Construction
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
APOG vs AWI vs AAON vs JELD vs GFF
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Construction
Construction
Construction
Conglomerates
APOG vs AWI vs AAON vs JELD vs GFF — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Construction | Construction | Construction | Construction | Conglomerates |
| Market Cap | $787M | $7.05B | $10.58B | $146M | $4.22B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.40B | $1.65B | $1.62B | $3.16B | $2.35B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $54M | $306M | $118M | $-508M | $35M |
| Gross Margin | 22.7% | 40.3% | 26.2% | 15.7% | 42.6% |
| Operating Margin | 6.7% | 27.5% | 10.4% | -8.6% | 8.3% |
| Forward P/E | 10.6x | 19.9x | 65.3x | — | 17.3x |
| Total Debt | $286M | $532M | $433M | $1.49B | $1.59B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $40M | $113M | $13K | $136M | $99M |
APOG vs AWI vs AAON vs JELD vs GFF — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apogee Enterprises,… (APOG) | 100 | 177.1 | +77.1% |
| Armstrong World Ind… (AWI) | 100 | 219.0 | +119.0% |
| AAON, Inc. (AAON) | 100 | 357.9 | +257.9% |
| JELD-WEN Holding, I… (JELD) | 100 | 12.4 | -87.6% |
| Griffon Corporation (GFF) | 100 | 580.8 | +480.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: APOG vs AWI vs AAON vs JELD vs GFF
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
APOG is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Dividend streak 14 yrs, beta 1.25, yield 2.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.25, Low D/E 56.0%, current ratio 1.65x
- PEG 0.32 vs AAON's 12.01
- Lower P/E (10.6x vs 17.3x), PEG 0.32 vs 0.97
AWI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for quality and stability.
- 18.6% margin vs JELD's -16.1%
- Beta 0.82 vs JELD's 2.74, lower leverage
- 16.0% ROA vs JELD's -22.8%, ROIC 24.9% vs -1.9%
AAON ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 20.1%, EPS growth -36.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 17.5%
- 6.1% 10Y total return vs GFF's 5.6%
- 20.1% revenue growth vs JELD's -14.9%
- +35.5% vs JELD's -58.2%
JELD lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
GFF is the clearest fit if your priority is defensive.
- Beta 1.36, yield 0.9%, current ratio 2.66x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 20.1% revenue growth vs JELD's -14.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (10.6x vs 17.3x), PEG 0.32 vs 0.97 | |
| Quality / Margins | 18.6% margin vs JELD's -16.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.82 vs JELD's 2.74, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 2.8% yield, 14-year raise streak, vs GFF's 0.9%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +35.5% vs JELD's -58.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 16.0% ROA vs JELD's -22.8%, ROIC 24.9% vs -1.9% |
APOG vs AWI vs AAON vs JELD vs GFF — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
APOG vs AWI vs AAON vs JELD vs GFF — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
AWI leads in 2 of 6 categories
APOG leads 1 • AAON leads 0 • JELD leads 0 • GFF leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AWI leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JELD is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.2B annually — 2.2x APOG's $1.4B. AWI is the more profitable business, keeping 18.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to JELD's -16.1%. On growth, AAON holds the edge at +54.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.4B | $1.6B | $1.6B | $3.2B | $2.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $57M | $603M | $228M | -$158M | $241M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $54M | $306M | $118M | -$508M | $35M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $95M | $247M | -$145M | -$126M | $294M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +22.7% | +40.3% | +26.2% | +15.7% | +42.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +6.7% | +27.5% | +10.4% | -8.6% | +8.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +3.9% | +18.6% | +7.3% | -16.1% | +1.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +6.8% | +15.0% | -9.0% | -4.0% | +12.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +1.6% | +7.1% | +54.3% | -6.9% | -31.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +6.1% | -1.9% | +37.1% | +59.8% | -65.3% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — APOG and JELD each lead in 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 14.5x trailing earnings, APOG trades at a 86% valuation discount to AAON's 100.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), APOG offers better value at 0.43x vs AAON's 18.43x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $787M | $7.0B | $10.6B | $146M | $4.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.0B | $7.5B | $11.0B | $1.5B | $5.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 14.52x | 23.32x | 100.19x | -0.23x | 83.18x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 10.64x | 19.87x | 65.28x | — | 17.30x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.43x | — | 18.43x | — | 4.67x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 21.95x | 17.23x | 48.81x | 20.79x | 21.23x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.56x | 4.35x | 7.34x | 0.05x | 1.68x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.53x | 7.99x | 12.00x | 1.53x | 57.22x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 8.27x | 28.63x | — | — | 13.91x |
Profitability & Efficiency
AWI leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
GFF delivers a 40.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $41 in annual profit, vs $-3 for JELD. AAON carries lower financial leverage with a 0.48x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to GFF's 21.52x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AWI scores 9/9 vs JELD's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +10.8% | +34.8% | +13.4% | -2.9% | +40.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +4.8% | +16.0% | +7.4% | -22.8% | +1.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +8.1% | +24.9% | +9.4% | -1.9% | +9.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +9.7% | +26.5% | +12.4% | -2.3% | +11.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 9 | 2 | 2 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.56x | 0.59x | 0.48x | 15.81x | 21.52x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $247M | $419M | $433M | $1.4B | $1.5B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $40M | $113M | $13,000 | $136M | $99M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $286M | $532M | $433M | $1.5B | $1.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 5.97x | 13.31x | 11.27x | -4.11x | 2.30x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — AAON and GFF each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in GFF five years ago would be worth $36,532 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $547 for JELD. Over the past 12 months, AAON leads with a +35.5% total return vs JELD's -58.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GFF at 46.7% vs JELD's -48.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -1.3% | -16.0% | +63.3% | -31.9% | +21.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -2.8% | +11.5% | +35.5% | -58.2% | +34.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -0.1% | +151.8% | +101.6% | -86.6% | +215.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +12.9% | +63.0% | +196.3% | -94.5% | +265.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +10.5% | +330.4% | +612.1% | -93.5% | +558.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -0.0% | +36.0% | +26.3% | -48.8% | +46.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — AWI and GFF each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
