Medical - Devices
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
AORT vs TMDX
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Medical - Devices
AORT vs TMDX — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Medical - Devices | Medical - Devices |
| Market Cap | $1.23B | $2.34B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $459M | $636M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $12M | $172M |
| Gross Margin | 63.8% | 59.1% |
| Operating Margin | 7.4% | 14.9% |
| Forward P/E | 75.3x | 31.5x |
| Total Debt | $292M | $470M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $65M | $488M |
AORT vs TMDX — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Artivion, Inc. (AORT) | 100 | 111.8 | +11.8% |
| TransMedics Group, … (TMDX) | 100 | 513.2 | +413.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: AORT vs TMDX
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
AORT is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 0.57
- Lower volatility, beta 0.57, Low D/E 65.2%, current ratio 2.99x
- Beta 0.57, current ratio 2.99x
TMDX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 37.1%, EPS growth 382.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 86.4%
- 203.2% 10Y total return vs AORT's 107.4%
- 37.1% revenue growth vs AORT's 13.6%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 37.1% revenue growth vs AORT's 13.6% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (31.5x vs 75.3x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 27.0% margin vs AORT's 2.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.57 vs TMDX's 1.40, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | -10.9% vs TMDX's -27.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 15.8% ROA vs AORT's 1.3%, ROIC 18.8% vs 3.2% |
AORT vs TMDX — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
AORT vs TMDX — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TMDX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TMDX and AORT operate at a comparable scale, with $636M and $459M in trailing revenue. TMDX is the more profitable business, keeping 27.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to AORT's 2.5%. On growth, TMDX holds the edge at +21.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $459M | $636M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $51M | $115M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $12M | $172M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $13M | $151M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +63.8% | +59.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +7.4% | +14.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +2.5% | +27.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +2.8% | +23.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +17.5% | +21.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +3.5% | -71.4% |
Valuation Metrics
TMDX leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 13.9x trailing earnings, TMDX trades at a 88% valuation discount to AORT's 121.0x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, TMDX's 17.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than AORT's 29.7x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.2B | $2.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.5B | $2.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 121.00x | 13.92x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 75.29x | 31.51x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 29.66x | 17.12x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.79x | 3.87x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.67x | 5.81x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 17.54x |
Profitability & Efficiency
TMDX leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TMDX delivers a 41.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $42 in annual profit, vs $3 for AORT. AORT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.65x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TMDX's 0.99x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TMDX scores 7/9 vs AORT's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +2.7% | +41.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.3% | +15.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +3.2% | +18.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +3.6% | +12.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.65x | 0.99x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $227M | -$19M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $65M | $488M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $292M | $470M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.52x | 33.15x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
AORT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TMDX five years ago would be worth $29,309 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,614 for AORT. Over the past 12 months, AORT leads with a -10.9% total return vs TMDX's -27.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AORT at 20.3% vs TMDX's -1.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -42.8% | -44.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -10.9% | -27.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +73.9% | -4.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -13.9% | +193.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +107.4% | +203.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +20.3% | -1.5% |
Risk & Volatility
AORT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
AORT is the less volatile stock with a 0.57 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TMDX's 1.40 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AORT currently trades 52.7% from its 52-week high vs TMDX's 43.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.57x | 1.40x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $48.25 | $156.00 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $19.16 | $67.69 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +52.7% | +43.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 45.5 | 21.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 477K | 1.2M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates AORT as "Buy" and TMDX as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 108.6% upside for AORT (target: $53) vs 83.4% for TMDX (target: $124).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $53.00 | $124.33 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 12 | 12 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 4 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.0% |
TMDX leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). AORT leads in 2 (Total Returns, Risk & Volatility).
AORT vs TMDX: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is AORT or TMDX a better buy right now?
For growth investors, TransMedics Group, Inc.
(TMDX) is the stronger pick with 37. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 13. 6% for Artivion, Inc. (AORT). TransMedics Group, Inc. (TMDX) offers the better valuation at 13. 9x trailing P/E (31. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Artivion, Inc. (AORT) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — AORT or TMDX?
On trailing P/E, TransMedics Group, Inc.
(TMDX) is the cheapest at 13. 9x versus Artivion, Inc. at 121. 0x. On forward P/E, TransMedics Group, Inc. is actually cheaper at 31. 5x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — AORT or TMDX?
Over the past 5 years, TransMedics Group, Inc.
(TMDX) delivered a total return of +193. 1%, compared to -13. 9% for Artivion, Inc. (AORT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TMDX returned +203. 2% versus AORT's +107. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — AORT or TMDX?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Artivion, Inc.
(AORT) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 57β versus TransMedics Group, Inc. 's 1. 40β — meaning TMDX is approximately 144% more volatile than AORT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Artivion, Inc. (AORT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 65% versus 99% for TransMedics Group, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — AORT or TMDX?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), TransMedics Group, Inc.
(TMDX) is pulling ahead at 37. 1% versus 13. 6% for Artivion, Inc. (AORT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: TransMedics Group, Inc. grew EPS 382. 2% year-over-year, compared to 165. 6% for Artivion, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, TMDX leads at 86. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — AORT or TMDX?
TransMedics Group, Inc.
(TMDX) is the more profitable company, earning 31. 4% net margin versus 2. 2% for Artivion, Inc. — meaning it keeps 31. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TMDX leads at 17. 9% versus 6. 1% for AORT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AORT leads at 61. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is AORT or TMDX more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, TransMedics Group, Inc.
(TMDX) trades at 31. 5x forward P/E versus 75. 3x for Artivion, Inc. — 43. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for AORT: 108. 6% to $53. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — AORT or TMDX?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is AORT or TMDX better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Artivion, Inc.
(AORT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 57), +107. 4% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (AORT: +107. 4%, TMDX: +203. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between AORT and TMDX?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: AORT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; TMDX is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.