Medical - Instruments & Supplies
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
ANGO vs ISRG vs SYK vs NVCR vs ZBH
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Medical - Instruments & Supplies
Medical - Devices
Medical - Instruments & Supplies
Medical - Devices
ANGO vs ISRG vs SYK vs NVCR vs ZBH — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Medical - Instruments & Supplies | Medical - Instruments & Supplies | Medical - Devices | Medical - Instruments & Supplies | Medical - Devices |
| Market Cap | $466M | $159.85B | $109.33B | $2.04B | $16.12B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $307M | $10.58B | $25.12B | $674M | $8.41B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-28M | $2.98B | $3.25B | $-173M | $761M |
| Gross Margin | 53.7% | 66.3% | 63.5% | 75.2% | 70.0% |
| Operating Margin | -9.4% | 30.5% | 22.4% | -27.2% | 15.6% |
| Forward P/E | — | 43.3x | 19.1x | — | 9.7x |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $303M | $14.86B | $290M | $7.52B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $56M | $3.37B | $4.01B | $103M | $592M |
ANGO vs ISRG vs SYK vs NVCR vs ZBH — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| AngioDynamics, Inc. (ANGO) | 100 | 109.7 | +9.7% |
| Intuitive Surgical,… (ISRG) | 100 | 232.8 | +132.8% |
| Stryker Corporation (SYK) | 100 | 145.8 | +45.8% |
| NovoCure Limited (NVCR) | 100 | 26.5 | -73.5% |
| Zimmer Biomet Holdi… (ZBH) | 100 | 67.2 | -32.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ANGO vs ISRG vs SYK vs NVCR vs ZBH
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ANGO ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.
- +20.7% vs SYK's -24.5%
ISRG carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 20.5%, EPS growth 22.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 17.4%
- 5.5% 10Y total return vs SYK's 179.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.00, Low D/E 1.7%, current ratio 4.87x
- 20.5% revenue growth vs ANGO's -3.8%
SYK is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and valuation efficiency is your priority.
- Dividend streak 34 yrs, beta 0.52, yield 1.2%
- PEG 1.28 vs ISRG's 1.99
- Beta 0.52, yield 1.2%, current ratio 1.89x
- Beta 0.52 vs NVCR's 2.15, lower leverage
Among these 5 stocks, NVCR doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
ZBH is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Better valuation composite
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 20.5% revenue growth vs ANGO's -3.8% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 28.2% margin vs NVCR's -25.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.52 vs NVCR's 2.15, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 1.2% yield, 34-year raise streak, vs ZBH's 1.2%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +20.7% vs SYK's -24.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 14.8% ROA vs NVCR's -16.5%, ROIC 15.0% vs -16.4% |
ANGO vs ISRG vs SYK vs NVCR vs ZBH — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
ANGO vs ISRG vs SYK vs NVCR vs ZBH — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ISRG leads in 3 of 6 categories
ZBH leads 1 • SYK leads 1 • ANGO leads 0 • NVCR leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ISRG leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SYK is the larger business by revenue, generating $25.1B annually — 81.7x ANGO's $307M. ISRG is the more profitable business, keeping 28.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NVCR's -25.7%. On growth, ISRG holds the edge at +23.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $307M | $10.6B | $25.1B | $674M | $8.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$5M | $3.8B | $6.3B | -$165M | $2.3B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$28M | $3.0B | $3.2B | -$173M | $761M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$9M | $2.8B | $4.3B | -$48M | $1.8B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +53.7% | +66.3% | +63.5% | +75.2% | +70.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -9.4% | +30.5% | +22.4% | -27.2% | +15.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -9.0% | +28.2% | +12.9% | -25.7% | +9.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -3.0% | +26.8% | +17.1% | -7.1% | +21.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +9.0% | +23.0% | +11.4% | +12.3% | +9.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +42.3% | +18.8% | +56.0% | -100.0% | +34.1% |
Valuation Metrics
ZBH leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 23.2x trailing earnings, ZBH trades at a 59% valuation discount to ISRG's 57.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), SYK offers better value at 2.29x vs ISRG's 2.63x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $466M | $159.8B | $109.3B | $2.0B | $16.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $410M | $156.8B | $120.2B | $2.2B | $23.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -13.49x | 57.19x | 33.98x | -14.66x | 23.19x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 43.35x | 19.06x | — | 9.71x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 2.63x | 2.29x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 43.28x | 19.76x | — | 9.38x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.59x | 15.88x | 4.35x | 3.11x | 1.96x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.51x | 9.10x | 4.87x | 5.86x | 1.29x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 64.18x | 25.53x | — | 10.95x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ISRG leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ISRG delivers a 16.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $17 in annual profit, vs $-51 for NVCR. ISRG carries lower financial leverage with a 0.02x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NVCR's 0.85x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ISRG scores 6/9 vs ZBH's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -15.7% | +16.9% | +15.0% | -50.8% | +5.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -10.3% | +14.8% | +6.9% | -16.5% | +3.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -22.9% | +15.0% | +11.4% | -16.4% | +5.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -18.6% | +16.5% | +13.0% | -28.9% | +6.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.02x | 0.66x | 0.85x | 0.59x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$56M | -$3.1B | $10.8B | $187M | $6.9B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $56M | $3.4B | $4.0B | $103M | $592M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $303M | $14.9B | $290M | $7.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -258.19x | — | 6.72x | -96.80x | 4.08x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ISRG leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ISRG five years ago would be worth $16,174 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $983 for NVCR. Over the past 12 months, ANGO leads with a +20.7% total return vs SYK's -24.