REIT - Office
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
ARE vs VNO
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
REIT - Office
ARE vs VNO — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | REIT - Office | REIT - Office |
| Market Cap | $7.89B | $6.03B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2.90B | $1.81B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-1.02B | $795M |
| Gross Margin | 68.2% | 73.2% |
| Operating Margin | -42.8% | 13.3% |
| Forward P/E | 78.8x | 376.9x |
| Total Debt | $12.76B | $7.89B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $549M | $841M |
ARE vs VNO — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alexandria Real Est… (ARE) | 100 | 29.7 | -70.3% |
| Vornado Realty Trust (VNO) | 100 | 88.5 | -11.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ARE vs VNO
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ARE is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 15 yrs, beta 0.95, yield 11.7%
- -8.6% 10Y total return vs VNO's -34.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.95, Low D/E 66.6%, current ratio 0.43x
VNO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 1.3%, EPS growth 104.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 0.2%
- 1.3% FFO/revenue growth vs ARE's -2.6%
- 44.0% margin vs ARE's -35.3%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 1.3% FFO/revenue growth vs ARE's -2.6% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (78.8x vs 376.9x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 44.0% margin vs ARE's -35.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.95 vs VNO's 1.19, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 11.7% yield, 15-year raise streak, vs VNO's 2.3% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | -15.7% vs ARE's -30.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.4% ROA vs ARE's -2.9%, ROIC 1.4% vs -2.7% |
ARE vs VNO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
ARE vs VNO — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
VNO leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ARE is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.9B annually — 1.6x VNO's $1.8B. VNO is the more profitable business, keeping 44.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ARE's -35.3%. On growth, VNO holds the edge at -0.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2.9B | $1.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $74M | $719M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$1.0B | $795M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $1.4B | $1.3B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +68.2% | +73.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -42.8% | +13.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -35.3% | +44.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +48.4% | +69.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -9.7% | -0.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +31.9% | -127.9% |
Valuation Metrics
ARE leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, VNO's 17.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than ARE's 135.6x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $7.9B | $6.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $20.1B | $13.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -5.40x | 7.63x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 78.79x | 376.94x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 135.65x | 17.34x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.66x | 3.33x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.41x | 0.90x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 5.58x | 4.79x |
Profitability & Efficiency
VNO leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
VNO delivers a 11.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $12 in annual profit, vs $-5 for ARE. ARE carries lower financial leverage with a 0.67x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to VNO's 1.16x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), VNO scores 7/9 vs ARE's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -5.0% | +11.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -2.9% | +6.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -2.7% | +1.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -3.6% | +1.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.67x | 1.16x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $12.2B | $7.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $549M | $841M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $12.8B | $7.9B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -4.37x | 3.63x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
VNO leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in VNO five years ago would be worth $8,238 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,887 for ARE. Over the past 12 months, VNO leads with a -15.7% total return vs ARE's -30.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors VNO at 34.9% vs ARE's -21.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -5.5% | -4.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -30.9% | -15.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -51.0% | +145.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -61.1% | -17.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -8.6% | -34.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -21.2% | +34.9% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — ARE and VNO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ARE is the less volatile stock with a 0.95 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than VNO's 1.19 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. VNO currently trades 73.9% from its 52-week high vs ARE's 51.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.95x | 1.19x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $88.24 | $43.37 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $39.41 | $24.57 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +51.7% | +73.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 52.2 | 68.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.5M | 2.0M |
Analyst Outlook
ARE leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates ARE as "Hold" and VNO as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 20.7% upside for ARE (target: $55) vs 17.0% for VNO (target: $38). For income investors, ARE offers the higher dividend yield at 11.74% vs VNO's 2.30%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $55.00 | $37.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 24 | 28 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +11.7% | +2.3% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 15 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $5.35 | $0.74 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +2.6% | +0.8% |
VNO leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). ARE leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.
ARE vs VNO: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ARE or VNO a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Vornado Realty Trust (VNO) is the stronger pick with 1.
3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -2. 6% for Alexandria Real Estate Equities, Inc. (ARE). Vornado Realty Trust (VNO) offers the better valuation at 7. 6x trailing P/E (376. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Alexandria Real Estate Equities, Inc. (ARE) a "Hold" — based on 24 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ARE or VNO?
On forward P/E, Alexandria Real Estate Equities, Inc.
is actually cheaper at 78. 8x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ARE or VNO?
Over the past 5 years, Vornado Realty Trust (VNO) delivered a total return of -17.
6%, compared to -61. 1% for Alexandria Real Estate Equities, Inc. (ARE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ARE returned -8. 6% versus VNO's -34. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ARE or VNO?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Alexandria Real Estate Equities, Inc.
(ARE) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 95β versus Vornado Realty Trust's 1. 19β — meaning VNO is approximately 25% more volatile than ARE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Alexandria Real Estate Equities, Inc. (ARE) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 67% versus 116% for Vornado Realty Trust — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ARE or VNO?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Vornado Realty Trust (VNO) is pulling ahead at 1.
3% versus -2. 6% for Alexandria Real Estate Equities, Inc. (ARE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Vornado Realty Trust grew EPS 104. 0% year-over-year, compared to -568. 9% for Alexandria Real Estate Equities, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ARE leads at 4. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ARE or VNO?
Vornado Realty Trust (VNO) is the more profitable company, earning 50.
0% net margin versus -48. 2% for Alexandria Real Estate Equities, Inc. — meaning it keeps 50. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: VNO leads at 15. 0% versus -40. 5% for ARE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — VNO leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ARE or VNO more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Alexandria Real Estate Equities, Inc.
(ARE) trades at 78. 8x forward P/E versus 376. 9x for Vornado Realty Trust — 298. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ARE: 20. 7% to $55. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — ARE or VNO?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Alexandria Real Estate Equities, Inc. (ARE) offers the highest yield at 11. 7%, versus 2. 3% for Vornado Realty Trust (VNO).
09Is ARE or VNO better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Alexandria Real Estate Equities, Inc.
(ARE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 95), 11. 7% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (ARE: -8. 6%, VNO: -34. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ARE and VNO?
Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: ARE is a small-cap income-oriented stock; VNO is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.