Agricultural Farm Products
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
AQB vs WMT vs SFM vs SYY
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Specialty Retail
Grocery Stores
Food Distribution
AQB vs WMT vs SFM vs SYY — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Agricultural Farm Products | Specialty Retail | Grocery Stores | Food Distribution |
| Market Cap | $4M | $1.04T | $7.62B | $34.91B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $703.06B | $8.90B | $83.57B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-1.22B | $22.91B | $507M | $1.74B |
| Gross Margin | — | 24.9% | 37.0% | 18.5% |
| Operating Margin | — | 4.1% | 7.6% | 3.6% |
| Forward P/E | — | 44.8x | 14.9x | 15.8x |
| Total Debt | $3M | $67.09B | $1.94B | $14.49B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $501K | $10.73B | $257M | $1.07B |
AQB vs WMT vs SFM vs SYY — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| AquaBounty Technolo… (AQB) | 100 | 1.7 | -98.3% |
| Walmart Inc. (WMT) | 100 | 315.3 | +215.3% |
| Sprouts Farmers Mar… (SFM) | 100 | 329.6 | +229.6% |
| Sysco Corporation (SYY) | 100 | 131.3 | +31.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: AQB vs WMT vs SFM vs SYY
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
AQB is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 100.0%, EPS growth 87.7%
- 100.0% revenue growth vs SYY's 3.2%
WMT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Dividend streak 37 yrs, beta 0.12, yield 0.7%
- 499.5% 10Y total return vs SFM's 203.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.12, Low D/E 67.2%, current ratio 0.79x
- Beta 0.12 vs AQB's 1.00
SFM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for value and quality.
- Lower P/E (14.9x vs 44.8x), PEG 0.88 vs 4.07
- 5.7% margin vs AQB's -2.0%
- 12.5% ROA vs AQB's -47.3%, ROIC 17.8% vs -30.1%
SYY is the clearest fit if your priority is valuation efficiency and defensive.
- PEG 0.29 vs WMT's 4.07
- Beta 0.47, yield 2.8%, current ratio 1.21x
- 2.8% yield, 37-year raise streak, vs WMT's 0.7%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 100.0% revenue growth vs SYY's 3.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (14.9x vs 44.8x), PEG 0.88 vs 4.07 | |
| Quality / Margins | 5.7% margin vs AQB's -2.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.12 vs AQB's 1.00 | |
| Dividends | 2.8% yield, 37-year raise streak, vs WMT's 0.7%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +32.7% vs SFM's -51.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 12.5% ROA vs AQB's -47.3%, ROIC 17.8% vs -30.1% |
AQB vs WMT vs SFM vs SYY — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
AQB vs WMT vs SFM vs SYY — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
SFM leads in 3 of 6 categories
WMT leads 2 • SYY leads 1 • AQB leads 0
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SFM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WMT and AQB operate at a comparable scale, with $703.1B and $0 in trailing revenue. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 5.7% (SFM) to 2.1% (SYY).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $703.1B | $8.9B | $83.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$926M | $42.8B | $996M | $4.0B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$1.2B | $22.9B | $507M | $1.7B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$4.2B | $15.3B | $361M | $2.0B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +24.9% | +37.0% | +18.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | +4.1% | +7.6% | +3.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | +3.3% | +5.7% | +2.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | +2.2% | +4.1% | +2.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +5.8% | +4.1% | +4.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -3.0% | +35.1% | -5.5% | -13.4% |
Valuation Metrics
SFM leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 15.3x trailing earnings, SFM trades at a 68% valuation discount to WMT's 47.7x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), SYY offers better value at 0.36x vs WMT's 4.33x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $4M | $1.04T | $7.6B | $34.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $7M | $1.09T | $9.3B | $48.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.20x | 47.69x | 15.25x | 19.54x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 44.77x | 14.85x | 15.78x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 4.33x | 0.90x | 0.36x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 24.85x | 9.35x | 11.58x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 1.46x | 0.86x | 0.43x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 10.45x | 5.70x | 19.23x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 24.97x | 16.29x | 19.60x |
Profitability & Efficiency
SFM leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SYY delivers a 80.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $81 in annual profit, vs $-3 for AQB. WMT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.67x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SYY's 7.81x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), WMT scores 6/9 vs AQB's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -2.7% | +22.3% | +36.1% | +80.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -47.3% | +7.9% | +12.5% | +6.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -30.1% | +14.7% | +17.8% | +15.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -41.3% | +17.5% | +22.1% | +19.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 6 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.67x | 1.39x | 7.81x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $3M | $56.4B | $1.7B | $13.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $501,295 | $10.7B | $257M | $1.1B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $3M | $67.1B | $1.9B | $14.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -0.01x | 11.85x | 254.65x | 4.35x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
