Construction
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
APOG vs AWI vs TREX vs OC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Construction
Construction
Construction
APOG vs AWI vs TREX vs OC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Construction | Construction | Construction | Construction |
| Market Cap | $787M | $7.05B | $4.12B | $9.79B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.40B | $1.65B | $1.18B | $9.84B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $54M | $306M | $191M | $-533M |
| Gross Margin | 22.7% | 40.3% | 39.2% | 26.9% |
| Operating Margin | 6.7% | 27.5% | 22.1% | 5.9% |
| Forward P/E | 10.6x | 19.9x | 24.0x | 13.0x |
| Total Debt | $286M | $532M | $229M | $6.16B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $40M | $113M | $4M | $353M |
APOG vs AWI vs TREX vs OC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apogee Enterprises,… (APOG) | 100 | 177.1 | +77.1% |
| Armstrong World Ind… (AWI) | 100 | 219.0 | +119.0% |
| Trex Company, Inc. (TREX) | 100 | 65.2 | -34.8% |
| Owens Corning (OC) | 100 | 232.1 | +132.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: APOG vs AWI vs TREX vs OC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
APOG is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Dividend streak 14 yrs, beta 1.25, yield 2.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.25, Low D/E 56.0%, current ratio 1.65x
- PEG 0.32 vs TREX's 7.16
- Beta 1.25, yield 2.8%, current ratio 1.65x
AWI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 12.1%, EPS growth 17.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 9.5%
- 330.4% 10Y total return vs OC's 184.8%
- 12.1% revenue growth vs OC's -7.9%
- 18.6% margin vs OC's -5.4%
TREX plays a supporting role in this comparison — it may shine differently against other peers.
OC lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 12.1% revenue growth vs OC's -7.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (10.6x vs 13.0x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 18.6% margin vs OC's -5.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.82 vs TREX's 1.47 | |
| Dividends | 2.8% yield, 14-year raise streak, vs OC's 2.3%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +11.5% vs TREX's -30.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 16.0% ROA vs OC's -3.9%, ROIC 24.9% vs 12.9% |
APOG vs AWI vs TREX vs OC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
APOG vs AWI vs TREX vs OC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
AWI leads in 4 of 6 categories
APOG leads 2 • TREX leads 0 • OC leads 0
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AWI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
OC is the larger business by revenue, generating $9.8B annually — 8.4x TREX's $1.2B. AWI is the more profitable business, keeping 18.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to OC's -5.4%. On growth, AWI holds the edge at +7.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.4B | $1.6B | $1.2B | $9.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $57M | $603M | $309M | $1.0B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $54M | $306M | $191M | -$533M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $95M | $247M | $263M | $713M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +22.7% | +40.3% | +39.2% | +26.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +6.7% | +27.5% | +22.1% | +5.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +3.9% | +18.6% | +16.3% | -5.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +6.8% | +15.0% | +22.3% | +7.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +1.6% | +7.1% | +1.0% | -10.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +6.1% | -1.9% | +3.6% | -21.3% |
Valuation Metrics
APOG leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 14.5x trailing earnings, APOG trades at a 38% valuation discount to AWI's 23.3x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), APOG offers better value at 0.43x vs TREX's 6.58x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $787M | $7.0B | $4.1B | $9.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.0B | $7.5B | $4.3B | $15.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 14.52x | 23.32x | 22.00x | -19.46x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 10.64x | 19.87x | 23.95x | 13.01x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.43x | — | 6.58x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 21.95x | 17.23x | 13.53x | 6.68x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.56x | 4.35x | 3.51x | 0.97x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.53x | 7.99x | 4.05x | 2.61x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 8.27x | 28.63x | 30.60x | 10.18x |
Profitability & Efficiency
AWI leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
AWI delivers a 34.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $35 in annual profit, vs $-12 for OC. TREX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.22x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to OC's 1.58x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AWI scores 9/9 vs OC's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +10.8% | +34.8% | +18.8% | -12.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +4.8% | +16.0% | +12.3% | -3.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +8.1% | +24.9% | +16.4% | +12.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +9.7% | +26.5% | +23.2% | +15.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 9 | 6 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.56x | 0.59x | 0.22x | 1.58x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $247M | $419M | $225M | $5.8B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $40M | $113M | $4M | $353M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $286M | $532M | $229M | $6.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 5.97x | 13.31x | — | -0.18x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
