Waste Management
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
AQMS vs ALTG vs ENVX vs RCUS vs ECVT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Rental & Leasing Services
Electrical Equipment & Parts
Biotechnology
Chemicals - Specialty
AQMS vs ALTG vs ENVX vs RCUS vs ECVT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Waste Management | Rental & Leasing Services | Electrical Equipment & Parts | Biotechnology | Chemicals - Specialty |
| Market Cap | $17M | $265M | $1.33B | $2.50B | $1.53B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $1.82B | $32M | $236M | $819M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-23M | $-79M | $-157M | $-369M | $-63M |
| Gross Margin | — | 25.7% | 15.4% | 90.7% | 22.6% |
| Operating Margin | — | 0.9% | -5.6% | -168.6% | 15.4% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | — | — | 22.9x |
| Total Debt | $592K | $1.17B | $21M | $99M | $431M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $11M | $19M | $106M | $222M | $197M |
AQMS vs ALTG vs ENVX vs RCUS vs ECVT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jan 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aqua Metals, Inc. (AQMS) | 100 | 0.5 | -99.5% |
| Alta Equipment Grou… (ALTG) | 100 | 85.9 | -14.1% |
| Enovix Corporation (ENVX) | 100 | 47.3 | -52.7% |
| Arcus Biosciences, … (RCUS) | 100 | 71.4 | -28.6% |
| Ecovyst Inc. (ECVT) | 100 | 101.3 | +1.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: AQMS vs ALTG vs ENVX vs RCUS vs ECVT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
AQMS ranks third and is worth considering specifically for quality.
- 1.2% margin vs ENVX's -492.6%
ALTG has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in value and dividends.
- Better valuation composite
- 1.1% yield; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
ENVX is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 37.9%, EPS growth 40.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 72.5%
- 37.9% revenue growth vs RCUS's -4.3%
- -0.0% ROA vs AQMS's -157.5%, ROIC -74.2% vs -166.7%
RCUS is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 45.9% 10Y total return vs ECVT's 9.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.95, Low D/E 15.7%, current ratio 4.36x
- Beta 1.95, current ratio 4.36x
- +209.6% vs AQMS's -51.5%
ECVT is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.90
- Beta 0.90 vs ENVX's 3.40
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 37.9% revenue growth vs RCUS's -4.3% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 1.2% margin vs ENVX's -492.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.90 vs ENVX's 3.40 | |
| Dividends | 1.1% yield; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +209.6% vs AQMS's -51.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -0.0% ROA vs AQMS's -157.5%, ROIC -74.2% vs -166.7% |
AQMS vs ALTG vs ENVX vs RCUS vs ECVT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
AQMS vs ALTG vs ENVX vs RCUS vs ECVT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ECVT leads in 5 of 6 categories
AQMS leads 0 • ALTG leads 0 • ENVX leads 0 • RCUS leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ECVT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ALTG and AQMS operate at a comparable scale, with $1.8B and $0 in trailing revenue. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from -4.3% (ALTG) to -4.9% (ENVX). On growth, ECVT holds the edge at +32.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $1.8B | $32M | $236M | $819M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$22M | $90M | -$142M | -$391M | $136M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$23M | -$79M | -$157M | -$369M | -$63M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$11M | $63M | -$114M | -$489M | $84M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +25.7% | +15.4% | +90.7% | +22.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | +0.9% | -5.6% | -168.6% | +15.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | -4.3% | -4.9% | -156.4% | -7.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | +3.5% | -3.6% | -2.1% | +10.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -3.0% | +15.9% | -39.3% | +32.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +71.4% | +4.6% | +20.0% | +10.5% | +2.3% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — ALTG and ECVT each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, ECVT's 13.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than ALTG's 27.3x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $17M | $265M | $1.3B | $2.5B | $1.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $7M | $1.4B | $1.2B | $2.4B | $1.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.34x | -3.20x | -8.56x | -7.54x | -22.90x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | — | 22.87x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 27.27x | — | — | 13.28x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 0.14x | 41.89x | 10.11x | 2.11x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.52x | — | 4.86x | 4.22x | 2.68x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 7.09x | — | — | 21.87x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ECVT leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ENVX delivers a -0.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-0 in annual profit, vs $-33 for ALTG. AQMS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ECVT's 0.71x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ECVT scores 6/9 vs RCUS's 0/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -2.5% | -32.5% | -0.1% | -69.0% | -10.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -157.5% | -5.7% | -0.0% | -35.3% | -4.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -166.7% | +1.4% | -74.2% | -64.1% | +4.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -139.5% | +2.7% | -27.5% | -42.1% | +4.