REIT - Mortgage
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
AOMR vs MITT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
REIT - Mortgage
AOMR vs MITT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | REIT - Mortgage | REIT - Mortgage |
| Market Cap | $221M | $250M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $104M | $493M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $16M | $34M |
| Gross Margin | 67.7% | 94.2% |
| Operating Margin | 43.7% | 93.3% |
| Forward P/E | 6.8x | 7.2x |
| Total Debt | $308M | $8.10B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $42M | $76M |
AOMR vs MITT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Angel Oak Mortgage,… (AOMR) | 100 | 49.6 | -50.4% |
| TPG Mortgage Invest… (MITT) | 100 | 61.6 | -38.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: AOMR vs MITT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
AOMR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.67, yield 14.3%
- Rev growth 158.1%, EPS growth 53.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.67, current ratio 0.17x
MITT is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- -15.9% 10Y total return vs AOMR's -18.6%
- +36.1% vs AOMR's +4.1%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 158.1% FFO/revenue growth vs MITT's 14.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (6.8x vs 7.2x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 15.6% margin vs MITT's 6.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.67 vs MITT's 0.90, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 14.3% yield, vs MITT's 10.0% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +36.1% vs AOMR's +4.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 0.6% ROA vs MITT's 0.4%, ROIC 8.8% vs 4.5% |
AOMR vs MITT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
AOMR vs MITT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MITT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MITT is the larger business by revenue, generating $493M annually — 4.8x AOMR's $104M. AOMR is the more profitable business, keeping 15.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MITT's 6.8%. On growth, MITT holds the edge at +20.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $104M | $493M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $45M | $457M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $16M | $34M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$136M | $68M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +67.7% | +94.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +43.7% | +93.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +15.6% | +6.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -131.8% | +13.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -18.0% | +20.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -134.5% | -2.3% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — AOMR and MITT each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 4.9x trailing earnings, AOMR trades at a 44% valuation discount to MITT's 8.8x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, AOMR's 3.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than MITT's 18.3x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $221M | $250M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $487M | $8.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 4.93x | 8.77x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 6.79x | 7.25x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.04x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 3.31x | 18.25x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.66x | 0.53x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.81x | 0.44x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 11.89x | 4.20x |
Profitability & Efficiency
AOMR leads this category, winning 9 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
AOMR delivers a 6.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $6 in annual profit, vs $6 for MITT. AOMR carries lower financial leverage with a 1.15x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MITT's 14.45x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AOMR scores 7/9 vs MITT's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +6.2% | +6.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.6% | +0.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +8.8% | +4.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +6.7% | +6.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.15x | 14.45x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $266M | $8.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $42M | $76M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $308M | $8.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.43x | 1.12x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MITT leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MITT five years ago would be worth $9,459 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,139 for AOMR. Over the past 12 months, MITT leads with a +36.1% total return vs AOMR's +4.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MITT at 23.6% vs AOMR's 17.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +7.0% | -5.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +4.1% | +36.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +61.1% | +88.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -18.6% | -5.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -18.6% | -15.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +17.2% | +23.6% |
Risk & Volatility
AOMR leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
AOMR is the less volatile stock with a 0.67 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MITT's 0.90 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.67x | 0.90x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $10.34 | $9.27 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $7.96 | $6.33 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +85.8% | +85.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 45.7 | 51.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 72K | 280K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — AOMR and MITT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates AOMR as "Buy" and MITT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 22.1% upside for MITT (target: $10) vs 9.9% for AOMR (target: $10). For income investors, AOMR offers the higher dividend yield at 14.34% vs MITT's 9.98%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $9.75 | $9.63 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 7 | 18 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +14.3% | +10.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.27 | $0.79 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
MITT leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). AOMR leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Risk & Volatility). 2 tied.
AOMR vs MITT: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is AOMR or MITT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Angel Oak Mortgage, Inc.
(AOMR) is the stronger pick with 158. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 14. 4% for TPG Mortgage Investment Trust Inc (MITT). Angel Oak Mortgage, Inc. (AOMR) offers the better valuation at 4. 9x trailing P/E (6. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Angel Oak Mortgage, Inc. (AOMR) a "Buy" — based on 7 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — AOMR or MITT?
On trailing P/E, Angel Oak Mortgage, Inc.
(AOMR) is the cheapest at 4. 9x versus TPG Mortgage Investment Trust Inc at 8. 8x. On forward P/E, Angel Oak Mortgage, Inc. is actually cheaper at 6. 8x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — AOMR or MITT?
Over the past 5 years, TPG Mortgage Investment Trust Inc (MITT) delivered a total return of -5.
4%, compared to -18. 6% for Angel Oak Mortgage, Inc. (AOMR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MITT returned -15. 9% versus AOMR's -18. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — AOMR or MITT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Angel Oak Mortgage, Inc.
(AOMR) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 67β versus TPG Mortgage Investment Trust Inc's 0. 90β — meaning MITT is approximately 34% more volatile than AOMR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Angel Oak Mortgage, Inc. (AOMR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 115% versus 14% for TPG Mortgage Investment Trust Inc — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — AOMR or MITT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Angel Oak Mortgage, Inc.
(AOMR) is pulling ahead at 158. 1% versus 14. 4% for TPG Mortgage Investment Trust Inc (MITT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Angel Oak Mortgage, Inc. grew EPS 53. 8% year-over-year, compared to -26. 8% for TPG Mortgage Investment Trust Inc. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — AOMR or MITT?
Angel Oak Mortgage, Inc.
(AOMR) is the more profitable company, earning 33. 2% net margin versus 10. 3% for TPG Mortgage Investment Trust Inc — meaning it keeps 33. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AOMR leads at 110. 8% versus 96. 9% for MITT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MITT leads at 94. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is AOMR or MITT more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Angel Oak Mortgage, Inc.
(AOMR) trades at 6. 8x forward P/E versus 7. 2x for TPG Mortgage Investment Trust Inc — 0. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MITT: 22. 1% to $9. 63.
08Which pays a better dividend — AOMR or MITT?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Angel Oak Mortgage, Inc. (AOMR) offers the highest yield at 14. 3%, versus 10. 0% for TPG Mortgage Investment Trust Inc (MITT).
09Is AOMR or MITT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Angel Oak Mortgage, Inc.
(AOMR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 67), 14. 3% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (AOMR: -18. 6%, MITT: -15. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between AOMR and MITT?
Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: AOMR is a small-cap high-growth stock; MITT is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.