Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
AQST vs DARE vs NKTR vs PRGO vs ABBV
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic
Drug Manufacturers - General
AQST vs DARE vs NKTR vs PRGO vs ABBV — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic | Drug Manufacturers - General |
| Market Cap | $516M | $25M | $1.69B | $1.61B | $358.42B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $45M | $-57K | $55M | $4.18B | $61.16B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-84M | $-17M | $-164M | $-1.82B | $4.23B |
| Gross Margin | 58.3% | -1461.1% | 99.6% | 34.2% | 70.2% |
| Operating Margin | -159.5% | -2396.9% | -237.9% | -4.1% | 26.7% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | — | 5.5x | 14.3x |
| Total Debt | $131M | $1M | $149M | $3.97B | $69.07B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $121M | $16M | $15M | $532M | $5.23B |
AQST vs DARE vs NKTR vs PRGO vs ABBV — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aquestive Therapeut… (AQST) | 100 | 88.7 | -11.3% |
| Daré Bioscience, In… (DARE) | 100 | 21.8 | -78.2% |
| Nektar Therapeutics (NKTR) | 100 | 25.2 | -74.8% |
| Perrigo Company plc (PRGO) | 100 | 21.4 | -78.6% |
| AbbVie Inc. (ABBV) | 100 | 217.5 | +117.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: AQST vs DARE vs NKTR vs PRGO vs ABBV
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
AQST lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
Among these 5 stocks, DARE doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
NKTR ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.
- +8.2% vs PRGO's -51.2%
PRGO is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night and defensive is your priority.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.18, current ratio 2.76x
- Beta 1.18, yield 9.8%, current ratio 2.76x
- Lower P/E (5.5x vs 14.3x)
- 9.8% yield, 10-year raise streak, vs ABBV's 3.2%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
ABBV carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 13 yrs, beta 0.34, yield 3.2%
- Rev growth 8.6%, EPS growth -0.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 1.8%
- 295.5% 10Y total return vs AQST's -73.6%
- 8.6% revenue growth vs DARE's -99.7%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 8.6% revenue growth vs DARE's -99.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (5.5x vs 14.3x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 6.9% margin vs DARE's -414.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.34 vs NKTR's 1.85 | |
| Dividends | 9.8% yield, 10-year raise streak, vs ABBV's 3.2%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +8.2% vs PRGO's -51.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 3.1% ROA vs AQST's -64.5% |
AQST vs DARE vs NKTR vs PRGO vs ABBV — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
AQST vs DARE vs NKTR vs PRGO vs ABBV — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ABBV leads in 3 of 6 categories
PRGO leads 1 • NKTR leads 1 • AQST leads 0 • DARE leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ABBV leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ABBV and DARE operate at a comparable scale, with $61.2B and -$57,130 in trailing revenue. ABBV is the more profitable business, keeping 6.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to DARE's -414.3%. On growth, ABBV holds the edge at +10.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $45M | -$57,130 | $55M | $4.2B | $61.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$70M | -$16M | -$130M | $58M | $24.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$84M | -$17M | -$164M | -$1.8B | $4.2B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$53M | -$7M | -$209M | $108M | $18.7B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +58.3% | -1461.1% | +99.6% | +34.2% | +70.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -159.5% | -2396.9% | -2.4% | -4.1% | +26.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -188.1% | -414.3% | -3.0% | -43.5% | +6.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -119.0% | +492.8% | -3.8% | +2.6% | +30.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +9.7% | -94.6% | -25.3% | -7.2% | +10.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -36.8% | +49.2% | -4.5% | -56.4% | +57.4% |
Valuation Metrics
PRGO leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, PRGO's 7.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than ABBV's 15.0x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $516M | $25M | $1.7B | $1.6B | $358.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $527M | $11M | $1.8B | $5.1B | $422.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -5.57x | -6.06x | -8.57x | -1.14x | 85.50x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | 5.53x | 14.28x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — | 7.42x | 14.96x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 11.59x | 2587.71x | 30.64x | 0.38x | 5.86x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | — | 15.66x | 0.55x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 5.25x | — | 11.12x | 20.12x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ABBV leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ABBV delivers a 62.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $62 in annual profit, vs $-6 for DARE. PRGO carries lower financial leverage with a 1.35x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NKTR's 1.66x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ABBV scores 6/9 vs AQST's 1/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | -6.1% | -4.0% | -50.7% | +62.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -64.5% | -56.8% | -62.8% | -19.8% | +3.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | — | -57.2% | +3.7% | +23.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -72.7% | -36.2% | -55.7% | +4.3% | +21.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | — | 1.66x | 1.35x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $10M | -$14M | $134M | $3.4B | $63.8B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $121M | $16M | $15M | $532M | $5.2B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $131M | $1M | $149M | $4.0B | $69.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -3.97x | -35.60x | -4.74x | -7.20x | 3.28x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NKTR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ABBV five years ago would be worth $20,131 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,757 for DARE. Over the past 12 months, NKTR leads with a +818.2% total return vs PRGO's -51.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NKTR at 93.3% vs DARE's -37.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -34.4% | +49.2% | +92.0% | -13.5% | -10.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +54.9% | +0.7% | +818.2% | -51.2% | +11.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +88.0% | -75.8% | +621.8% | -58.1% | +50.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +23.7% | -82.4% | -72.3% | -60.1% | +101.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -73.6% | -99.0% | -59.1% | -77.7% | +295.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +23.4% | -37.6% | +93.3% | -25.2% | +14.6% |
