Engineering & Construction
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
APG vs WLDN vs TTEK vs MYRG vs PRIM vs KO vs JPM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Engineering & Construction
Engineering & Construction
Engineering & Construction
Engineering & Construction
Beverages - Non-Alcoholic
Banks - Diversified
APG vs WLDN vs TTEK vs MYRG vs PRIM vs KO vs JPM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Engineering & Construction | Engineering & Construction | Engineering & Construction | Engineering & Construction | Engineering & Construction | Beverages - Non-Alcoholic | Banks - Diversified |
| Market Cap | $18.31B | $1.46B | $7.41B | $6.94B | $5.35B | $355.61B | $896.00B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $8.17B | $684M | $4.91B | $3.82B | $7.49B | $49.28B | $280.33B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $324M | $56M | $440M | $142M | $248M | $13.70B | $57.05B |
| Gross Margin | 29.1% | 38.2% | 19.5% | 11.9% | 10.4% | 61.7% | 60.0% |
| Operating Margin | 6.7% | 6.5% | 12.4% | 5.1% | 4.9% | 29.3% | 25.9% |
| Forward P/E | 25.0x | 23.4x | 18.4x | 39.0x | 20.4x | 25.3x | 14.4x |
| Total Debt | $3.29B | $69M | $987M | $104M | $1.28B | $45.49B | $942.38B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $912M | $66M | $167M | $150M | $541M | $10.27B | $343.34B |
APG vs WLDN vs TTEK vs MYRG vs PRIM vs KO vs JPM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| APi Group Corporati… (APG) | 100 | 522.7 | +422.7% |
| Willdan Group, Inc. (WLDN) | 100 | 385.0 | +285.0% |
| Tetra Tech, Inc. (TTEK) | 100 | 179.7 | +79.7% |
| MYR Group Inc. (MYRG) | 100 | 1396.8 | +1296.8% |
| Primoris Services C… (PRIM) | 100 | 555.5 | +455.5% |
| The Coca-Cola Compa… (KO) | 100 | 184.9 | +84.9% |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) | 100 | 341.0 | +241.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: APG vs WLDN vs TTEK vs MYRG vs PRIM vs KO vs JPM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
APG doesn't hold a clear category lead here; it's more of a secondary option in this specific comparison.
WLDN is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 20.5%, EPS growth 120.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 16.7%
- 20.5% revenue growth vs KO's 1.9%
TTEK ranks third and is worth considering specifically for sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.49, Low D/E 55.5%, current ratio 1.18x
- Beta 0.49, yield 0.9%, current ratio 1.18x
- Beta 0.49 vs WLDN's 1.99
MYRG is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 17.8% 10Y total return vs WLDN's 8.0%
- +169.5% vs TTEK's -20.8%
In this particular matchup, PRIM is outpaced on most metrics by others in the set.
KO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for quality and dividends.
- 27.8% margin vs PRIM's 3.3%
- 2.5% yield, 56-year raise streak, vs TTEK's 0.9%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
- 13.1% ROA vs JPM's 1.3%, ROIC 15.8% vs 4.5%
JPM is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and valuation efficiency.
- Dividend streak 15 yrs, beta 0.94, yield 1.9%
- PEG 0.81 vs MYRG's 2.34
- Lower P/E (14.4x vs 25.3x), PEG 0.81 vs 2.26
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 20.5% revenue growth vs KO's 1.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (14.4x vs 25.3x), PEG 0.81 vs 2.26 | |
| Quality / Margins | 27.8% margin vs PRIM's 3.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.49 vs WLDN's 1.99 | |
| Dividends | 2.5% yield, 56-year raise streak, vs TTEK's 0.9%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +169.5% vs TTEK's -20.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 13.1% ROA vs JPM's 1.3%, ROIC 15.8% vs 4.5% |
APG vs WLDN vs TTEK vs MYRG vs PRIM vs KO vs JPM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
APG vs WLDN vs TTEK vs MYRG vs PRIM vs KO vs JPM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 7 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
KO leads in 3 of 6 categories
MYRG leads 2 • JPM leads 1 • APG leads 0 • WLDN leads 0 • TTEK leads 0 • PRIM leads 0
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JPM is the larger business by revenue, generating $280.3B annually — 409.7x WLDN's $684M. KO is the more profitable business, keeping 27.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PRIM's 3.3%. On growth, MYRG holds the edge at +20.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $8.2B | $684M | $4.9B | $3.8B | $7.5B | $49.3B | $280.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $876M | $64M | $666M | $261M | $437M | $15.5B | $81.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $324M | $56M | $440M | $142M | $248M | $13.7B | $57.0B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $680M | $43M | $669M | $231M | $165M | $12.6B | $100.9B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +29.1% | +38.2% | +19.5% | +11.9% | +10.4% | +61.7% | +60.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +6.7% | +6.5% | +12.4% | +5.1% | +4.9% | +29.3% | +25.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +4.0% | +8.2% | +9.0% | +3.7% | +3.3% | +27.8% | +20.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +8.3% | +6.3% | +13.6% | +6.0% | +2.2% | +25.5% | +36.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +15.3% | +1.8% | +10.6% | +20.0% | -5.4% | +12.1% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +61.5% | +71.9% | +16.8% | +106.2% | -60.5% | +18.2% | +16.0% |
