Biotechnology
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
ANTX vs INSM vs JPM vs PRAX vs CRL
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Banks - Diversified
Biotechnology
Medical - Diagnostics & Research
ANTX vs INSM vs JPM vs PRAX vs CRL — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Banks - Diversified | Biotechnology | Medical - Diagnostics & Research |
| Market Cap | $130M | $21.21B | $896.00B | $7.70B | $9.03B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $820M | $280.33B | $0.00 | $4.03B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-35M | $-1.18B | $57.05B | $-327M | $-185M |
| Gross Margin | — | 81.6% | 60.0% | — | 31.9% |
| Operating Margin | — | -137.7% | 25.9% | — | 11.8% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | 14.4x | — | 16.9x |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $768M | $942.38B | $110K | $3.07B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $20M | $510M | $343.34B | $357M | $214M |
ANTX vs INSM vs JPM vs PRAX vs CRL — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Mar 22 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| AN2 Therapeutics, I… (ANTX) | 100 | 31.5 | -68.5% |
| Insmed Incorporated (INSM) | 100 | 416.4 | +316.4% |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) | 100 | 235.3 | +135.3% |
| Praxis Precision Me… (PRAX) | 100 | 174.0 | +74.0% |
| Charles River Labor… (CRL) | 100 | 66.0 | -34.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ANTX vs INSM vs JPM vs PRAX vs CRL
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ANTX is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night and defensive is your priority.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.42, current ratio 6.87x
- Beta 0.42, current ratio 6.87x
- 189.3% revenue growth vs PRAX's -100.0%
- Beta 0.42 vs PRAX's 1.55
INSM is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 66.7%, EPS growth -15.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 35.2%
- 8.5% 10Y total return vs JPM's 465.8%
JPM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability.
- Dividend streak 15 yrs, beta 0.94, yield 1.9%
- Lower P/E (14.4x vs 16.9x)
- 20.4% margin vs INSM's -144.4%
- 1.9% yield; 15-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
PRAX ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.
- +491.9% vs INSM's +1.0%
Among these 5 stocks, CRL doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 189.3% revenue growth vs PRAX's -100.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (14.4x vs 16.9x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 20.4% margin vs INSM's -144.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.42 vs PRAX's 1.55 | |
| Dividends | 1.9% yield; 15-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +491.9% vs INSM's +1.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 1.3% ROA vs INSM's -51.6%, ROIC 4.5% vs -86.5% |
ANTX vs INSM vs JPM vs PRAX vs CRL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
ANTX vs INSM vs JPM vs PRAX vs CRL — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
JPM leads in 2 of 6 categories
PRAX leads 1 • ANTX leads 0 • INSM leads 0 • CRL leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — INSM and JPM each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JPM and PRAX operate at a comparable scale, with $280.3B and $0 in trailing revenue. JPM is the more profitable business, keeping 20.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to INSM's -144.4%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $820M | $280.3B | $0 | $4.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$37M | -$1.1B | $81.4B | -$357M | $824M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$35M | -$1.2B | $57.0B | -$327M | -$185M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$31M | -$952M | $100.9B | -$283M | $391M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +81.6% | +60.0% | — | +31.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | -137.7% | +25.9% | — | +11.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | -144.4% | +20.4% | — | -4.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | -116.1% | +36.0% | — | +9.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +2.3% | — | — | +1.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +17.1% | +46.5% | +16.0% | +2.7% | -160.0% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — JPM and CRL each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, CRL's 13.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than JPM's 18.4x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $130M | $21.2B | $896.0B | $7.7B | $9.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $110M | $21.5B | $1.50T | $7.3B | $11.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -4.09x | -15.27x | 16.00x | -19.77x | -64.44x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 14.40x | — | 16.90x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 0.90x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | 18.36x | — | 13.04x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 34.97x | 3.20x | — | 2.25x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.70x | 28.29x | 2.47x | 6.83x | 2.89x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 8.88x | — | 17.42x |
Profitability & Efficiency
JPM leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
JPM delivers a 15.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $16 in annual profit, vs $-130 for INSM. PRAX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JPM's 2.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), JPM scores 5/9 vs ANTX's 1/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -52.3% | -130.1% | +15.9% | -43.0% | -5.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -47.3% | -51.6% | +1.3% | -40.2% | -2.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -61.1% | -86.5% | +4.5% | -65.0% | +6.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -56.4% | -66.8% | +8.9% | -49.3% | +8.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 3 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 1.04x | 2.60x | 0.00x | 0.95x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$20M | $258M | $599.0B | -$357M | $2.9B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $20M | $510M | $343.3B | $357M | $214M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $768M | $942.4B | $110,000 | $3.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | -14.31x | 0.74x | — | 4.29x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
