Waste Management
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
AQMS vs ECVT vs ALB vs ASIX vs HWKN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Chemicals - Specialty
Chemicals - Specialty
Chemicals
Chemicals - Specialty
AQMS vs ECVT vs ALB vs ASIX vs HWKN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Waste Management | Chemicals - Specialty | Chemicals - Specialty | Chemicals | Chemicals - Specialty |
| Market Cap | $17M | $1.53B | $23.37B | $796M | $3.46B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $819M | $5.49B | $1.52B | $1.06B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-23M | $-63M | $-233M | $49M | $82M |
| Gross Margin | — | 22.6% | 18.5% | 10.8% | 22.9% |
| Operating Margin | — | 15.4% | 5.6% | 4.2% | 11.5% |
| Forward P/E | — | 22.9x | 22.4x | 15.7x | 42.3x |
| Total Debt | $592K | $431M | $3.30B | $381M | $160M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $11M | $197M | $1.62B | $20M | $5M |
AQMS vs ECVT vs ALB vs ASIX vs HWKN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aqua Metals, Inc. (AQMS) | 100 | 3.1 | -96.9% |
| Ecovyst Inc. (ECVT) | 100 | 111.3 | +11.3% |
| Albemarle Corporati… (ALB) | 100 | 259.2 | +159.2% |
| AdvanSix Inc. (ASIX) | 100 | 202.8 | +102.8% |
| Hawkins, Inc. (HWKN) | 100 | 778.6 | +678.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: AQMS vs ECVT vs ALB vs ASIX vs HWKN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
AQMS ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth.
- 7.6% revenue growth vs ALB's -4.4%
ECVT is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.90, Low D/E 71.4%, current ratio 2.64x
ALB is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +256.7% vs AQMS's -51.5%
ASIX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.81, yield 2.6%
- Beta 0.81, yield 2.6%, current ratio 1.13x
- Lower P/E (15.7x vs 22.4x)
- Beta 0.81 vs AQMS's 2.26
HWKN is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Rev growth 6.0%, EPS growth 12.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 8.0%
- 7.7% 10Y total return vs ALB's 217.0%
- PEG 1.70 vs ASIX's 8.38
- 7.8% margin vs ECVT's -7.7%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 7.6% revenue growth vs ALB's -4.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (15.7x vs 22.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 7.8% margin vs ECVT's -7.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.81 vs AQMS's 2.26 | |
| Dividends | 2.6% yield, vs ALB's 0.8%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +256.7% vs AQMS's -51.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 8.4% ROA vs AQMS's -157.5%, ROIC 15.9% vs -166.7% |
AQMS vs ECVT vs ALB vs ASIX vs HWKN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
AQMS vs ECVT vs ALB vs ASIX vs HWKN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
HWKN leads in 2 of 6 categories
ASIX leads 1 • AQMS leads 0 • ECVT leads 0 • ALB leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — ECVT and ALB and HWKN each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ALB and AQMS operate at a comparable scale, with $5.5B and $0 in trailing revenue. HWKN is the more profitable business, keeping 7.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ECVT's -7.7%. On growth, ALB holds the edge at +32.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $819M | $5.5B | $1.5B | $1.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$22M | $136M | $802M | $143M | $172M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$23M | -$63M | -$233M | $49M | $82M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$11M | $84M | $577M | $6M | $88M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +22.6% | +18.5% | +10.8% | +22.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | +15.4% | +5.6% | +4.2% | +11.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | -7.7% | -4.2% | +3.2% | +7.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | +10.2% | +10.5% | +0.4% | +8.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +32.6% | +32.7% | +9.4% | +7.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +71.4% | +2.3% | — | -8.8% | -4.2% |
Valuation Metrics
ASIX leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 13.3x trailing earnings, ASIX trades at a 68% valuation discount to HWKN's 41.4x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), HWKN offers better value at 1.67x vs ASIX's 7.10x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $17M | $1.5B | $23.4B | $796M | $3.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $7M | $1.8B | $25.1B | $1.2B | $3.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.34x | -22.90x | -34.50x | 13.34x | 41.44x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 22.87x | 22.36x | 15.74x | 42.31x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 7.10x | 1.67x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 13.28x | 33.21x | 7.86x | 22.74x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 2.11x | 4.55x | 0.52x | 3.55x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.52x | 2.68x | 2.39x | 0.80x | 7.60x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 21.87x | 33.76x | 124.10x | 49.48x |
Profitability & Efficiency
HWKN leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
HWKN delivers a 15.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $16 in annual profit, vs $-3 for AQMS. AQMS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ECVT's 0.71x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ECVT scores 6/9 vs AQMS's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -2.5% | -10.2% | -2.3% | +6.0% | +15.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -157.5% | -4.2% | -1.4% | +2.9% | +8.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -166.7% | +4.2% | +0.6% | +4.4% | +15.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -139.5% | +4.6% | +0.6% | +5.3% | +19.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.04x | 0.71x | 0.34x | 0.47x | 0.35x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$10M | $234M | $1.7B | $361M | $155M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $11M | $197M | $1.6B | $20M | $5M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $592,000 | $431M | $3.3B | $381M | $160M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -32.95x | 2.08x | 1.59x | 7.92x | 10.27x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
