the more profitable company, earning 20.

0% net margin versus 4. 3% for Angi Inc. — meaning it keeps 20. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TRMK leads at 25. 5% versus 7. 6% for ANGI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ANGI leads at 90. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

On forward earnings alone, Angi Inc.

(ANGI) trades at 5. 6x forward P/E versus 11. 5x for Trustmark Corporation — 5. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ANGI: 166. 2% to $12. 75.

In this comparison, TRMK (2.

1% yield) pays a dividend. ANGI does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Trustmark Corporation (TRMK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

94), 2. 1% yield, +127. 3% 10Y return). Angi Inc. (ANGI) carries a higher beta of 1. 85 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (TRMK: +127. 3%, ANGI: -94. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

These companies operate in different sectors (ANGI (Communication Services) and TRMK (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: ANGI is a small-cap deep-value stock; TRMK is a small-cap high-growth stock. TRMK pays a dividend while ANGI does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.