PRAX leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in INSM five years ago would be worth $32,649 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,078 for ANTX. Over the past 12 months, PRAX leads with a +491.9% total return vs INSM's +1.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PRAX at 164.8% vs ANTX's -13.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +327.0% | -44.8% | -0.5% | -6.9% | -7.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +319.5% | +1.0% | +21.8% | +491.9% | +23.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -34.4% | +401.8% | +138.2% | +1757.4% | -8.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -69.2% | +226.5% | +118.2% | -14.2% | -47.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -39.4% | +845.4% | +465.8% | -36.1% | +122.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -13.1% | +71.2% | +33.6% | +164.8% | -3.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — ANTX and JPM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ANTX is the less volatile stock with a 0.42 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PRAX's 1.55 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. JPM currently trades 95.1% from its 52-week high vs INSM's 46.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.42x | 0.66x | 0.94x | 1.55x | 1.39x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $6.91 | $212.75 | $337.25 | $366.52 | $228.88 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.00 | $90.39 | $262.71 | $37.19 | $143.06 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +68.6% | +46.0% | +95.1% | +72.7% | +81.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 54.5 | 36.9 | 59.1 | 31.9 | 60.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 261K | 3.2M | 7.0M | 396K | 767K |
Analyst Outlook
JPM leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ANTX as "Buy", INSM as "Buy", JPM as "Buy", PRAX as "Buy", CRL as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 127.8% upside for PRAX (target: $607) vs 5.9% for JPM (target: $340). JPM is the only dividend payer here at 1.86% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $9.00 | $206.50 | $339.75 | $607.15 | $213.17 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 8 | 35 | 61 | 16 | 37 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +1.9% | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | — | 15 | — | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $5.95 | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +3.9% | 0.0% | +4.0% |
JPM leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Analyst Outlook). PRAX leads in 1 (Total Returns). 3 tied.
ANTX vs INSM vs JPM vs PRAX vs CRL: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ANTX or INSM or JPM or PRAX or CRL a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Insmed Incorporated (INSM) is the stronger pick with 66.
7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX). JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) offers the better valuation at 16. 0x trailing P/E (14. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate AN2 Therapeutics, Inc. (ANTX) a "Buy" — based on 8 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ANTX or INSM or JPM or PRAX or CRL?
On forward P/E, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
is actually cheaper at 14. 4x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ANTX or INSM or JPM or PRAX or CRL?
Over the past 5 years, Insmed Incorporated (INSM) delivered a total return of +226.
5%, compared to -69. 2% for AN2 Therapeutics, Inc. (ANTX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: INSM returned +845. 4% versus ANTX's -39. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ANTX or INSM or JPM or PRAX or CRL?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), AN2 Therapeutics, Inc.
(ANTX) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 42β versus Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. 's 1. 55β — meaning PRAX is approximately 268% more volatile than ANTX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ANTX or INSM or JPM or PRAX or CRL?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Insmed Incorporated (INSM) is pulling ahead at 66.
7% versus -100. 0% for Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: AN2 Therapeutics, Inc. grew EPS 32. 6% year-over-year, compared to -1555. 0% for Charles River Laboratories International, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, INSM leads at 35. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ANTX or INSM or JPM or PRAX or CRL?
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) is the more profitable company, earning 20. 4% net margin versus -210. 5% for Insmed Incorporated — meaning it keeps 20. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: JPM leads at 26. 0% versus -194. 0% for INSM. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — INSM leads at 79. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ANTX or INSM or JPM or PRAX or CRL more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) trades at 14. 4x forward P/E versus 16. 9x for Charles River Laboratories International, Inc. — 2. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PRAX: 127. 8% to $607. 15.
08Which pays a better dividend — ANTX or INSM or JPM or PRAX or CRL?
In this comparison, JPM (1.
9% yield) pays a dividend. ANTX, INSM, PRAX, CRL do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is ANTX or INSM or JPM or PRAX or CRL better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Insmed Incorporated (INSM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
66), +845. 4% 10Y return). Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX) carries a higher beta of 1. 55 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (INSM: +845. 4%, PRAX: -36. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ANTX and INSM and JPM and PRAX and CRL?
These companies operate in different sectors (ANTX (Healthcare) and INSM (Healthcare) and JPM (Financial Services) and PRAX (Healthcare) and CRL (Healthcare)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: ANTX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; INSM is a mid-cap high-growth stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock; PRAX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CRL is a small-cap quality compounder stock. JPM pays a dividend while ANTX, INSM, PRAX, CRL do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.