Asset Management - Global
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
APO vs TPG vs BX vs KKR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Asset Management
Asset Management
Asset Management
APO vs TPG vs BX vs KKR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Asset Management - Global | Asset Management | Asset Management | Asset Management |
| Market Cap | $74.68B | $17.26B | $97.70B | $89.86B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $30.30B | $4.67B | $13.83B | $19.26B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $4.48B | $18M | $3.02B | $2.37B |
| Gross Margin | 88.5% | 96.9% | 86.0% | 41.8% |
| Operating Margin | 34.4% | 14.7% | 51.9% | 2.4% |
| Forward P/E | 14.6x | 16.3x | 20.9x | 16.5x |
| Total Debt | $13.36B | $1.72B | $13.31B | $54.77B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $19.24B | $826M | $2.63B | $6M |
APO vs TPG vs BX vs KKR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jan 22 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apollo Global Manag… (APO) | 100 | 185.0 | +85.0% |
| TPG Inc. (TPG) | 100 | 134.1 | +34.1% |
| Blackstone Inc. (BX) | 100 | 94.5 | -5.5% |
| KKR & Co. Inc. (KKR) | 100 | 141.6 | +41.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: APO vs TPG vs BX vs KKR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
APO is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 1.43, yield 1.6%
- 7.7% 10Y total return vs KKR's 7.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.43, Low D/E 31.4%, current ratio 0.78x
- Lower P/E (14.6x vs 16.3x)
TPG carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and bank quality.
- Rev growth 77.9%, EPS growth 17.8%
- NIM 0.7% vs KKR's 0.0%
- 77.9% NII/revenue growth vs KKR's -11.0%
- 17.9% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs KKR's 0.8%
BX is the clearest fit if your priority is valuation efficiency and defensive.
- PEG 1.00 vs APO's 1.00
- Beta 1.53, yield 6.2%, current ratio 0.91x
- Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs TPG's 0.8% (lower = leaner)
- Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs TPG's 0.8%
KKR lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 77.9% NII/revenue growth vs KKR's -11.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (14.6x vs 16.3x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs TPG's 0.8% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.43 vs KKR's 1.70, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 17.9% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs KKR's 0.8% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +1.9% vs KKR's -10.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs TPG's 0.8% |
APO vs TPG vs BX vs KKR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
APO vs TPG vs BX vs KKR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
APO leads in 3 of 6 categories
BX leads 2 • TPG leads 0 • KKR leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BX leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
APO is the larger business by revenue, generating $30.3B annually — 6.5x TPG's $4.7B. BX is the more profitable business, keeping 21.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to TPG's 4.0%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $30.3B | $4.7B | $13.8B | $19.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $11.5B | $611M | $7.2B | $9.0B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $4.5B | $18M | $3.0B | $2.4B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $5.4B | $972M | $3.5B | $7.5B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +88.5% | +96.9% | +86.0% | +41.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +34.4% | +14.7% | +51.9% | +2.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +14.8% | +4.0% | +21.8% | +12.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +24.6% | +21.5% | +12.6% | +49.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +16.3% | — | +41.3% | -1.7% |
Valuation Metrics
APO leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 17.8x trailing earnings, APO trades at a 59% valuation discount to KKR's 43.1x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), APO offers better value at 0.24x vs BX's 1.54x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $74.7B | $17.3B | $97.7B | $89.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $68.8B | $18.2B | $108.4B | $144.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 17.84x | 37.21x | 32.14x | 43.07x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 14.62x | 16.26x | 20.89x | 16.50x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.24x | — | 1.54x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 6.00x | 22.07x | 15.02x | 20.30x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.46x | 3.70x | 7.07x | 4.67x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.85x | 1.66x | 4.45x | 1.18x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 10.02x | 17.20x | 55.99x | 9.44x |
Profitability & Efficiency
BX leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BX delivers a 14.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $14 in annual profit, vs $0 for TPG. APO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.31x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to KKR's 0.67x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TPG scores 8/9 vs APO's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +12.1% | +0.4% | +14.3% | +3.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.0% | +0.1% | +6.5% | +0.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +16.0% | +9.3% | +16.1% | +0.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +8.8% | +7.4% | +16.9% | +0.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 8 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.31x | 0.42x | 0.61x | 0.67x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$5.9B | $896M | $10.7B | $54.8B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $19.2B | $826M | $2.6B | $6M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $13.4B | $1.7B | $13.3B | $54.8B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 28.98x | 6.24x | 14.12x | 3.29x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