HWKN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in HWKN five years ago would be worth $49,115 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $93 for AQMS. Over the past 12 months, ALB leads with a +256.7% total return vs AQMS's -51.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HWKN at 61.2% vs AQMS's -71.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -3.6% | +40.9% | +38.1% | +40.3% | +15.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -51.5% | +102.7% | +256.7% | +8.2% | +40.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.7% | +32.9% | +9.3% | -25.6% | +318.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.1% | +15.4% | +26.8% | -15.9% | +391.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.7% | +9.9% | +217.0% | +60.6% | +765.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -71.6% | +9.9% | +3.0% | -9.4% | +61.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — ECVT and ASIX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ASIX is the less volatile stock with a 0.81 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AQMS's 2.26 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ECVT currently trades 93.5% from its 52-week high vs AQMS's 13.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.26x | 0.90x | 1.60x | 0.81x | 0.98x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $39.40 | $14.94 | $221.00 | $26.73 | $186.15 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $3.37 | $6.69 | $53.70 | $14.10 | $115.35 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +13.0% | +93.5% | +89.8% | +89.8% | +89.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 71.9 | 66.9 | 53.0 | 60.6 | 62.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 43K | 2.2M | 2.0M | 453K | 169K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — ALB and ASIX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ECVT as "Buy", ALB as "Hold", ASIX as "Buy", HWKN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply -3.8% upside for ALB (target: $191) vs -30.8% for ECVT (target: $10). For income investors, ASIX offers the higher dividend yield at 2.62% vs HWKN's 0.42%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $9.67 | $190.80 | $22.00 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 6 | 45 | 6 | 1 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +0.8% | +2.6% | +0.4% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 2 | 15 | 0 | 5 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $1.62 | $0.63 | $0.70 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +3.1% | 0.0% | +0.2% | +0.7% |
HWKN leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). ASIX leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 3 tied.
AQMS vs ECVT vs ALB vs ASIX vs HWKN: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is AQMS or ECVT or ALB or ASIX or HWKN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Hawkins, Inc.
(HWKN) is the stronger pick with 6. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -4. 4% for Albemarle Corporation (ALB). AdvanSix Inc. (ASIX) offers the better valuation at 13. 3x trailing P/E (15. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Ecovyst Inc. (ECVT) a "Buy" — based on 6 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — AQMS or ECVT or ALB or ASIX or HWKN?
On trailing P/E, AdvanSix Inc.
(ASIX) is the cheapest at 13. 3x versus Hawkins, Inc. at 41. 4x. On forward P/E, AdvanSix Inc. is actually cheaper at 15. 7x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Hawkins, Inc. wins at 1. 70x versus AdvanSix Inc. 's 8. 38x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — AQMS or ECVT or ALB or ASIX or HWKN?
Over the past 5 years, Hawkins, Inc.
(HWKN) delivered a total return of +391. 1%, compared to -99. 1% for Aqua Metals, Inc. (AQMS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HWKN returned +765. 9% versus AQMS's -99. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — AQMS or ECVT or ALB or ASIX or HWKN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), AdvanSix Inc.
(ASIX) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 81β versus Aqua Metals, Inc. 's 2. 26β — meaning AQMS is approximately 179% more volatile than ASIX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Aqua Metals, Inc. (AQMS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 71% for Ecovyst Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — AQMS or ECVT or ALB or ASIX or HWKN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Hawkins, Inc.
(HWKN) is pulling ahead at 6. 0% versus -4. 4% for Albemarle Corporation (ALB). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Aqua Metals, Inc. grew EPS 60. 4% year-over-year, compared to -916. 7% for Ecovyst Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, HWKN leads at 8. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — AQMS or ECVT or ALB or ASIX or HWKN?
Hawkins, Inc.
(HWKN) is the more profitable company, earning 8. 7% net margin versus -9. 9% for Albemarle Corporation — meaning it keeps 8. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HWKN leads at 12. 2% versus 0. 0% for AQMS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HWKN leads at 23. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is AQMS or ECVT or ALB or ASIX or HWKN more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Hawkins, Inc. (HWKN) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 70x versus AdvanSix Inc. 's 8. 38x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, AdvanSix Inc. (ASIX) trades at 15. 7x forward P/E versus 42. 3x for Hawkins, Inc. — 26. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ALB: -3. 8% to $190. 80.
08Which pays a better dividend — AQMS or ECVT or ALB or ASIX or HWKN?
In this comparison, ASIX (2.
6% yield), ALB (0. 8% yield), HWKN (0. 4% yield) pay a dividend. AQMS, ECVT do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is AQMS or ECVT or ALB or ASIX or HWKN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, AdvanSix Inc.
(ASIX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 81), 2. 6% yield). Aqua Metals, Inc. (AQMS) carries a higher beta of 2. 26 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ASIX: +60. 6%, AQMS: -99. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between AQMS and ECVT and ALB and ASIX and HWKN?
These companies operate in different sectors (AQMS (Industrials) and ECVT (Basic Materials) and ALB (Basic Materials) and ASIX (Basic Materials) and HWKN (Basic Materials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: AQMS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ECVT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ALB is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; ASIX is a small-cap deep-value stock; HWKN is a small-cap quality compounder stock. ALB, ASIX pay a dividend while AQMS, ECVT, HWKN do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.