Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
ANIP vs LNTH vs RMD vs AMRX vs TEVA
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic
Medical - Instruments & Supplies
Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic
Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic
ANIP vs LNTH vs RMD vs AMRX vs TEVA — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic | Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic | Medical - Instruments & Supplies | Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic | Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic |
| Market Cap | $1.78B | $5.92B | $30.15B | $4.31B | $41.93B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $883M | $1.55B | $5.54B | $3.02B | $17.35B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $78M | $279M | $1.52B | $72M | $1.56B |
| Gross Margin | 69.1% | 60.5% | 61.7% | 36.9% | 52.1% |
| Operating Margin | 12.6% | 18.8% | 34.3% | -0.2% | 13.2% |
| Forward P/E | 9.2x | 17.5x | 18.8x | 13.8x | 14.5x |
| Total Debt | $325M | $738K | $852M | $124M | $17.38B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $286M | $359M | $1.21B | $282M | $3.56B |
ANIP vs LNTH vs RMD vs AMRX vs TEVA — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| ANI Pharmaceuticals… (ANIP) | 100 | 270.2 | +170.2% |
| Lantheus Holdings, … (LNTH) | 100 | 662.8 | +562.8% |
| ResMed Inc. (RMD) | 100 | 128.7 | +28.7% |
| Amneal Pharmaceutic… (AMRX) | 100 | 281.7 | +181.7% |
| Teva Pharmaceutical… (TEVA) | 100 | 287.4 | +187.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ANIP vs LNTH vs RMD vs AMRX vs TEVA
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ANIP is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 43.8%, EPS growth 419.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 40.8%
- 43.8% revenue growth vs LNTH's 0.5%
- Lower P/E (9.2x vs 14.5x)
LNTH ranks third and is worth considering specifically for long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 41.9% 10Y total return vs RMD's 293.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.47, Low D/E 0.1%, current ratio 2.70x
- Beta 0.47 vs AMRX's 1.17, lower leverage
RMD carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 14 yrs, beta 0.66, yield 1.0%
- Beta 0.66, yield 1.0%, current ratio 3.44x
- 27.4% margin vs AMRX's 2.4%
- 1.0% yield, 14-year raise streak, vs ANIP's 0.1%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
Among these 5 stocks, AMRX doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
TEVA is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +104.6% vs RMD's -14.5%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 43.8% revenue growth vs LNTH's 0.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.2x vs 14.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 27.4% margin vs AMRX's 2.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.47 vs AMRX's 1.17, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 1.0% yield, 14-year raise streak, vs ANIP's 0.1%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +104.6% vs RMD's -14.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 18.0% ROA vs AMRX's 2.0%, ROIC 22.8% vs -0.2% |
ANIP vs LNTH vs RMD vs AMRX vs TEVA — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
ANIP vs LNTH vs RMD vs AMRX vs TEVA — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
RMD leads in 2 of 6 categories
LNTH leads 2 • ANIP leads 1 • AMRX leads 0 • TEVA leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — ANIP and RMD each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TEVA is the larger business by revenue, generating $17.3B annually — 19.6x ANIP's $883M. RMD is the more profitable business, keeping 27.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to AMRX's 2.4%. On growth, ANIP holds the edge at +29.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $883M | $1.5B | $5.5B | $3.0B | $17.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $203M | $347M | $2.1B | $169M | $3.3B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $78M | $279M | $1.5B | $72M | $1.6B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $128M | $372M | $1.8B | $150M | $1.2B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +69.1% | +60.5% | +61.7% | +36.9% | +52.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +12.6% | +18.8% | +34.3% | -0.2% | +13.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +8.9% | +18.0% | +27.4% | +2.4% | +9.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +14.5% | +24.0% | +31.7% | +5.0% | +6.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +29.6% | +1.2% | +10.8% | +11.5% | +2.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +3.1% | +76.5% | +9.3% | +2.1% | +72.2% |
Valuation Metrics
ANIP leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 21.8x trailing earnings, RMD trades at a 65% valuation discount to AMRX's 62.4x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, ANIP's 9.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than TEVA's 17.6x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.8B | $5.9B | $30.1B | $4.3B | $41.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.8B | $5.6B | $29.8B | $4.2B | $55.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 25.27x | 26.69x | 21.76x | 62.36x | 30.01x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 9.25x | 17.52x | 18.78x | 13.81x | 14.55x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 1.25x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 8.99x | 14.61x | 15.51x | — | 17.65x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.02x | 3.84x | 5.86x | 1.43x | 2.43x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.29x | 5.72x | 5.11x | 4.62x | 5.34x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 9.62x | 16.73x | 18.14x | 15.98x | 36.52x |
Profitability & Efficiency
RMD leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
RMD delivers a 24.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $24 in annual profit, vs $7 for AMRX. LNTH carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TEVA's 2.20x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), RMD scores 8/9 vs LNTH's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +14.5% | +24.3% | +24.4% | +7.5% | +20.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +5.4% | +12.4% | +18.0% | +2.0% | +3.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +11.2% | +30.6% | +22.8% | -0.2% | +7.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +9.9% | +17.1% | +25.7% | -0.2% | +8.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 5 | 8 | 8 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.60x | 0.00x | 0.14x | 0.13x | 2.20x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $40M | -$358M | -$358M | -$158M | $13.8B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $286M | $359M | $1.2B | $282M | $3.6B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $325M | $738,000 | $852M | $124M | $17.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.82x | 11.72x | 66.06x | 2.09x | 2.51x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
