Software - Infrastructure
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
ARAI vs MVIS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Hardware, Equipment & Parts
ARAI vs MVIS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Infrastructure | Hardware, Equipment & Parts |
| Market Cap | $23M | $205M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $98K | $1M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-10M | $-95M |
| Gross Margin | 38.9% | -14.4% |
| Operating Margin | -99.8% | -57.4% |
| Total Debt | $19K | $37M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $129K | $32M |
ARAI vs MVIS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 25 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Arrive AI Inc. (ARAI) | 100 | 11.6 | -88.4% |
| MicroVision, Inc. (MVIS) | 100 | 60.8 | -39.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ARAI vs MVIS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ARAI is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- EPS growth 37.5%
MVIS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 2.66
- -63.3% 10Y total return vs ARAI's -94.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 2.66, Low D/E 66.2%, current ratio 2.69x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Quality / Margins | -78.6% margin vs ARAI's -104.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 2.66 vs ARAI's 3.69 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | -41.9% vs ARAI's -94.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -74.3% ROA vs ARAI's -150.3% |
ARAI vs MVIS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
ARAI vs MVIS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MVIS leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MVIS is the larger business by revenue, generating $1M annually — 12.3x ARAI's $98,175. MVIS is the more profitable business, keeping -78.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ARAI's -104.3%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $98,175 | $1M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$10M | -$64M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$10M | -$95M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$5M | -$59M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +38.9% | -14.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -99.8% | -57.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -104.3% | -78.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -56.0% | -49.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -86.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -154.5% | +14.3% |
Valuation Metrics
ARAI leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $23M | $205M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $23M | $209M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -4.51x | -1.91x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 169.62x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 3.29x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — ARAI and MVIS each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MVIS delivers a -137.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-137 in annual profit, vs $-3 for ARAI. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ARAI scores 4/9 vs MVIS's 3/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -3.1% | -137.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -150.3% | -74.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | -98.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | — | -93.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.66x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$110,236 | $4M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $129,318 | $32M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $19,082 | $37M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -12.23x | -3.54x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MVIS leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ARAI five years ago would be worth $510 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $482 for MVIS. Over the past 12 months, MVIS leads with a -41.9% total return vs ARAI's -94.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MVIS at -34.0% vs ARAI's -62.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -75.1% | -24.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -94.9% | -41.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -94.9% | -71.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -94.9% | -95.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -94.9% | -63.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -62.9% | -34.0% |
Risk & Volatility
MVIS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MVIS is the less volatile stock with a 2.66 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ARAI's 3.69 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MVIS currently trades 38.6% from its 52-week high vs ARAI's 1.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 3.69x | 2.66x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $40.00 | $1.73 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.51 | $0.51 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +1.7% | +38.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 42.8 | 44.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 11.0M | 5.4M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $5.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 7 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
MVIS leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). ARAI leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
ARAI vs MVIS: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ARAI or MVIS a better buy right now?
Analysts rate MicroVision, Inc.
(MVIS) a "Buy" — based on 7 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — ARAI or MVIS?
Over the past 5 years, Arrive AI Inc.
(ARAI) delivered a total return of -94. 9%, compared to -95. 2% for MicroVision, Inc. (MVIS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MVIS returned -63. 3% versus ARAI's -94. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — ARAI or MVIS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), MicroVision, Inc.
(MVIS) is the lower-risk stock at 2. 66β versus Arrive AI Inc. 's 3. 69β — meaning ARAI is approximately 39% more volatile than MVIS relative to the S&P 500.
04Which is growing faster — ARAI or MVIS?
On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Arrive AI Inc.
grew EPS 37. 5% year-over-year, compared to 23. 9% for MicroVision, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — ARAI or MVIS?
MicroVision, Inc.
(MVIS) is the more profitable company, earning -78. 6% net margin versus -104. 3% for Arrive AI Inc. — meaning it keeps -78. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MVIS leads at -57. 4% versus -99. 8% for ARAI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ARAI leads at 38. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — ARAI or MVIS?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is ARAI or MVIS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, MicroVision, Inc.
(MVIS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding. Arrive AI Inc. (ARAI) carries a higher beta of 3. 69 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (MVIS: -63. 3%, ARAI: -94. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between ARAI and MVIS?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.