Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

AQMS vs ECVT vs ALB vs ASIX vs HWKN

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
AQMS
Aqua Metals, Inc.

Waste Management

IndustrialsNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$17M
5Y Perf.-96.9%
ECVT
Ecovyst Inc.

Chemicals - Specialty

Basic MaterialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$1.53B
5Y Perf.+11.3%
ALB
Albemarle Corporation

Chemicals - Specialty

Basic MaterialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$23.37B
5Y Perf.+159.2%
ASIX
AdvanSix Inc.

Chemicals

Basic MaterialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$796M
5Y Perf.+102.8%
HWKN
Hawkins, Inc.

Chemicals - Specialty

Basic MaterialsNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$3.46B
5Y Perf.+678.6%

AQMS vs ECVT vs ALB vs ASIX vs HWKN — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
AQMS logoAQMS
ECVT logoECVT
ALB logoALB
ASIX logoASIX
HWKN logoHWKN
IndustryWaste ManagementChemicals - SpecialtyChemicals - SpecialtyChemicalsChemicals - Specialty
Market Cap$17M$1.53B$23.37B$796M$3.46B
Revenue (TTM)$0.00$819M$5.49B$1.52B$1.06B
Net Income (TTM)$-23M$-63M$-233M$49M$82M
Gross Margin22.6%18.5%10.8%22.9%
Operating Margin15.4%5.6%4.2%11.5%
Forward P/E22.9x22.4x15.7x42.3x
Total Debt$592K$431M$3.30B$381M$160M
Cash & Equiv.$11M$197M$1.62B$20M$5M

AQMS vs ECVT vs ALB vs ASIX vs HWKNLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

AQMS
ECVT
ALB
ASIX
HWKN
StockMay 20May 26Return
Aqua Metals, Inc. (AQMS)1003.1-96.9%
Ecovyst Inc. (ECVT)100111.3+11.3%
Albemarle Corporati… (ALB)100259.2+159.2%
AdvanSix Inc. (ASIX)100202.8+102.8%
Hawkins, Inc. (HWKN)100778.6+678.6%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: AQMS vs ECVT vs ALB vs ASIX vs HWKN

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: ASIX leads in 3 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and capital preservation and lower volatility. Hawkins, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for profitability and margin quality and operational efficiency and capital deployment. AQMS and ALB also each lead in at least one category. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
AQMS
Aqua Metals, Inc.
The Growth Leader

AQMS ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth.

  • 7.6% revenue growth vs ALB's -4.4%
Best for: growth
ECVT
Ecovyst Inc.
The Defensive Pick

ECVT is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.

  • Lower volatility, beta 0.90, Low D/E 71.4%, current ratio 2.64x
Best for: sleep-well-at-night
ALB
Albemarle Corporation
The Momentum Pick

ALB is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.

  • +256.7% vs AQMS's -51.5%
Best for: momentum
ASIX
AdvanSix Inc.
The Income Pick

ASIX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and defensive.

  • Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.81, yield 2.6%
  • Beta 0.81, yield 2.6%, current ratio 1.13x
  • Lower P/E (15.7x vs 22.4x)
  • Beta 0.81 vs AQMS's 2.26
Best for: income & stability and defensive
HWKN
Hawkins, Inc.
The Growth Play

HWKN is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.

  • Rev growth 6.0%, EPS growth 12.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 8.0%
  • 7.7% 10Y total return vs ALB's 217.0%
  • PEG 1.70 vs ASIX's 8.38
  • 7.8% margin vs ECVT's -7.7%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthAQMS logoAQMS7.6% revenue growth vs ALB's -4.4%
ValueASIX logoASIXLower P/E (15.7x vs 22.4x)
Quality / MarginsHWKN logoHWKN7.8% margin vs ECVT's -7.7%
Stability / SafetyASIX logoASIXBeta 0.81 vs AQMS's 2.26
DividendsASIX logoASIX2.6% yield, vs ALB's 0.8%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)ALB logoALB+256.7% vs AQMS's -51.5%
Efficiency (ROA)HWKN logoHWKN8.4% ROA vs AQMS's -157.5%, ROIC 15.9% vs -166.7%

AQMS vs ECVT vs ALB vs ASIX vs HWKN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

AQMSAqua Metals, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

ECVTEcovyst Inc.
FY 2025
Other Services
100.0%$34M
ALBAlbemarle Corporation
FY 2025
Energy Storage
52.7%$2.7B
Specialties
26.6%$1.4B
Ketjen
20.7%$1.1B
ASIXAdvanSix Inc.
FY 2025
Chemical Intermediates
39.4%$377M
Nylon Resins
32.3%$310M
Caprolactam
28.3%$271M
HWKNHawkins, Inc.
FY 2025
Bulk
88.0%$96M
Other
12.0%$13M

