ANTA vs CORZ vs RIOT vs MARA

For growth investors, Antalpha Platform Holding Company (ANTA) is the stronger pick with 321.

0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -37. 5% for Core Scientific, Inc. (CORZ). Antalpha Platform Holding Company (ANTA) offers the better valuation at 51. 3x trailing P/E (24. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Antalpha Platform Holding Company (ANTA) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On forward P/E, Antalpha Platform Holding Company is actually cheaper at 24.

4x.

Over the past 5 years, Core Scientific, Inc.

(CORZ) delivered a total return of +550. 0%, compared to -59. 5% for Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc. (MARA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: RIOT returned +787. 3% versus MARA's -51. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Antalpha Platform Holding Company (ANTA) is the lower-risk stock at 1.

63β versus Riot Platforms, Inc. 's 3. 87β — meaning RIOT is approximately 138% more volatile than ANTA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Riot Platforms, Inc. (RIOT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 10% versus 9% for Antalpha Platform Holding Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Antalpha Platform Holding Company (ANTA) is pulling ahead at 321.

0% versus -37. 5% for Core Scientific, Inc. (CORZ). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Antalpha Platform Holding Company grew EPS 165. 5% year-over-year, compared to -673. 5% for Riot Platforms, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Antalpha Platform Holding Company (ANTA) is the more profitable company, earning 9.

3% net margin versus -144. 6% for Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 9. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ANTA leads at 6. 7% versus -90. 6% for MARA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ANTA leads at 37. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

On forward earnings alone, Antalpha Platform Holding Company (ANTA) trades at 24.

4x forward P/E versus 267. 1x for Core Scientific, Inc. — 242. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MARA: 27. 0% to $16. 13.

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Riot Platforms, Inc.

(RIOT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+787. 3% 10Y return). Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc. (MARA) carries a higher beta of 3. 11 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (RIOT: +787. 3%, MARA: -51. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

These companies operate in different sectors (ANTA (Financial Services) and CORZ (Technology) and RIOT (Financial Services) and MARA (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: ANTA is a small-cap high-growth stock; CORZ is a small-cap quality compounder stock; RIOT is a small-cap high-growth stock; MARA is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.