Semiconductors
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
AOSL vs SMTC vs SLAB vs DIOD
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Semiconductors
Semiconductors
Semiconductors
AOSL vs SMTC vs SLAB vs DIOD — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Semiconductors | Semiconductors | Semiconductors | Semiconductors |
| Market Cap | $1.11B | $11.21B | $7.17B | $5.18B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $685M | $1.03B | $785M | $1.56B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-77M | $29M | $-65M | $86M |
| Gross Margin | 22.4% | 52.0% | 58.2% | 31.3% |
| Operating Margin | -6.4% | 12.3% | -9.0% | 3.5% |
| Forward P/E | — | 71.7x | 80.4x | 48.5x |
| Total Debt | $51M | $552M | $0.00 | $96M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $153M | $152M | $364M | $367M |
AOSL vs SMTC vs SLAB vs DIOD — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alpha and Omega Sem… (AOSL) | 100 | 355.9 | +255.9% |
| Semtech Corporation (SMTC) | 100 | 228.5 | +128.5% |
| Silicon Laboratorie… (SLAB) | 100 | 232.4 | +132.4% |
| Diodes Incorporated (DIOD) | 100 | 231.5 | +131.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: AOSL vs SMTC vs SLAB vs DIOD
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
AOSL lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
SMTC is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 460.9% 10Y total return vs DIOD's 490.7%
- +253.5% vs AOSL's +86.6%
SLAB is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and growth exposure is your priority.
- beta 1.25
- Rev growth 34.3%, EPS growth 66.6%, 3Y rev CAGR -8.5%
- Beta 1.25, current ratio 4.69x
- 34.3% revenue growth vs SMTC's 4.7%
DIOD carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 2.11, Low D/E 4.9%, current ratio 3.32x
- Lower P/E (48.5x vs 80.4x)
- 5.5% margin vs AOSL's -11.2%
- 3.5% ROA vs AOSL's -7.6%, ROIC 1.6% vs -2.8%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 34.3% revenue growth vs SMTC's 4.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (48.5x vs 80.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 5.5% margin vs AOSL's -11.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.25 vs AOSL's 2.81 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +253.5% vs AOSL's +86.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 3.5% ROA vs AOSL's -7.6%, ROIC 1.6% vs -2.8% |
AOSL vs SMTC vs SLAB vs DIOD — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
AOSL vs SMTC vs SLAB vs DIOD — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
DIOD leads in 1 of 6 categories
SMTC leads 1 • SLAB leads 1 • AOSL leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — SMTC and SLAB and DIOD each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
DIOD is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.6B annually — 2.3x AOSL's $685M. DIOD is the more profitable business, keeping 5.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to AOSL's -11.2%. On growth, SLAB holds the edge at +25.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $685M | $1.0B | $785M | $1.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$28M | $173M | -$32M | $162M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$77M | $29M | -$65M | $86M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$23M | $143M | $66M | $129M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +22.4% | +52.0% | +58.2% | +31.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -6.4% | +12.3% | -9.0% | +3.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -11.2% | +2.8% | -8.3% | +5.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -3.4% | +13.9% | +8.4% | +8.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -0.5% | +12.7% | +25.2% | +22.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -24.3% | +67.4% | +88.8% | +4.3% |
Valuation Metrics
DIOD leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, DIOD's 27.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than SMTC's 104.6x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.1B | $11.2B | $7.2B | $5.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.0B | $11.6B | $6.8B | $4.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -11.35x | -53.76x | -109.92x | 78.73x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 71.68x | 80.41x | 48.48x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 29.80x | 104.59x | — | 27.39x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.60x | 12.33x | 9.14x | 3.50x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.34x | 16.04x | 6.51x | 2.70x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 256.13x | 109.03x | 37.77x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — SMTC and DIOD each lead in 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SMTC delivers a 5.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $5 in annual profit, vs $-9 for AOSL. DIOD carries lower financial leverage with a 0.05x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SMTC's 1.02x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SMTC scores 6/9 vs AOSL's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -9.4% | +5.1% | -5.9% | +4.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -7.6% | +2.0% | -5.1% | +3.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -2.8% | +4.9% | -6.9% | +1.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -3.0% | +5.4% | -6.3% | +1.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 6 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.06x | 1.02x | — | 0.05x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$102M | $400M | -$364M | -$272M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $153M | $152M | $364M | $367M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $51M | $552M | $0 | $96M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -202.36x | 2.45x | -58.63x | 54.72x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