AQMS vs ECVT vs ALB vs ASIX vs HWKN — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLHWKNLAGGINGALB

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

Evenly matched — ECVT and ALB and HWKN each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

ALB and AQMS operate at a comparable scale, with $5.5B and $0 in trailing revenue. HWKN is the more profitable business, keeping 7.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ECVT's -7.7%. On growth, ALB holds the edge at +32.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricAQMS logoAQMSAqua Metals, Inc.ECVT logoECVTEcovyst Inc.ALB logoALBAlbemarle Corpora…ASIX logoASIXAdvanSix Inc.HWKN logoHWKNHawkins, Inc.
RevenueTrailing 12 months$0$819M$5.5B$1.5B$1.1B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$22M$136M$802M$143M$172M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$23M-$63M-$233M$49M$82M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$11M$84M$577M$6M$88M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+22.6%+18.5%+10.8%+22.9%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+15.4%+5.6%+4.2%+11.5%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-7.7%-4.2%+3.2%+7.8%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+10.2%+10.5%+0.4%+8.2%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+32.6%+32.7%+9.4%+7.9%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+71.4%+2.3%-8.8%-4.2%
Evenly matched — ECVT and ALB and HWKN each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

ASIX leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 13.3x trailing earnings, ASIX trades at a 68% valuation discount to HWKN's 41.4x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), HWKN offers better value at 1.67x vs ASIX's 7.10x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricAQMS logoAQMSAqua Metals, Inc.ECVT logoECVTEcovyst Inc.ALB logoALBAlbemarle Corpora…ASIX logoASIXAdvanSix Inc.HWKN logoHWKNHawkins, Inc.
Market CapShares × price$17M$1.5B$23.4B$796M$3.5B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$7M$1.8B$25.1B$1.2B$3.6B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-0.34x-22.90x-34.50x13.34x41.44x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.22.87x22.36x15.74x42.31x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate7.10x1.67x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple13.28x33.21x7.86x22.74x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue2.11x4.55x0.52x3.55x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.52x2.68x2.39x0.80x7.60x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF21.87x33.76x124.10x49.48x
ASIX leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

HWKN leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

HWKN delivers a 15.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $16 in annual profit, vs $-3 for AQMS. AQMS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ECVT's 0.71x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ECVT scores 6/9 vs AQMS's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricAQMS logoAQMSAqua Metals, Inc.ECVT logoECVTEcovyst Inc.ALB logoALBAlbemarle Corpora…ASIX logoASIXAdvanSix Inc.HWKN logoHWKNHawkins, Inc.
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-2.5%-10.2%-2.3%+6.0%+15.9%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-157.5%-4.2%-1.4%+2.9%+8.4%
ROICReturn on invested capital-166.7%+4.2%+0.6%+4.4%+15.9%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-139.5%+4.6%+0.6%+5.3%+19.3%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–936666
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.04x0.71x0.34x0.47x0.35x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$10M$234M$1.7B$361M$155M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$11M$197M$1.6B$20M$5M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$592,000$431M$3.3B$381M$160M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-32.95x2.08x1.59x7.92x10.27x
HWKN leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

HWKN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in HWKN five years ago would be worth $49,115 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $93 for AQMS. Over the past 12 months, ALB leads with a +256.7% total return vs AQMS's -51.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HWKN at 61.2% vs AQMS's -71.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricAQMS logoAQMSAqua Metals, Inc.ECVT logoECVTEcovyst Inc.ALB logoALBAlbemarle Corpora…ASIX logoASIXAdvanSix Inc.HWKN logoHWKNHawkins, Inc.
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-3.6%+40.9%+38.1%+40.3%+15.1%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-51.5%+102.7%+256.7%+8.2%+40.6%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-97.7%+32.9%+9.3%-25.6%+318.9%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-99.1%+15.4%+26.8%-15.9%+391.1%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-99.7%+9.9%+217.0%+60.6%+765.9%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-71.6%+9.9%+3.0%-9.4%+61.2%
HWKN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — ECVT and ASIX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

ASIX is the less volatile stock with a 0.81 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AQMS's 2.26 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ECVT currently trades 93.5% from its 52-week high vs AQMS's 13.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricAQMS logoAQMSAqua Metals, Inc.ECVT logoECVTEcovyst Inc.ALB logoALBAlbemarle Corpora…ASIX logoASIXAdvanSix Inc.HWKN logoHWKNHawkins, Inc.
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5002.26x0.90x1.60x0.81x0.98x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$39.40$14.94$221.00$26.73$186.15
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$3.37$6.69$53.70$14.10$115.35
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+13.0%+93.5%+89.8%+89.8%+89.7%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10071.966.953.060.662.9
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded43K2.2M2.0M453K169K
Evenly matched — ECVT and ASIX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — ALB and ASIX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: ECVT as "Buy", ALB as "Hold", ASIX as "Buy", HWKN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply -3.8% upside for ALB (target: $191) vs -30.8% for ECVT (target: $10). For income investors, ASIX offers the higher dividend yield at 2.62% vs HWKN's 0.42%.