WMT leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SFM five years ago would be worth $31,381 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $89 for AQB. Over the past 12 months, WMT leads with a +32.7% total return vs SFM's -51.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors WMT at 37.6% vs AQB's -55.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | 0.0% | +15.7% | +0.4% | +1.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +30.2% | +32.7% | -51.7% | +6.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -91.2% | +160.5% | +125.7% | +4.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.1% | +186.9% | +213.8% | -3.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.8% | +499.5% | +203.9% | +82.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -55.5% | +37.6% | +31.2% | +1.3% |
Risk & Volatility
WMT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
WMT is the less volatile stock with a 0.12 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AQB's 1.00 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. WMT currently trades 96.7% from its 52-week high vs AQB's 32.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.35x | 0.11x | 0.16x | 0.46x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $2.95 | $134.69 | $182.00 | $91.69 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.60 | $91.89 | $64.75 | $68.19 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +32.2% | +96.7% | +44.5% | +79.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 51.7 | 55.9 | 54.9 | 41.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 34K | 17.2M | 2.2M | 4.7M |
Analyst Outlook
SYY leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: WMT as "Buy", SFM as "Buy", SYY as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 24.1% upside for SYY (target: $90) vs 5.4% for WMT (target: $137). For income investors, SYY offers the higher dividend yield at 2.80% vs WMT's 0.72%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $137.22 | $91.00 | $90.44 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 64 | 43 | 30 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.7% | — | +2.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 37 | 1 | 37 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.94 | — | $2.04 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.8% | +6.2% | +3.6% |
SFM leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). WMT leads in 2 (Total Returns, Risk & Volatility).
AQB vs WMT vs SFM vs SYY: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is AQB or WMT or SFM or SYY a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Sprouts Farmers Market, Inc.
(SFM) is the stronger pick with 14. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 3. 2% for Sysco Corporation (SYY). Sprouts Farmers Market, Inc. (SFM) offers the better valuation at 15. 3x trailing P/E (14. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Walmart Inc. (WMT) a "Buy" — based on 64 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — AQB or WMT or SFM or SYY?
On trailing P/E, Sprouts Farmers Market, Inc.
(SFM) is the cheapest at 15. 3x versus Walmart Inc. at 47. 7x. On forward P/E, Sprouts Farmers Market, Inc. is actually cheaper at 14. 9x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Sysco Corporation wins at 0. 29x versus Walmart Inc. 's 4. 07x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — AQB or WMT or SFM or SYY?
Over the past 5 years, Sprouts Farmers Market, Inc.
(SFM) delivered a total return of +213. 8%, compared to -99. 1% for AquaBounty Technologies, Inc. (AQB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: WMT returned +501. 4% versus AQB's -99. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — AQB or WMT or SFM or SYY?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Walmart Inc.
(WMT) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 11β versus AquaBounty Technologies, Inc. 's 1. 35β — meaning AQB is approximately 1159% more volatile than WMT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Walmart Inc. (WMT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 67% versus 8% for Sysco Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — AQB or WMT or SFM or SYY?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Sprouts Farmers Market, Inc.
(SFM) is pulling ahead at 14. 1% versus 3. 2% for Sysco Corporation (SYY). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: AquaBounty Technologies, Inc. grew EPS 87. 7% year-over-year, compared to -4. 1% for Sysco Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, SFM leads at 11. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — AQB or WMT or SFM or SYY?
Sprouts Farmers Market, Inc.
(SFM) is the more profitable company, earning 5. 9% net margin versus 0. 0% for AquaBounty Technologies, Inc. — meaning it keeps 5. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SFM leads at 7. 8% versus 0. 0% for AQB. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SFM leads at 37. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is AQB or WMT or SFM or SYY more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Sysco Corporation (SYY) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 29x versus Walmart Inc. 's 4. 07x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Sprouts Farmers Market, Inc. (SFM) trades at 14. 9x forward P/E versus 44. 8x for Walmart Inc. — 29. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SYY: 24. 1% to $90. 44.
08Which pays a better dividend — AQB or WMT or SFM or SYY?
In this comparison, SYY (2.
8% yield), WMT (0. 7% yield) pay a dividend. AQB, SFM do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is AQB or WMT or SFM or SYY better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Walmart Inc.
(WMT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 11), 0. 7% yield, +501. 4% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (WMT: +501. 4%, AQB: -99. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between AQB and WMT and SFM and SYY?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Defensive sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: AQB is a small-cap quality compounder stock; WMT is a mega-cap quality compounder stock; SFM is a small-cap deep-value stock; SYY is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. WMT, SYY pay a dividend while AQB, SFM do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.