SMTC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SMTC five years ago would be worth $18,981 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $12,324 for AOSL. Over the past 12 months, SMTC leads with a +253.5% total return vs AOSL's +86.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SMTC at 86.4% vs DIOD's 10.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +81.2% | +61.4% | +65.0% | +118.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +86.6% | +253.5% | +100.3% | +187.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +56.0% | +547.3% | +59.0% | +33.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +23.2% | +89.8% | +61.0% | +51.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +172.1% | +460.9% | +375.0% | +490.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +16.0% | +86.4% | +16.7% | +10.1% |
Risk & Volatility
SLAB leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SLAB is the less volatile stock with a 1.25 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AOSL's 2.81 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SLAB currently trades 99.5% from its 52-week high vs AOSL's 74.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.81x | 2.73x | 1.25x | 2.11x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $49.97 | $127.19 | $218.66 | $117.80 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $17.01 | $33.06 | $106.01 | $37.97 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +74.9% | +95.5% | +99.5% | +95.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 78.2 | 69.3 | 66.1 | 80.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 676K | 2.4M | 465K | 533K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: AOSL as "Buy", SMTC as "Buy", SLAB as "Buy", DIOD as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply -2.8% upside for SLAB (target: $212) vs -34.3% for DIOD (target: $74).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $36.00 | $87.44 | $211.60 | $74.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 11 | 32 | 37 | 13 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.7% |
DIOD leads in 1 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics). SMTC leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
AOSL vs SMTC vs SLAB vs DIOD: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is AOSL or SMTC or SLAB or DIOD a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Silicon Laboratories Inc.
(SLAB) is the stronger pick with 34. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 4. 7% for Semtech Corporation (SMTC). Diodes Incorporated (DIOD) offers the better valuation at 78. 7x trailing P/E (48. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Alpha and Omega Semiconductor Limited (AOSL) a "Buy" — based on 11 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — AOSL or SMTC or SLAB or DIOD?
On forward P/E, Diodes Incorporated is actually cheaper at 48.
5x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — AOSL or SMTC or SLAB or DIOD?
Over the past 5 years, Semtech Corporation (SMTC) delivered a total return of +89.
8%, compared to +23. 2% for Alpha and Omega Semiconductor Limited (AOSL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: DIOD returned +490. 7% versus AOSL's +172. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — AOSL or SMTC or SLAB or DIOD?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Silicon Laboratories Inc.
(SLAB) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 25β versus Alpha and Omega Semiconductor Limited's 2. 81β — meaning AOSL is approximately 125% more volatile than SLAB relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Diodes Incorporated (DIOD) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 5% versus 102% for Semtech Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — AOSL or SMTC or SLAB or DIOD?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Silicon Laboratories Inc.
(SLAB) is pulling ahead at 34. 3% versus 4. 7% for Semtech Corporation (SMTC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Semtech Corporation grew EPS 86. 7% year-over-year, compared to -746. 2% for Alpha and Omega Semiconductor Limited. Over a 3-year CAGR, SMTC leads at 7. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — AOSL or SMTC or SLAB or DIOD?
Diodes Incorporated (DIOD) is the more profitable company, earning 4.
5% net margin versus -17. 8% for Semtech Corporation — meaning it keeps 4. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SMTC leads at 6. 8% versus -9. 0% for SLAB. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SLAB leads at 58. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is AOSL or SMTC or SLAB or DIOD more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Diodes Incorporated (DIOD) trades at 48.
5x forward P/E versus 80. 4x for Silicon Laboratories Inc. — 31. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SLAB: -2. 8% to $211. 60.
08Which pays a better dividend — AOSL or SMTC or SLAB or DIOD?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is AOSL or SMTC or SLAB or DIOD better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Silicon Laboratories Inc.
(SLAB) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 25), +375. 0% 10Y return). Alpha and Omega Semiconductor Limited (AOSL) carries a higher beta of 2. 81 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (SLAB: +375. 0%, AOSL: +172. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between AOSL and SMTC and SLAB and DIOD?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: AOSL is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SMTC is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; SLAB is a small-cap high-growth stock; DIOD is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.