MetricAQMS logoAQMSAqua Metals, Inc.ECVT logoECVTEcovyst Inc.ALB logoALBAlbemarle Corpora…ASIX logoASIXAdvanSix Inc.HWKN logoHWKNHawkins, Inc.
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyHoldBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$9.67$190.80$22.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts64561
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+0.8%+2.6%+0.4%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises21505
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$1.62$0.63$0.70
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+3.1%0.0%+0.2%+0.7%
Evenly matched — ALB and ASIX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

HWKN leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). ASIX leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 3 tied.

Best OverallHawkins, Inc. (HWKN)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

AQMS vs ECVT vs ALB vs ASIX vs HWKN: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is AQMS or ECVT or ALB or ASIX or HWKN a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Hawkins, Inc.

(HWKN) is the stronger pick with 6. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -4. 4% for Albemarle Corporation (ALB). AdvanSix Inc. (ASIX) offers the better valuation at 13. 3x trailing P/E (15. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Ecovyst Inc. (ECVT) a "Buy" — based on 6 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — AQMS or ECVT or ALB or ASIX or HWKN?

On trailing P/E, AdvanSix Inc.

(ASIX) is the cheapest at 13. 3x versus Hawkins, Inc. at 41. 4x. On forward P/E, AdvanSix Inc. is actually cheaper at 15. 7x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Hawkins, Inc. wins at 1. 70x versus AdvanSix Inc. 's 8. 38x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — AQMS or ECVT or ALB or ASIX or HWKN?

Over the past 5 years, Hawkins, Inc.

(HWKN) delivered a total return of +391. 1%, compared to -99. 1% for Aqua Metals, Inc. (AQMS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HWKN returned +765. 9% versus AQMS's -99. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — AQMS or ECVT or ALB or ASIX or HWKN?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), AdvanSix Inc.

(ASIX) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 81β versus Aqua Metals, Inc. 's 2. 26β — meaning AQMS is approximately 179% more volatile than ASIX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Aqua Metals, Inc. (AQMS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 71% for Ecovyst Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — AQMS or ECVT or ALB or ASIX or HWKN?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Hawkins, Inc.

(HWKN) is pulling ahead at 6. 0% versus -4. 4% for Albemarle Corporation (ALB). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Aqua Metals, Inc. grew EPS 60. 4% year-over-year, compared to -916. 7% for Ecovyst Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, HWKN leads at 8. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — AQMS or ECVT or ALB or ASIX or HWKN?

Hawkins, Inc.

(HWKN) is the more profitable company, earning 8. 7% net margin versus -9. 9% for Albemarle Corporation — meaning it keeps 8. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HWKN leads at 12. 2% versus 0. 0% for AQMS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HWKN leads at 23. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is AQMS or ECVT or ALB or ASIX or HWKN more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Hawkins, Inc. (HWKN) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 70x versus AdvanSix Inc. 's 8. 38x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, AdvanSix Inc. (ASIX) trades at 15. 7x forward P/E versus 42. 3x for Hawkins, Inc. — 26. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ALB: -3. 8% to $190. 80.

08

Which pays a better dividend — AQMS or ECVT or ALB or ASIX or HWKN?

In this comparison, ASIX (2.

6% yield), ALB (0. 8% yield), HWKN (0. 4% yield) pay a dividend. AQMS, ECVT do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is AQMS or ECVT or ALB or ASIX or HWKN better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, AdvanSix Inc.

(ASIX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 81), 2. 6% yield). Aqua Metals, Inc. (AQMS) carries a higher beta of 2. 26 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ASIX: +60. 6%, AQMS: -99. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between AQMS and ECVT and ALB and ASIX and HWKN?

These companies operate in different sectors (AQMS (Industrials) and ECVT (Basic Materials) and ALB (Basic Materials) and ASIX (Basic Materials) and HWKN (Basic Materials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: AQMS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ECVT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ALB is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; ASIX is a small-cap deep-value stock; HWKN is a small-cap quality compounder stock. ALB, ASIX pay a dividend while AQMS, ECVT, HWKN do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

AQMS

Quality Business

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

ECVT

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Basic Materials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 16%
  • Gross Margin > 13%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

ALB

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Basic Materials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 16%
  • Dividend Yield > 0.5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

ASIX

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Basic Materials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Dividend Yield > 1.0%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

HWKN

Stable Dividend Mega-Cap

  • Sector: Basic Materials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.