Asset Management
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
APAM vs VRTS vs DHIL vs CNNE vs AMG
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Asset Management
Asset Management
Restaurants
Asset Management
APAM vs VRTS vs DHIL vs CNNE vs AMG — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Asset Management | Asset Management | Asset Management | Restaurants | Asset Management |
| Market Cap | $2.65B | $959M | $473M | $1.30B | $8.10B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.20B | $831M | $158M | $424M | $2.45B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $290M | $138M | $49M | $-513M | $717M |
| Gross Margin | 45.7% | 74.9% | 96.0% | 0.0% | 86.0% |
| Operating Margin | 33.4% | 17.4% | 38.4% | -28.2% | 31.8% |
| Forward P/E | 9.8x | 5.6x | 9.5x | — | 9.2x |
| Total Debt | $410M | $2.84B | $6.40B | $332M | $2.69B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $256M | $477M | $42M | $182M | $586M |
APAM vs VRTS vs DHIL vs CNNE vs AMG — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Artisan Partners As… (APAM) | 100 | 129.7 | +29.7% |
| Virtus Investment P… (VRTS) | 100 | 154.0 | +54.0% |
| Diamond Hill Invest… (DHIL) | 100 | 164.0 | +64.0% |
| Cannae Holdings, In… (CNNE) | 100 | 37.1 | -62.9% |
| Affiliated Managers… (AMG) | 100 | 455.8 | +355.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: APAM vs VRTS vs DHIL vs CNNE vs AMG
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
APAM ranks third and is worth considering specifically for dividends.
- 10.4% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs VRTS's 6.5%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
VRTS is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 7 yrs, beta 1.14, yield 6.5%
- 170.7% 10Y total return vs AMG's 89.1%
- NIM 0.9% vs APAM's 0.2%
- Better valuation composite
DHIL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.57, current ratio 75115.85x
- Beta 0.57, yield 5.7%, current ratio 75115.85x
- 30.9% margin vs CNNE's -121.2%
- Beta 0.57 vs APAM's 1.17
Among these 5 stocks, CNNE doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
AMG is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and valuation efficiency is your priority.
- Rev growth 19.8%, EPS growth 50.3%
- PEG 0.23 vs APAM's 2.76
- 19.8% NII/revenue growth vs VRTS's -8.0%
- +75.9% vs CNNE's -20.4%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 19.8% NII/revenue growth vs VRTS's -8.0% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 30.9% margin vs CNNE's -121.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.57 vs APAM's 1.17 | |
| Dividends | 10.4% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs VRTS's 6.5%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +75.9% vs CNNE's -20.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 19.5% ROA vs CNNE's -38.9%, ROIC 1.3% vs -5.7% |
APAM vs VRTS vs DHIL vs CNNE vs AMG — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
APAM vs VRTS vs DHIL vs CNNE vs AMG — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
DHIL leads in 2 of 6 categories
APAM leads 1 • AMG leads 1 • VRTS leads 0 • CNNE leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
DHIL leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AMG is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.4B annually — 15.5x DHIL's $158M. DHIL is the more profitable business, keeping 30.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CNNE's -121.2%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.2B | $831M | $158M | $424M | $2.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $424M | $205M | $62M | $3M | $855M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $290M | $138M | $49M | -$513M | $717M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $172M | -$67M | $44.5B | -$35M | $978M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +45.7% | +74.9% | +96.0% | +0.0% | +86.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +33.4% | +17.4% | +38.4% | -28.2% | +31.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +24.3% | +16.7% | +30.9% | -121.2% | +29.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +14.3% | -8.9% | -57.4% | -8.3% | +41.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | -6.0% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +35.6% | +10.9% | +25.3% | -160.8% | +149.1% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — VRTS and CNNE and AMG each lead in 2 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 7.2x trailing earnings, VRTS trades at a 46% valuation discount to AMG's 13.4x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), AMG offers better value at 0.34x vs APAM's 2.61x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.7B | $959M | $473M | $1.3B | $8.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.8B | $3.3B | $6.8B | $1.4B | $10.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 9.28x | 7.17x | 9.77x | -1.51x | 13.35x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 9.82x | 5.60x | 9.48x | — | 9.16x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 2.61x | 0.48x | 1.18x | — | 0.34x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 6.86x | 16.25x | 110.39x | — | 10.77x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.21x | 1.15x | 3.00x | 3.06x | 3.31x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.15x | 0.96x | 2.70x | 0.78x | 2.27x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 15.47x | — | — | — | 8.06x |
Profitability & Efficiency
APAM leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
APAM delivers a 44.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $45 in annual profit, vs $-52 for CNNE. CNNE carries lower financial leverage with a 0.33x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to DHIL's 36.26x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AMG scores 8/9 vs CNNE's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +44.9% | +13.5% | +27.0% | -51.8% | +16.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +19.4% | +3.6% | +19.5% | -38.9% | +8.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +26.7% | +3.0% | +1.3% | -5.7% | +8.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +29.9% | +3.7% | +26.0% | -7.3% | +8.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.52x | 2.74x | 36.26x | 0.33x | 0.61x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $155M | $2.4B | $6.4B | $150M | $2.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $256M | $477M | $42M | $182M | $586M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $410M | $2.8B | $6.4B | $332M | $2.7B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 58.20x | 2.15x | — | -25.50x | 9.69x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
