REIT - Office
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
ARE vs BXP vs SLG vs VNO
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
REIT - Office
REIT - Office
REIT - Office
ARE vs BXP vs SLG vs VNO — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | REIT - Office | REIT - Office | REIT - Office | REIT - Office |
| Market Cap | $7.89B | $9.43B | $3.22B | $6.03B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2.90B | $3.48B | $981M | $1.81B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-1.02B | $277M | $-88M | $795M |
| Gross Margin | 68.2% | 60.6% | 58.2% | 73.2% |
| Operating Margin | -42.8% | 42.3% | 42.7% | 13.3% |
| Forward P/E | 78.8x | 35.7x | — | 376.9x |
| Total Debt | $12.76B | $17.36B | $7.91B | $7.89B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $549M | $1.48B | $336M | $841M |
ARE vs BXP vs SLG vs VNO — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alexandria Real Est… (ARE) | 100 | 29.7 | -70.3% |
| BXP, Inc. (BXP) | 100 | 69.2 | -30.8% |
| SL Green Realty Cor… (SLG) | 100 | 101.3 | +1.3% |
| Vornado Realty Trust (VNO) | 100 | 88.5 | -11.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ARE vs BXP vs SLG vs VNO
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ARE has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 15 yrs, beta 0.95, yield 11.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.95, Low D/E 66.6%, current ratio 0.43x
- Beta 0.95 vs SLG's 1.20, lower leverage
- 11.7% yield, 15-year raise streak, vs BXP's 6.8%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
BXP is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if defensive is your priority.
- Beta 0.96, yield 6.8%, current ratio 2.28x
- Better valuation composite
- -2.4% vs ARE's -30.9%
SLG is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 42.0%, EPS growth -21.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 5.2%
- -26.2% 10Y total return vs ARE's -8.6%
- 42.0% FFO/revenue growth vs ARE's -2.6%
VNO is the clearest fit if your priority is quality and efficiency.
- 44.0% margin vs ARE's -35.3%
- 6.4% ROA vs ARE's -2.9%, ROIC 1.4% vs -2.7%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 42.0% FFO/revenue growth vs ARE's -2.6% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 44.0% margin vs ARE's -35.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.95 vs SLG's 1.20, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 11.7% yield, 15-year raise streak, vs BXP's 6.8%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | -2.4% vs ARE's -30.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.4% ROA vs ARE's -2.9%, ROIC 1.4% vs -2.7% |
ARE vs BXP vs SLG vs VNO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
ARE vs BXP vs SLG vs VNO — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
VNO leads in 2 of 6 categories
ARE leads 1 • BXP leads 0 • SLG leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
VNO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BXP is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.5B annually — 3.5x SLG's $981M. VNO is the more profitable business, keeping 44.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ARE's -35.3%. On growth, SLG holds the edge at +9.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2.9B | $3.5B | $981M | $1.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $74M | $2.4B | $678M | $719M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$1.0B | $277M | -$88M | $795M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $1.4B | $690M | $28M | $1.3B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +68.2% | +60.6% | +58.2% | +73.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -42.8% | +42.3% | +42.7% | +13.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -35.3% | +8.0% | -9.0% | +44.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +48.4% | +19.8% | +2.9% | +69.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -9.7% | +2.2% | +9.2% | -0.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +31.9% | +2.1% | -13.2% | -127.9% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — ARE and BXP each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 7.6x trailing earnings, VNO trades at a 78% valuation discount to BXP's 34.2x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, BXP's 8.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than ARE's 135.6x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $7.9B | $9.4B | $3.2B | $6.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $20.1B | $25.3B | $10.8B | $13.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -5.40x | 34.17x | -28.48x | 7.63x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 78.79x | 35.65x | — | 376.94x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 135.65x | 8.89x | 26.34x | 17.34x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.66x | 2.71x | 3.21x | 3.33x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.41x | 1.23x | 0.73x | 0.90x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 5.58x | 13.68x | — | 4.79x |
Profitability & Efficiency
VNO leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
VNO delivers a 11.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $12 in annual profit, vs $-5 for ARE. ARE carries lower financial leverage with a 0.67x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BXP's 2.26x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), VNO scores 7/9 vs SLG's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -5.0% | +3.6% | -2.0% | +11.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -2.9% | +1.1% | -0.8% | +6.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -2.7% | +6.1% | +1.1% | +1.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -3.6% | +7.8% | +1.5% | +1.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 6 | 2 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.67x | 2.26x | 1.82x | 1.16x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $12.2B | $15.9B | $7.6B | $7.