AWI leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in AWI five years ago would be worth $16,301 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,599 for TREX. Over the past 12 months, AWI leads with a +11.5% total return vs TREX's -30.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AWI at 36.0% vs TREX's -11.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -1.3% | -16.0% | +9.3% | +8.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -2.8% | +11.5% | -30.8% | -4.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -0.1% | +151.8% | -30.4% | +22.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +12.9% | +63.0% | -64.0% | +24.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +10.5% | +330.4% | +239.9% | +184.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -0.0% | +36.0% | -11.4% | +6.9% |
Risk & Volatility
AWI leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
AWI is the less volatile stock with a 0.82 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TREX's 1.47 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AWI currently trades 80.1% from its 52-week high vs TREX's 56.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.25x | 0.82x | 1.47x | 1.41x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $49.99 | $206.08 | $68.78 | $159.42 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $30.75 | $148.25 | $29.77 | $97.53 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +73.2% | +80.1% | +56.9% | +76.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 53.6 | 41.3 | 51.3 | 56.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 253K | 494K | 1.7M | 1.3M |
Analyst Outlook
APOG leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: APOG as "Hold", AWI as "Buy", TREX as "Hold", OC as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 92.7% upside for APOG (target: $71) vs 13.6% for TREX (target: $45). For income investors, APOG offers the higher dividend yield at 2.83% vs AWI's 0.77%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $70.50 | $197.50 | $44.50 | $141.20 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 6 | 26 | 31 | 43 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.8% | +0.8% | — | +2.3% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 14 | 8 | 2 | 12 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.04 | $1.27 | — | $2.78 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.9% | +1.8% | +1.3% | +8.3% |
AWI leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). APOG leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook).
APOG vs AWI vs TREX vs OC: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is APOG or AWI or TREX or OC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Armstrong World Industries, Inc.
(AWI) is the stronger pick with 12. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -7. 9% for Owens Corning (OC). Apogee Enterprises, Inc. (APOG) offers the better valuation at 14. 5x trailing P/E (10. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Armstrong World Industries, Inc. (AWI) a "Buy" — based on 26 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — APOG or AWI or TREX or OC?
On trailing P/E, Apogee Enterprises, Inc.
(APOG) is the cheapest at 14. 5x versus Armstrong World Industries, Inc. at 23. 3x. On forward P/E, Apogee Enterprises, Inc. is actually cheaper at 10. 6x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Apogee Enterprises, Inc. wins at 0. 32x versus Trex Company, Inc. 's 7. 16x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — APOG or AWI or TREX or OC?
Over the past 5 years, Armstrong World Industries, Inc.
(AWI) delivered a total return of +63. 0%, compared to -64. 0% for Trex Company, Inc. (TREX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AWI returned +330. 4% versus APOG's +10. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — APOG or AWI or TREX or OC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Armstrong World Industries, Inc.
(AWI) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 82β versus Trex Company, Inc. 's 1. 47β — meaning TREX is approximately 80% more volatile than AWI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Trex Company, Inc. (TREX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 22% versus 158% for Owens Corning — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — APOG or AWI or TREX or OC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Armstrong World Industries, Inc.
(AWI) is pulling ahead at 12. 1% versus -7. 9% for Owens Corning (OC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Armstrong World Industries, Inc. grew EPS 17. 6% year-over-year, compared to -185. 1% for Owens Corning. Over a 3-year CAGR, AWI leads at 9. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — APOG or AWI or TREX or OC?
Armstrong World Industries, Inc.
(AWI) is the more profitable company, earning 19. 0% net margin versus -5. 2% for Owens Corning — meaning it keeps 19. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AWI leads at 26. 6% versus 6. 0% for APOG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AWI leads at 40. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is APOG or AWI or TREX or OC more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Apogee Enterprises, Inc. (APOG) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 32x versus Trex Company, Inc. 's 7. 16x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Apogee Enterprises, Inc. (APOG) trades at 10. 6x forward P/E versus 24. 0x for Trex Company, Inc. — 13. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for APOG: 92. 7% to $70. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — APOG or AWI or TREX or OC?
In this comparison, APOG (2.
8% yield), OC (2. 3% yield), AWI (0. 8% yield) pay a dividend. TREX does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is APOG or AWI or TREX or OC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Armstrong World Industries, Inc.
(AWI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 82), 0. 8% yield, +330. 4% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (AWI: +330. 4%, TREX: +239. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between APOG and AWI and TREX and OC?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: APOG is a small-cap deep-value stock; AWI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; TREX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; OC is a small-cap quality compounder stock. APOG, AWI, OC pay a dividend while TREX does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.