AWI is the less volatile stock with a 0.82 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than JELD's 2.74 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GFF currently trades 92.9% from its 52-week high vs JELD's 24.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.25x | 0.82x | 1.83x | 2.74x | 1.36x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $49.99 | $206.08 | $148.88 | $6.98 | $97.58 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $30.75 | $148.25 | $62.00 | $0.93 | $65.01 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +73.2% | +80.1% | +86.8% | +24.2% | +92.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 53.6 | 41.3 | 59.4 | 64.4 | 63.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 253K | 494K | 965K | 2.0M | 348K |
Analyst Outlook
APOG leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: APOG as "Hold", AWI as "Buy", AAON as "Buy", JELD as "Hold", GFF as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 92.7% upside for APOG (target: $71) vs -7.9% for AAON (target: $119). For income investors, APOG offers the higher dividend yield at 2.83% vs AAON's 0.30%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $70.50 | $197.50 | $119.00 | $2.78 | $111.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 6 | 26 | 5 | 27 | 7 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.8% | +0.8% | +0.3% | — | +0.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 14 | 8 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.04 | $1.27 | $0.39 | — | $0.85 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.9% | +1.8% | +0.3% | 0.0% | +4.3% |
AWI leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). APOG leads in 1 (Analyst Outlook). 3 tied.
APOG vs AWI vs AAON vs JELD vs GFF: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is APOG or AWI or AAON or JELD or GFF a better buy right now?
For growth investors, AAON, Inc.
(AAON) is the stronger pick with 20. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -14. 9% for JELD-WEN Holding, Inc. (JELD). Apogee Enterprises, Inc. (APOG) offers the better valuation at 14. 5x trailing P/E (10. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Armstrong World Industries, Inc. (AWI) a "Buy" — based on 26 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — APOG or AWI or AAON or JELD or GFF?
On trailing P/E, Apogee Enterprises, Inc.
(APOG) is the cheapest at 14. 5x versus AAON, Inc. at 100. 2x. On forward P/E, Apogee Enterprises, Inc. is actually cheaper at 10. 6x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Apogee Enterprises, Inc. wins at 0. 32x versus AAON, Inc. 's 12. 01x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — APOG or AWI or AAON or JELD or GFF?
Over the past 5 years, Griffon Corporation (GFF) delivered a total return of +265.
3%, compared to -94. 5% for JELD-WEN Holding, Inc. (JELD). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AAON returned +612. 1% versus JELD's -93. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — APOG or AWI or AAON or JELD or GFF?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Armstrong World Industries, Inc.
(AWI) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 82β versus JELD-WEN Holding, Inc. 's 2. 74β — meaning JELD is approximately 235% more volatile than AWI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, AAON, Inc. (AAON) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 48% versus 22% for Griffon Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — APOG or AWI or AAON or JELD or GFF?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), AAON, Inc.
(AAON) is pulling ahead at 20. 1% versus -14. 9% for JELD-WEN Holding, Inc. (JELD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Armstrong World Industries, Inc. grew EPS 17. 6% year-over-year, compared to -226. 6% for JELD-WEN Holding, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, AAON leads at 17. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — APOG or AWI or AAON or JELD or GFF?
Armstrong World Industries, Inc.
(AWI) is the more profitable company, earning 19. 0% net margin versus -19. 3% for JELD-WEN Holding, Inc. — meaning it keeps 19. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AWI leads at 26. 6% versus -1. 3% for JELD. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — GFF leads at 42. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is APOG or AWI or AAON or JELD or GFF more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Apogee Enterprises, Inc. (APOG) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 32x versus AAON, Inc. 's 12. 01x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Apogee Enterprises, Inc. (APOG) trades at 10. 6x forward P/E versus 65. 3x for AAON, Inc. — 54. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for APOG: 92. 7% to $70. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — APOG or AWI or AAON or JELD or GFF?
In this comparison, APOG (2.
8% yield), GFF (0. 9% yield), AWI (0. 8% yield), AAON (0. 3% yield) pay a dividend. JELD does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is APOG or AWI or AAON or JELD or GFF better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Armstrong World Industries, Inc.
(AWI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 82), 0. 8% yield, +330. 4% 10Y return). JELD-WEN Holding, Inc. (JELD) carries a higher beta of 2. 74 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (AWI: +330. 4%, JELD: -93. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between APOG and AWI and AAON and JELD and GFF?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: APOG is a small-cap deep-value stock; AWI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; AAON is a mid-cap high-growth stock; JELD is a small-cap quality compounder stock; GFF is a small-cap quality compounder stock. APOG, AWI, GFF pay a dividend while AAON, JELD do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.