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $549M | $1.5B | $336M | $841M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $12.8B | $17.4B | $7.9B | $7.9B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -4.37x | 1.59x | — | 3.63x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — SLG and VNO each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SLG five years ago would be worth $8,473 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,887 for ARE. Over the past 12 months, BXP leads with a -2.4% total return vs ARE's -30.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors VNO at 34.9% vs ARE's -21.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -5.5% | -11.3% | -2.3% | -4.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -30.9% | -2.4% | -13.3% | -15.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -51.0% | +38.2% | +144.9% | +145.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -61.1% | -27.7% | -15.3% | -17.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -8.6% | -27.8% | -26.2% | -34.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -21.2% | +11.4% | +34.8% | +34.9% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — ARE and BXP each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ARE is the less volatile stock with a 0.95 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SLG's 1.20 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BXP currently trades 75.0% from its 52-week high vs ARE's 51.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.95x | 0.96x | 1.20x | 1.19x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $88.24 | $79.33 | $66.91 | $43.37 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $39.41 | $49.72 | $34.77 | $24.57 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +51.7% | +75.0% | +67.7% | +73.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 52.2 | 63.7 | 63.8 | 68.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.5M | 2.4M | 1.3M | 2.0M |
Analyst Outlook
ARE leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ARE as "Hold", BXP as "Buy", SLG as "Hold", VNO as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 21.3% upside for BXP (target: $72) vs 11.4% for SLG (target: $50). For income investors, ARE offers the higher dividend yield at 11.74% vs VNO's 2.30%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $55.00 | $72.10 | $50.46 | $37.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 24 | 42 | 31 | 28 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +11.7% | +6.8% | — | +2.3% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 15 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $5.35 | $4.05 | — | $0.74 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +2.6% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.8% |
VNO leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). ARE leads in 1 (Analyst Outlook). 3 tied.
ARE vs BXP vs SLG vs VNO: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ARE or BXP or SLG or VNO a better buy right now?
For growth investors, SL Green Realty Corp.
(SLG) is the stronger pick with 42. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -2. 6% for Alexandria Real Estate Equities, Inc. (ARE). Vornado Realty Trust (VNO) offers the better valuation at 7. 6x trailing P/E (376. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate BXP, Inc. (BXP) a "Buy" — based on 42 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ARE or BXP or SLG or VNO?
On trailing P/E, Vornado Realty Trust (VNO) is the cheapest at 7.
6x versus BXP, Inc. at 34. 2x. On forward P/E, BXP, Inc. is actually cheaper at 35. 7x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ARE or BXP or SLG or VNO?
Over the past 5 years, SL Green Realty Corp.
(SLG) delivered a total return of -15. 3%, compared to -61. 1% for Alexandria Real Estate Equities, Inc. (ARE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ARE returned -8. 6% versus VNO's -34. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ARE or BXP or SLG or VNO?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Alexandria Real Estate Equities, Inc.
(ARE) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 95β versus SL Green Realty Corp. 's 1. 20β — meaning SLG is approximately 26% more volatile than ARE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Alexandria Real Estate Equities, Inc. (ARE) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 67% versus 2% for BXP, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ARE or BXP or SLG or VNO?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), SL Green Realty Corp.
(SLG) is pulling ahead at 42. 0% versus -2. 6% for Alexandria Real Estate Equities, Inc. (ARE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Vornado Realty Trust grew EPS 104. 0% year-over-year, compared to -21. 2% for SL Green Realty Corp.. Over a 3-year CAGR, SLG leads at 5. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ARE or BXP or SLG or VNO?
Vornado Realty Trust (VNO) is the more profitable company, earning 50.
0% net margin versus -48. 2% for Alexandria Real Estate Equities, Inc. — meaning it keeps 50. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BXP leads at 55. 7% versus -40. 5% for ARE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — VNO leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ARE or BXP or SLG or VNO more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, BXP, Inc.
(BXP) trades at 35. 7x forward P/E versus 376. 9x for Vornado Realty Trust — 341. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BXP: 21. 3% to $72. 10.
08Which pays a better dividend — ARE or BXP or SLG or VNO?
In this comparison, ARE (11.
7% yield), BXP (6. 8% yield), VNO (2. 3% yield) pay a dividend. SLG does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is ARE or BXP or SLG or VNO better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Alexandria Real Estate Equities, Inc.
(ARE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 95), 11. 7% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (ARE: -8. 6%, SLG: -26. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ARE and BXP and SLG and VNO?
Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: ARE is a small-cap income-oriented stock; BXP is a small-cap income-oriented stock; SLG is a small-cap high-growth stock; VNO is a small-cap deep-value stock. ARE, BXP, VNO pay a dividend while SLG does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.