Valuation Metrics
JPM leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 16.0x trailing earnings, JPM trades at a 73% valuation discount to MYRG's 59.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), JPM offers better value at 0.90x vs TTEK's 3.77x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $18.3B | $1.5B | $7.4B | $6.9B | $5.3B | $355.6B | $896.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $20.7B | $1.5B | $8.2B | $6.9B | $6.1B | $390.8B | $1.50T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -61.36x | 27.59x | 30.57x | 59.19x | 19.65x | 27.18x | 16.00x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 24.96x | 23.36x | 18.40x | 38.99x | 20.35x | 25.27x | 14.40x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 3.77x | 3.55x | 1.07x | 2.43x | 0.90x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 23.48x | 23.21x | 12.39x | 30.09x | 12.03x | 26.39x | 18.36x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.31x | 2.14x | 1.36x | 1.90x | 0.71x | 7.42x | 3.20x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 5.17x | 4.76x | 4.27x | 10.62x | 3.22x | 10.40x | 2.47x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 27.62x | 20.58x | 16.89x | 29.89x | 15.71x | 67.15x | 8.88x |
Profitability & Efficiency
MYRG leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
KO delivers a 41.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $41 in annual profit, vs $10 for APG. MYRG carries lower financial leverage with a 0.16x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JPM's 2.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), APG scores 8/9 vs JPM's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +9.7% | +19.4% | +24.4% | +22.1% | +15.2% | +41.1% | +15.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +3.7% | +11.0% | +10.2% | +8.7% | +5.6% | +13.1% | +1.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +7.4% | +11.5% | +17.4% | +18.3% | +13.6% | +15.8% | +4.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +8.5% | +12.4% | +20.6% | +19.4% | +16.3% | +17.3% | +8.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 7 | 7 | 8 | 5 | 7 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.96x | 0.23x | 0.55x | 0.16x | 0.76x | 1.33x | 2.60x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $2.4B | $3M | $820M | -$47M | $735M | $35.2B | $599.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $912M | $66M | $167M | $150M | $541M | $10.3B | $343.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $3.3B | $69M | $987M | $104M | $1.3B | $45.5B | $942.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 6.08x | 14.80x | 19.86x | 39.49x | 21.02x | 10.70x | 0.74x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MYRG leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MYRG five years ago would be worth $49,294 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $11,941 for TTEK. Over the past 12 months, MYRG leads with a +169.5% total return vs TTEK's -20.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors WLDN at 72.0% vs TTEK's -2.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +8.6% | -9.7% | -15.1% | +96.6% | -24.4% | +20.3% | -0.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +31.7% | +70.9% | -20.8% | +169.5% | +34.3% | +17.2% | +21.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +152.5% | +409.0% | -7.0% | +229.6% | +237.1% | +47.0% | +138.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +187.4% | +140.5% | +19.4% | +392.9% | +216.5% | +65.6% | +118.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +511.0% | +798.3% | +396.4% | +1781.5% | +415.0% | +121.1% | +465.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +36.2% | +72.0% | -2.4% | +48.8% | +49.9% | +13.7% | +33.6% |
Risk & Volatility
KO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KO is the less volatile stock with a -0.20 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than WLDN's 1.99 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. KO currently trades 98.3% from its 52-week high vs PRIM's 48.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.26x | 1.99x | 0.49x | 1.79x | 1.60x | -0.20x | 0.94x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $49.99 | $137.00 | $43.14 | $484.71 | $205.50 | $84.04 | $337.25 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $31.75 | $55.00 | $25.81 | $159.61 | $71.97 | $65.35 | $262.71 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +84.7% | +70.3% | +65.9% | +92.0% | +48.0% | +98.3% | +95.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 49.6 | 62.6 | 46.5 | 48.3 | 32.1 | 60.6 | 59.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.5M | 388K | 3.2M | 274K | 1.8M | 12.7M | 7.0M |
Analyst Outlook
KO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: APG as "Buy", WLDN as "Buy", TTEK as "Hold", MYRG as "Hold", PRIM as "Buy", KO as "Buy", JPM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 55.3% upside for PRIM (target: $153) vs -7.4% for MYRG (target: $413). For income investors, KO offers the higher dividend yield at 2.46% vs PRIM's 0.32%.