AMG leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in AMG five years ago would be worth $18,023 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,856 for CNNE. Over the past 12 months, AMG leads with a +75.9% total return vs CNNE's -20.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AMG at 29.0% vs CNNE's -6.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -5.4% | -8.9% | +2.8% | -12.1% | +5.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +3.6% | -4.3% | +35.1% | -20.4% | +75.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +45.9% | -0.1% | +20.7% | -18.9% | +114.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +1.5% | -34.2% | +28.1% | -61.4% | +80.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +127.8% | +170.7% | +54.5% | -20.0% | +89.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +13.4% | -0.0% | +6.5% | -6.8% | +29.0% |
Risk & Volatility
DHIL leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
DHIL is the less volatile stock with a 0.57 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than APAM's 1.17 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. DHIL currently trades 100.0% from its 52-week high vs CNNE's 62.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.17x | 1.14x | 0.57x | 0.98x | 1.14x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $48.50 | $215.06 | $175.03 | $21.96 | $334.78 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $34.99 | $121.61 | $114.11 | $10.46 | $170.27 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +77.5% | +66.6% | +100.0% | +62.2% | +90.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 45.6 | 50.2 | 70.5 | 62.1 | 55.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 755K | 100K | 24K | 683K | 352K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — APAM and VRTS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: APAM as "Hold", VRTS as "Hold", CNNE as "Buy", AMG as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 24.4% upside for CNNE (target: $17) vs 6.4% for APAM (target: $40). For income investors, APAM offers the higher dividend yield at 10.43% vs DHIL's 5.71%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | — | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $40.00 | $163.00 | — | $17.00 | $331.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 15 | 11 | — | 5 | 12 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +10.4% | +6.5% | +5.7% | — | +0.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | 7 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $3.92 | $9.32 | $9.98 | — | $0.03 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +6.3% | +3.6% | 0.0% | +8.7% |
DHIL leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Risk & Volatility). APAM leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 2 tied.
APAM vs VRTS vs DHIL vs CNNE vs AMG: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is APAM or VRTS or DHIL or CNNE or AMG a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Affiliated Managers Group, Inc.
(AMG) is the stronger pick with 19. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -8. 0% for Virtus Investment Partners, Inc. (VRTS). Virtus Investment Partners, Inc. (VRTS) offers the better valuation at 7. 2x trailing P/E (5. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Cannae Holdings, Inc. (CNNE) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — APAM or VRTS or DHIL or CNNE or AMG?
On trailing P/E, Virtus Investment Partners, Inc.
(VRTS) is the cheapest at 7. 2x versus Affiliated Managers Group, Inc. at 13. 4x. On forward P/E, Virtus Investment Partners, Inc. is actually cheaper at 5. 6x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Affiliated Managers Group, Inc. wins at 0. 23x versus Artisan Partners Asset Management Inc. 's 2. 76x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — APAM or VRTS or DHIL or CNNE or AMG?
Over the past 5 years, Affiliated Managers Group, Inc.
(AMG) delivered a total return of +80. 2%, compared to -61. 4% for Cannae Holdings, Inc. (CNNE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: VRTS returned +170. 7% versus CNNE's -20. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — APAM or VRTS or DHIL or CNNE or AMG?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc.
(DHIL) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 57β versus Artisan Partners Asset Management Inc. 's 1. 17β — meaning APAM is approximately 104% more volatile than DHIL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Cannae Holdings, Inc. (CNNE) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 33% versus 36% for Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — APAM or VRTS or DHIL or CNNE or AMG?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Affiliated Managers Group, Inc.
(AMG) is pulling ahead at 19. 8% versus -8. 0% for Virtus Investment Partners, Inc. (VRTS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Affiliated Managers Group, Inc. grew EPS 50. 3% year-over-year, compared to -92. 0% for Cannae Holdings, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — APAM or VRTS or DHIL or CNNE or AMG?
Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc.
(DHIL) is the more profitable company, earning 30. 9% net margin versus -99. 2% for Cannae Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 30. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: DHIL leads at 38. 4% versus -28. 2% for CNNE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — DHIL leads at 96. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is APAM or VRTS or DHIL or CNNE or AMG more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Affiliated Managers Group, Inc. (AMG) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 23x versus Artisan Partners Asset Management Inc. 's 2. 76x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Virtus Investment Partners, Inc. (VRTS) trades at 5. 6x forward P/E versus 9. 8x for Artisan Partners Asset Management Inc. — 4. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CNNE: 24. 4% to $17. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — APAM or VRTS or DHIL or CNNE or AMG?
In this comparison, APAM (10.
4% yield), VRTS (6. 5% yield), DHIL (5. 7% yield) pay a dividend. CNNE, AMG do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is APAM or VRTS or DHIL or CNNE or AMG better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc.
(DHIL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 57), 5. 7% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (DHIL: +54. 5%, AMG: +89. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between APAM and VRTS and DHIL and CNNE and AMG?
These companies operate in different sectors (APAM (Financial Services) and VRTS (Financial Services) and DHIL (Financial Services) and CNNE (Consumer Cyclical) and AMG (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: APAM is a small-cap deep-value stock; VRTS is a small-cap deep-value stock; DHIL is a small-cap deep-value stock; CNNE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; AMG is a small-cap high-growth stock. APAM, VRTS, DHIL pay a dividend while CNNE, AMG do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.