APO leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in APO five years ago would be worth $24,242 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $15,221 for TPG. Over the past 12 months, TPG leads with a +1.9% total return vs KKR's -10.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors APO at 29.8% vs BX's 19.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -11.3% | -30.6% | -19.8% | -21.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +1.7% | +1.9% | -3.2% | -10.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +118.6% | +84.0% | +68.9% | +108.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +142.4% | +52.2% | +64.8% | +80.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +768.9% | +52.2% | +487.1% | +711.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +29.8% | +22.5% | +19.1% | +27.8% |
Risk & Volatility
APO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
APO is the less volatile stock with a 1.43 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than KKR's 1.70 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. APO currently trades 82.4% from its 52-week high vs TPG's 64.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.43x | 1.61x | 1.53x | 1.70x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $157.28 | $70.38 | $190.09 | $153.87 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $99.56 | $36.95 | $101.73 | $82.67 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +82.4% | +64.0% | +65.6% | +65.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 66.7 | 61.7 | 51.8 | 55.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 5.2M | 3.3M | 7.2M | 6.6M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — TPG and KKR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: APO as "Buy", TPG as "Buy", BX as "Buy", KKR as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 44.4% upside for TPG (target: $65) vs 21.4% for APO (target: $157). For income investors, TPG offers the higher dividend yield at 17.87% vs KKR's 0.80%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $157.25 | $65.00 | $156.29 | $143.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 28 | 17 | 29 | 26 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.6% | +17.9% | +6.2% | +0.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 3 | 2 | 2 | 6 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $2.14 | $8.04 | $7.70 | $0.80 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.0% | 0.0% | +0.3% | +0.1% |
APO leads in 3 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). BX leads in 2 (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). 1 tied.
APO vs TPG vs BX vs KKR: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is APO or TPG or BX or KKR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, TPG Inc.
(TPG) is the stronger pick with 77. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -11. 0% for KKR & Co. Inc. (KKR). Apollo Global Management, Inc. (APO) offers the better valuation at 17. 8x trailing P/E (14. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Apollo Global Management, Inc. (APO) a "Buy" — based on 28 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — APO or TPG or BX or KKR?
On trailing P/E, Apollo Global Management, Inc.
(APO) is the cheapest at 17. 8x versus KKR & Co. Inc. at 43. 1x. On forward P/E, Apollo Global Management, Inc. is actually cheaper at 14. 6x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Blackstone Inc. wins at 1. 00x versus Apollo Global Management, Inc. 's 1. 00x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — APO or TPG or BX or KKR?
Over the past 5 years, Apollo Global Management, Inc.
(APO) delivered a total return of +142. 4%, compared to +52. 2% for TPG Inc. (TPG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: APO returned +768. 9% versus TPG's +52. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — APO or TPG or BX or KKR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Apollo Global Management, Inc.
(APO) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 43β versus KKR & Co. Inc. 's 1. 70β — meaning KKR is approximately 19% more volatile than APO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Apollo Global Management, Inc. (APO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 31% versus 67% for KKR & Co. Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — APO or TPG or BX or KKR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), TPG Inc.
(TPG) is pulling ahead at 77. 9% versus -11. 0% for KKR & Co. Inc. (KKR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: TPG Inc. grew EPS 1779% year-over-year, compared to -28. 7% for KKR & Co. Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — APO or TPG or BX or KKR?
Blackstone Inc.
(BX) is the more profitable company, earning 21. 8% net margin versus 4. 0% for TPG Inc. — meaning it keeps 21. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BX leads at 51. 9% versus 2. 4% for KKR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TPG leads at 96. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is APO or TPG or BX or KKR more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Blackstone Inc. (BX) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 00x versus Apollo Global Management, Inc. 's 1. 00x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Apollo Global Management, Inc. (APO) trades at 14. 6x forward P/E versus 20. 9x for Blackstone Inc. — 6. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TPG: 44. 4% to $65. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — APO or TPG or BX or KKR?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
TPG Inc. (TPG) offers the highest yield at 17. 9%, versus 0. 8% for KKR & Co. Inc. (KKR).
09Is APO or TPG or BX or KKR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Apollo Global Management, Inc.
(APO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (1. 6% yield, +768. 9% 10Y return). TPG Inc. (TPG) carries a higher beta of 1. 61 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (APO: +768. 9%, TPG: +52. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between APO and TPG and BX and KKR?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: APO is a mid-cap high-growth stock; TPG is a mid-cap high-growth stock; BX is a mid-cap high-growth stock; KKR is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.