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.04x | — | 0.08x | 0.16x | 0.71x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$10M | $1.2B | -$85M | -$123M | $234M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $11M | $19M | $106M | $222M | $197M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $592,000 | $1.2B | $21M | $99M | $431M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -32.95x | 0.38x | -7.03x | -13.38x | 2.08x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ECVT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ECVT five years ago would be worth $11,544 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $93 for AQMS. Over the past 12 months, RCUS leads with a +209.6% total return vs AQMS's -51.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ECVT at 9.9% vs AQMS's -71.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -3.6% | +62.8% | -18.6% | +6.5% | +40.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -51.5% | +80.5% | +3.9% | +209.6% | +102.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.7% | -35.8% | -51.8% | +24.9% | +32.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.1% | -33.1% | -51.4% | -18.6% | +15.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.7% | -8.9% | -48.8% | +45.9% | +9.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -71.6% | -13.8% | -21.6% | +7.7% | +9.9% |
Risk & Volatility
ECVT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ECVT is the less volatile stock with a 0.90 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ENVX's 3.40 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ECVT currently trades 93.5% from its 52-week high vs AQMS's 13.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.26x | 2.30x | 3.40x | 1.95x | 0.90x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $39.40 | $8.99 | $16.49 | $28.72 | $14.94 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $3.37 | $4.16 | $4.62 | $7.06 | $6.69 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +13.0% | +90.7% | +38.9% | +86.3% | +93.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 71.9 | 69.1 | 57.9 | 60.5 | 66.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 43K | 212K | 5.7M | 1.2M | 2.2M |
Analyst Outlook
ECVT leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ALTG as "Buy", ENVX as "Buy", RCUS as "Buy", ECVT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 176.5% upside for ENVX (target: $18) vs -30.8% for ECVT (target: $10). ALTG is the only dividend payer here at 1.12% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $8.25 | $17.75 | $30.00 | $9.67 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 5 | 16 | 18 | 6 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +1.1% | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 | — | — | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.09 | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +2.8% | +4.4% | 0.0% | +3.1% |
ECVT leads in 5 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Profitability & Efficiency. 1 category is tied.
AQMS vs ALTG vs ENVX vs RCUS vs ECVT: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is AQMS or ALTG or ENVX or RCUS or ECVT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Enovix Corporation (ENVX) is the stronger pick with 37.
9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -4. 3% for Arcus Biosciences, Inc. (RCUS). Analysts rate Alta Equipment Group Inc. (ALTG) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — AQMS or ALTG or ENVX or RCUS or ECVT?
Over the past 5 years, Ecovyst Inc.
(ECVT) delivered a total return of +15. 4%, compared to -99. 1% for Aqua Metals, Inc. (AQMS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: RCUS returned +45. 9% versus AQMS's -99. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — AQMS or ALTG or ENVX or RCUS or ECVT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Ecovyst Inc.
(ECVT) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 90β versus Enovix Corporation's 3. 40β — meaning ENVX is approximately 275% more volatile than ECVT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Aqua Metals, Inc. (AQMS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 71% for Ecovyst Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — AQMS or ALTG or ENVX or RCUS or ECVT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Enovix Corporation (ENVX) is pulling ahead at 37.
9% versus -4. 3% for Arcus Biosciences, Inc. (RCUS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Aqua Metals, Inc. grew EPS 60. 4% year-over-year, compared to -916. 7% for Ecovyst Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ENVX leads at 72. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — AQMS or ALTG or ENVX or RCUS or ECVT?
Aqua Metals, Inc.
(AQMS) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 0% net margin versus -492. 6% for Enovix Corporation — meaning it keeps 0. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ECVT leads at 9. 0% versus -557. 0% for ENVX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — RCUS leads at 96. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is AQMS or ALTG or ENVX or RCUS or ECVT more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ENVX: 176.
5% to $17. 75.
07Which pays a better dividend — AQMS or ALTG or ENVX or RCUS or ECVT?
In this comparison, ALTG (1.
1% yield) pays a dividend. AQMS, ENVX, RCUS, ECVT do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is AQMS or ALTG or ENVX or RCUS or ECVT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Ecovyst Inc.
(ECVT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 90)). Aqua Metals, Inc. (AQMS) carries a higher beta of 2. 26 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ECVT: +9. 9%, AQMS: -99. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between AQMS and ALTG and ENVX and RCUS and ECVT?
These companies operate in different sectors (AQMS (Industrials) and ALTG (Industrials) and ENVX (Industrials) and RCUS (Healthcare) and ECVT (Basic Materials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: AQMS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ALTG is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ENVX is a small-cap high-growth stock; RCUS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ECVT is a small-cap quality compounder stock. ALTG pays a dividend while AQMS, ENVX, RCUS, ECVT do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.