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ISRG at 14.1% vs NVCR's -36.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -11.7% | -19.9% | -17.8% | +36.4% | -8.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +20.7% | -16.4% | -24.5% | +2.6% | -12.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +25.0% | +48.5% | +2.4% | -74.2% | -38.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -51.6% | +61.7% | +17.5% | -90.2% | -47.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -9.7% | +549.2% | +179.2% | +38.5% | -18.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +7.7% | +14.1% | +0.8% | -36.4% | -14.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — SYK and NVCR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SYK is the less volatile stock with a 0.52 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NVCR's 2.15 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NVCR currently trades 89.2% from its 52-week high vs SYK's 70.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.26x | 1.00x | 0.52x | 2.15x | 0.60x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $13.99 | $603.88 | $404.87 | $20.06 | $108.29 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $8.36 | $427.84 | $284.97 | $9.82 | $79.83 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +80.1% | +74.5% | +70.5% | +89.2% | +76.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 57.5 | 43.6 | 26.6 | 70.9 | 36.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 397K | 1.8M | 2.1M | 1.4M | 2.2M |
Analyst Outlook
SYK leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ANGO as "Hold", ISRG as "Buy", SYK as "Buy", NVCR as "Buy", ZBH as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 87.3% upside for NVCR (target: $34) vs 17.0% for ZBH (target: $96). For income investors, SYK offers the higher dividend yield at 1.18% vs ZBH's 1.16%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $16.50 | $622.60 | $389.62 | $33.50 | $96.33 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 11 | 55 | 50 | 15 | 42 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +1.2% | — | +1.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 34 | — | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $3.36 | — | $0.96 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.4% | +1.4% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +3.0% |
ISRG leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). ZBH leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
ANGO vs ISRG vs SYK vs NVCR vs ZBH: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ANGO or ISRG or SYK or NVCR or ZBH a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Intuitive Surgical, Inc.
(ISRG) is the stronger pick with 20. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -3. 8% for AngioDynamics, Inc. (ANGO). Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc. (ZBH) offers the better valuation at 23. 2x trailing P/E (9. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Intuitive Surgical, Inc. (ISRG) a "Buy" — based on 55 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ANGO or ISRG or SYK or NVCR or ZBH?
On trailing P/E, Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc.
(ZBH) is the cheapest at 23. 2x versus Intuitive Surgical, Inc. at 57. 2x. On forward P/E, Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc. is actually cheaper at 9. 7x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Stryker Corporation wins at 1. 28x versus Intuitive Surgical, Inc. 's 1. 99x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ANGO or ISRG or SYK or NVCR or ZBH?
Over the past 5 years, Intuitive Surgical, Inc.
(ISRG) delivered a total return of +61. 7%, compared to -90. 2% for NovoCure Limited (NVCR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ISRG returned +549. 2% versus ZBH's -18. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ANGO or ISRG or SYK or NVCR or ZBH?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Stryker Corporation (SYK) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
52β versus NovoCure Limited's 2. 15β — meaning NVCR is approximately 310% more volatile than SYK relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Intuitive Surgical, Inc. (ISRG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 85% for NovoCure Limited — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ANGO or ISRG or SYK or NVCR or ZBH?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Intuitive Surgical, Inc.
(ISRG) is pulling ahead at 20. 5% versus -3. 8% for AngioDynamics, Inc. (ANGO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: AngioDynamics, Inc. grew EPS 81. 9% year-over-year, compared to -19. 9% for Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ISRG leads at 17. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ANGO or ISRG or SYK or NVCR or ZBH?
Intuitive Surgical, Inc.
(ISRG) is the more profitable company, earning 28. 4% net margin versus -20. 8% for NovoCure Limited — meaning it keeps 28. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ISRG leads at 29. 3% versus -23. 5% for NVCR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NVCR leads at 74. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ANGO or ISRG or SYK or NVCR or ZBH more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Stryker Corporation (SYK) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 28x versus Intuitive Surgical, Inc. 's 1. 99x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc. (ZBH) trades at 9. 7x forward P/E versus 43. 3x for Intuitive Surgical, Inc. — 33. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NVCR: 87. 3% to $33. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — ANGO or ISRG or SYK or NVCR or ZBH?
In this comparison, SYK (1.
2% yield), ZBH (1. 2% yield) pay a dividend. ANGO, ISRG, NVCR do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is ANGO or ISRG or SYK or NVCR or ZBH better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Stryker Corporation (SYK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
52), 1. 2% yield, +179. 2% 10Y return). NovoCure Limited (NVCR) carries a higher beta of 2. 15 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (SYK: +179. 2%, NVCR: +38. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ANGO and ISRG and SYK and NVCR and ZBH?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: ANGO is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ISRG is a mid-cap high-growth stock; SYK is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; NVCR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ZBH is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. SYK, ZBH pay a dividend while ANGO, ISRG, NVCR do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.