| Metric | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Hold | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $52.50 | $117.50 | $35.00 | $412.67 | $153.25 | $86.13 | $339.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 8 | 7 | 26 | 21 | 24 | 48 | 61 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +0.9% | — | +0.3% | +2.5% | +1.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 | 12 | 4 | 2 | 56 | 15 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $0.24 | — | $0.32 | $2.04 | $5.95 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.4% | 0.0% | +3.4% | +1.1% | +0.2% | +0.2% | +3.9% |
KO leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Risk & Volatility). MYRG leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns).
APG vs WLDN vs TTEK vs MYRG vs PRIM vs KO vs JPM: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is APG or WLDN or TTEK or MYRG or PRIM or KO or JPM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Willdan Group, Inc.
(WLDN) is the stronger pick with 20. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 9% for The Coca-Cola Company (KO). JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) offers the better valuation at 16. 0x trailing P/E (14. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate APi Group Corporation (APG) a "Buy" — based on 8 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — APG or WLDN or TTEK or MYRG or PRIM or KO or JPM?
On trailing P/E, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) is the cheapest at 16. 0x versus MYR Group Inc. at 59. 2x. On forward P/E, JPMorgan Chase & Co. is actually cheaper at 14. 4x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: JPMorgan Chase & Co. wins at 0. 81x versus MYR Group Inc. 's 2. 34x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — APG or WLDN or TTEK or MYRG or PRIM or KO or JPM?
Over the past 5 years, MYR Group Inc.
(MYRG) delivered a total return of +392. 9%, compared to +19. 4% for Tetra Tech, Inc. (TTEK). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MYRG returned +1781% versus KO's +121. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — APG or WLDN or TTEK or MYRG or PRIM or KO or JPM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
20β versus Willdan Group, Inc. 's 1. 99β — meaning WLDN is approximately -1094% more volatile than KO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, MYR Group Inc. (MYRG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 16% versus 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — APG or WLDN or TTEK or MYRG or PRIM or KO or JPM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Willdan Group, Inc.
(WLDN) is pulling ahead at 20. 5% versus 1. 9% for The Coca-Cola Company (KO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: MYR Group Inc. grew EPS 311. 5% year-over-year, compared to -24. 4% for Tetra Tech, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, TTEK leads at 24. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — APG or WLDN or TTEK or MYRG or PRIM or KO or JPM?
The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the more profitable company, earning 27.
3% net margin versus 3. 2% for MYR Group Inc. — meaning it keeps 27. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: KO leads at 28. 7% versus 4. 4% for MYRG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — KO leads at 61. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is APG or WLDN or TTEK or MYRG or PRIM or KO or JPM more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 81x versus MYR Group Inc. 's 2. 34x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) trades at 14. 4x forward P/E versus 39. 0x for MYR Group Inc. — 24. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PRIM: 55. 3% to $153. 25.
08Which pays a better dividend — APG or WLDN or TTEK or MYRG or PRIM or KO or JPM?
In this comparison, KO (2.
5% yield), JPM (1. 9% yield), TTEK (0. 9% yield), PRIM (0. 3% yield) pay a dividend. APG, WLDN, MYRG do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is APG or WLDN or TTEK or MYRG or PRIM or KO or JPM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
20), 2. 5% yield, +121. 1% 10Y return). Willdan Group, Inc. (WLDN) carries a higher beta of 1. 99 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (KO: +121. 1%, WLDN: +798. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between APG and WLDN and TTEK and MYRG and PRIM and KO and JPM?
These companies operate in different sectors (APG (Industrials) and WLDN (Industrials) and TTEK (Industrials) and MYRG (Industrials) and PRIM (Industrials) and KO (Consumer Defensive) and JPM (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: APG is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; WLDN is a small-cap high-growth stock; TTEK is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MYRG is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PRIM is a small-cap high-growth stock; KO is a large-cap quality compounder stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock. TTEK, KO, JPM pay a dividend while APG, WLDN, MYRG, PRIM do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.