APO vs TPG

For growth investors, TPG Inc.

(TPG) is the stronger pick with 77. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -20. 0% for Apollo Global Management, Inc. (APO). Apollo Global Management, Inc. (APO) offers the better valuation at 17. 8x trailing P/E (14. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Apollo Global Management, Inc. (APO) a "Buy" — based on 28 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Apollo Global Management, Inc.

(APO) is the cheapest at 17. 8x versus TPG Inc. at 37. 7x. On forward P/E, Apollo Global Management, Inc. is actually cheaper at 14. 7x.

Over the past 5 years, Apollo Global Management, Inc.

(APO) delivered a total return of +146. 1%, compared to +53. 9% for TPG Inc. (TPG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: APO returned +796. 0% versus TPG's +53. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Apollo Global Management, Inc.

(APO) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 43β versus TPG Inc. 's 1. 61β — meaning TPG is approximately 12% more volatile than APO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Apollo Global Management, Inc. (APO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 34% versus 42% for TPG Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), TPG Inc.

(TPG) is pulling ahead at 77. 9% versus -20. 0% for Apollo Global Management, Inc. (APO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: TPG Inc. grew EPS 1779% year-over-year, compared to -11. 5% for Apollo Global Management, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Apollo Global Management, Inc.

(APO) is the more profitable company, earning 16. 9% net margin versus 4. 0% for TPG Inc. — meaning it keeps 16. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: APO leads at 31. 8% versus 14. 7% for TPG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TPG leads at 96. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

On forward earnings alone, Apollo Global Management, Inc.

(APO) trades at 14. 7x forward P/E versus 16. 5x for TPG Inc. — 1. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TPG: 42. 5% to $65. 00.

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

TPG Inc. (TPG) offers the highest yield at 17. 6%, versus 1. 4% for Apollo Global Management, Inc. (APO).

For long-horizon retirement investors, Apollo Global Management, Inc.

(APO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (1. 4% yield, +796. 0% 10Y return). TPG Inc. (TPG) carries a higher beta of 1. 61 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (APO: +796. 0%, TPG: +53. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: APO is a mid-cap deep-value stock; TPG is a mid-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.