Risk & Volatility
ABBV leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ABBV is the less volatile stock with a 0.34 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NKTR's 1.85 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ABBV currently trades 82.8% from its 52-week high vs DARE's 31.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.26x | 0.33x | 1.80x | 1.21x | 0.28x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $7.55 | $9.19 | $109.00 | $28.44 | $244.81 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.12 | $1.27 | $7.99 | $9.23 | $176.57 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +56.0% | +31.7% | +76.5% | +41.2% | +82.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 54.7 | 70.2 | 53.4 | 60.9 | 46.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.5M | 581K | 991K | 3.4M | 5.8M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — PRGO and ABBV each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: AQST as "Buy", NKTR as "Buy", PRGO as "Hold", ABBV as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 208.9% upside for PRGO (target: $36) vs 26.6% for ABBV (target: $257). For income investors, PRGO offers the higher dividend yield at 9.81% vs ABBV's 3.24%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | — | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $9.00 | — | $147.33 | $36.20 | $256.64 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 10 | — | 33 | 36 | 41 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | +9.8% | +3.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | 10 | 13 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | $1.15 | $6.57 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.3% |
ABBV leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). PRGO leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
AQST vs DARE vs NKTR vs PRGO vs ABBV: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is AQST or DARE or NKTR or PRGO or ABBV a better buy right now?
For growth investors, AbbVie Inc.
(ABBV) is the stronger pick with 8. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -99. 7% for Daré Bioscience, Inc. (DARE). AbbVie Inc. (ABBV) offers the better valuation at 85. 5x trailing P/E (14. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Aquestive Therapeutics, Inc. (AQST) a "Buy" — based on 10 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — AQST or DARE or NKTR or PRGO or ABBV?
On forward P/E, Perrigo Company plc is actually cheaper at 5.
5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — AQST or DARE or NKTR or PRGO or ABBV?
Over the past 5 years, AbbVie Inc.
(ABBV) delivered a total return of +101. 3%, compared to -82. 4% for Daré Bioscience, Inc. (DARE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ABBV returned +293. 8% versus DARE's -99. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — AQST or DARE or NKTR or PRGO or ABBV?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), AbbVie Inc.
(ABBV) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 28β versus Nektar Therapeutics's 1. 80β — meaning NKTR is approximately 552% more volatile than ABBV relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Perrigo Company plc (PRGO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 135% versus 166% for Nektar Therapeutics — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — AQST or DARE or NKTR or PRGO or ABBV?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), AbbVie Inc.
(ABBV) is pulling ahead at 8. 6% versus -99. 7% for Daré Bioscience, Inc. (DARE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Daré Bioscience, Inc. grew EPS 88. 4% year-over-year, compared to -723. 2% for Perrigo Company plc. Over a 3-year CAGR, ABBV leads at 1. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — AQST or DARE or NKTR or PRGO or ABBV?
AbbVie Inc.
(ABBV) is the more profitable company, earning 6. 9% net margin versus -414. 3% for Daré Bioscience, Inc. — meaning it keeps 6. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ABBV leads at 32. 8% versus -2396. 9% for DARE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NKTR leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is AQST or DARE or NKTR or PRGO or ABBV more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Perrigo Company plc (PRGO) trades at 5.
5x forward P/E versus 14. 3x for AbbVie Inc. — 8. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PRGO: 208. 9% to $36. 20.
08Which pays a better dividend — AQST or DARE or NKTR or PRGO or ABBV?
In this comparison, PRGO (9.
8% yield), ABBV (3. 2% yield) pay a dividend. AQST, DARE, NKTR do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is AQST or DARE or NKTR or PRGO or ABBV better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, AbbVie Inc.
(ABBV) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 28), 3. 2% yield, +293. 8% 10Y return). Nektar Therapeutics (NKTR) carries a higher beta of 1. 80 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ABBV: +293. 8%, NKTR: -59. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between AQST and DARE and NKTR and PRGO and ABBV?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: AQST is a small-cap quality compounder stock; DARE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NKTR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PRGO is a small-cap income-oriented stock; ABBV is a large-cap income-oriented stock. PRGO, ABBV pay a dividend while AQST, DARE, NKTR do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.