LNTH leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in LNTH five years ago would be worth $41,420 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $11,100 for RMD. Over the past 12 months, TEVA leads with a +104.6% total return vs RMD's -14.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AMRX at 89.4% vs RMD's -2.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +7.0% | +35.3% | -15.2% | +8.4% | +16.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +18.5% | +13.1% | -14.5% | +90.0% | +104.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +97.1% | -4.0% | -8.4% | +579.2% | +297.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +117.4% | +314.2% | +11.0% | +163.8% | +246.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +84.7% | +4192.5% | +293.8% | -54.9% | -28.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +25.4% | -1.4% | -2.9% | +89.4% | +58.4% |
Risk & Volatility
LNTH leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
LNTH is the less volatile stock with a 0.47 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AMRX's 1.17 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. LNTH currently trades 97.8% from its 52-week high vs RMD's 70.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.63x | 0.47x | 0.66x | 1.17x | 1.13x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $99.50 | $93.00 | $293.81 | $15.20 | $37.35 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $56.71 | $47.25 | $198.64 | $7.02 | $14.99 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +84.3% | +97.8% | +70.4% | +90.3% | +96.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 64.4 | 61.2 | 35.6 | 62.7 | 73.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 328K | 886K | 1.1M | 1.7M | 6.6M |
Analyst Outlook
RMD leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ANIP as "Buy", LNTH as "Buy", RMD as "Buy", AMRX as "Buy", TEVA as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 47.8% upside for ANIP (target: $124) vs 8.3% for TEVA (target: $39). RMD is the only dividend payer here at 1.02% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $124.00 | $101.00 | $281.29 | $17.00 | $39.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 10 | 17 | 35 | 16 | 46 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.1% | — | +1.0% | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 | 14 | 0 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.05 | — | $2.11 | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.7% | +5.1% | +1.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
RMD leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Analyst Outlook). LNTH leads in 2 (Total Returns, Risk & Volatility). 1 tied.
ANIP vs LNTH vs RMD vs AMRX vs TEVA: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ANIP or LNTH or RMD or AMRX or TEVA a better buy right now?
For growth investors, ANI Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(ANIP) is the stronger pick with 43. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 0. 5% for Lantheus Holdings, Inc. (LNTH). ResMed Inc. (RMD) offers the better valuation at 21. 8x trailing P/E (18. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate ANI Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (ANIP) a "Buy" — based on 10 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ANIP or LNTH or RMD or AMRX or TEVA?
On trailing P/E, ResMed Inc.
(RMD) is the cheapest at 21. 8x versus Amneal Pharmaceuticals, Inc. at 62. 4x. On forward P/E, ANI Pharmaceuticals, Inc. is actually cheaper at 9. 2x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ANIP or LNTH or RMD or AMRX or TEVA?
Over the past 5 years, Lantheus Holdings, Inc.
(LNTH) delivered a total return of +314. 2%, compared to +11. 0% for ResMed Inc. (RMD). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: LNTH returned +41. 9% versus AMRX's -54. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ANIP or LNTH or RMD or AMRX or TEVA?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Lantheus Holdings, Inc.
(LNTH) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 47β versus Amneal Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 's 1. 17β — meaning AMRX is approximately 150% more volatile than LNTH relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Lantheus Holdings, Inc. (LNTH) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 2% for Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Limited — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ANIP or LNTH or RMD or AMRX or TEVA?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), ANI Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(ANIP) is pulling ahead at 43. 8% versus 0. 5% for Lantheus Holdings, Inc. (LNTH). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: ANI Pharmaceuticals, Inc. grew EPS 419. 2% year-over-year, compared to -21. 8% for Lantheus Holdings, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ANIP leads at 40. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ANIP or LNTH or RMD or AMRX or TEVA?
ResMed Inc.
(RMD) is the more profitable company, earning 27. 2% net margin versus 2. 4% for Amneal Pharmaceuticals, Inc. — meaning it keeps 27. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: RMD leads at 32. 7% versus -0. 2% for AMRX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ANIP leads at 69. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ANIP or LNTH or RMD or AMRX or TEVA more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, ANI Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(ANIP) trades at 9. 2x forward P/E versus 18. 8x for ResMed Inc. — 9. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ANIP: 47. 8% to $124. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — ANIP or LNTH or RMD or AMRX or TEVA?
In this comparison, RMD (1.
0% yield) pays a dividend. ANIP, LNTH, AMRX, TEVA do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is ANIP or LNTH or RMD or AMRX or TEVA better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, ResMed Inc.
(RMD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 66), 1. 0% yield, +293. 8% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (RMD: +293. 8%, AMRX: -54. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ANIP and LNTH and RMD and AMRX and TEVA?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: ANIP is a small-cap high-growth stock; LNTH is a small-cap quality compounder stock; RMD is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; AMRX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; TEVA is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. RMD pays a dividend while ANIP, LNTH, AMRX, TEVA do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.