Apparel - Footwear & Accessories
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
AREB vs BUD vs TAP vs SAM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Beverages - Alcoholic
Beverages - Alcoholic
Beverages - Alcoholic
AREB vs BUD vs TAP vs SAM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Apparel - Footwear & Accessories | Beverages - Alcoholic | Beverages - Alcoholic | Beverages - Alcoholic |
| Market Cap | $90.00 | $137.47B | $7.96B | $2.12B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $10M | $119.82B | $11.19B | $2.09B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-34M | $12.57B | $-2.11B | $-61M |
| Gross Margin | -2.1% | 55.2% | 37.8% | 45.2% |
| Operating Margin | -155.0% | 31.7% | -20.3% | -3.8% |
| Forward P/E | — | 18.7x | 8.9x | 20.8x |
| Total Debt | $2M | $72.17B | $6.30B | $38M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $148K | $11.17B | $897M | $223M |
AREB vs BUD vs TAP vs SAM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| American Rebel Hold… (AREB) | 100 | 0.0 | -100.0% |
| Anheuser-Busch InBe… (BUD) | 100 | 170.4 | +70.4% |
| Molson Coors Bevera… (TAP) | 100 | 111.7 | +11.7% |
| The Boston Beer Com… (SAM) | 100 | 34.9 | -65.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: AREB vs BUD vs TAP vs SAM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
AREB lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
BUD carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.
- -23.9% 10Y total return vs SAM's 28.4%
- 10.5% margin vs AREB's -360.5%
- +21.2% vs AREB's -100.0%
- 6.0% ROA vs AREB's -155.5%, ROIC 7.5% vs -235.6%
TAP is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and defensive is your priority.
- Dividend streak 5 yrs, beta 0.02, yield 4.5%
- Beta 0.02, yield 4.5%, current ratio 0.55x
- Lower P/E (8.9x vs 20.8x)
- Beta 0.02 vs AREB's 1.23
SAM is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 3.7%, EPS growth 95.5%, 3Y rev CAGR -0.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.31, Low D/E 4.5%, current ratio 1.65x
- 3.7% revenue growth vs AREB's -16.6%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 3.7% revenue growth vs AREB's -16.6% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (8.9x vs 20.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 10.5% margin vs AREB's -360.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.02 vs AREB's 1.23 | |
| Dividends | 4.5% yield, 5-year raise streak, vs BUD's 1.6%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +21.2% vs AREB's -100.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.0% ROA vs AREB's -155.5%, ROIC 7.5% vs -235.6% |
AREB vs BUD vs TAP vs SAM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
AREB vs BUD vs TAP vs SAM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
BUD leads in 2 of 6 categories
TAP leads 2 • AREB leads 0 • SAM leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BUD leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BUD is the larger business by revenue, generating $119.8B annually — 12583.6x AREB's $10M. BUD is the more profitable business, keeping 10.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to AREB's -3.6%. On growth, AREB holds the edge at +28.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $10M | $119.8B | $11.2B | $2.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$15M | $38.8B | -$1.5B | $14M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$34M | $12.6B | -$2.1B | -$61M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$14M | $32.2B | $1.2B | $191M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -2.1% | +55.2% | +37.8% | +45.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -155.0% | +31.7% | -20.3% | -3.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -3.6% | +10.5% | -18.9% | -2.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -150.8% | +26.9% | +10.4% | +9.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +28.5% | +0.4% | +2.0% | +1.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +55.6% | +32.3% | +35.6% | -7.4% |
Valuation Metrics
TAP leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 20.0x trailing earnings, SAM trades at a 29% valuation discount to BUD's 27.9x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, SAM's 8.2x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than BUD's 9.4x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $90 | $137.5B | $8.0B | $2.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2M | $198.5B | $13.4B | $1.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 0.00x | 27.93x | -3.91x | 19.95x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 18.69x | 8.95x | 20.77x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 9.44x | — | 8.21x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.00x | 2.30x | 0.71x | 1.01x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.00x | 1.84x | 0.79x | 2.47x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 12.28x | 7.46x | 9.82x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — BUD and SAM each lead in 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BUD delivers a 13.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $14 in annual profit, vs $-8 for AREB. SAM carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BUD's 0.81x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BUD scores 9/9 vs AREB's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -7.8% | +13.8% | -18.6% | -7.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -155.5% | +6.0% | -8.9% | -5.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -2.4% | +7.5% | -10.1% | +15.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -49.4% | +8.7% | -11.6% | +14.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 9 | 4 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.52x | 0.81x | 0.60x | 0.04x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $2M | $61.0B | $5.4B | -$186M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $147,586 | $11.2B | $897M | $223M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2M | $72.2B | $6.3B | $38M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -12.58x | 2.53x | -9.99x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
BUD leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in BUD five years ago would be worth $11,300 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $0 for AREB. Over the past 12 months, BUD leads with a +21.2% total return vs AREB's -100.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BUD at 8.8% vs SAM's -14.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -100.0% | +27.2% | -9.5% | -1.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -100.0% | +21.2% | -18.4% | -19.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | +28.7% | -25.9% | -36.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | +13.0% | -15.4% | -82.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | -23.9% | -42.1% | +28.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | — | +8.8% | -9.5% | -14.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — BUD and TAP each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TAP is the less volatile stock with a 0.02 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AREB's 1.23 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BUD currently trades 96.4% from its 52-week high vs AREB's 0.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.23x | 0.33x | 0.02x | 0.31x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $127200.00 | $82.91 | $57.57 | $264.46 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.07 | $56.97 | $40.64 | $185.34 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +0.0% | +96.4% | +73.7% | +74.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 15.8 | 64.2 | 49.5 | 27.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 3.0M | 2.0M | 2.9M | 199K |
Analyst Outlook
TAP leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: BUD as "Buy", TAP as "Hold", SAM as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 21.5% upside for SAM (target: $240) vs 10.8% for TAP (target: $47). For income investors, TAP offers the higher dividend yield at 4.53% vs BUD's 1.64%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $89.00 | $47.00 | $239.78 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 45 | 37 | 31 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +1.6% | +4.5% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 | 5 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $1.31 | $1.92 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.7% | +8.1% | +9.7% |
BUD leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). TAP leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). 2 tied.
AREB vs BUD vs TAP vs SAM: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is AREB or BUD or TAP or SAM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, The Boston Beer Company, Inc.
(SAM) is the stronger pick with 3. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -16. 6% for American Rebel Holdings, Inc. (AREB). The Boston Beer Company, Inc. (SAM) offers the better valuation at 20. 0x trailing P/E (20. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV (BUD) a "Buy" — based on 45 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — AREB or BUD or TAP or SAM?
On trailing P/E, The Boston Beer Company, Inc.
(SAM) is the cheapest at 20. 0x versus Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV at 27. 9x. On forward P/E, Molson Coors Beverage Company is actually cheaper at 8. 9x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — AREB or BUD or TAP or SAM?
Over the past 5 years, Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV (BUD) delivered a total return of +13.
0%, compared to -100. 0% for American Rebel Holdings, Inc. (AREB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SAM returned +28. 4% versus AREB's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — AREB or BUD or TAP or SAM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Molson Coors Beverage Company (TAP) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
02β versus American Rebel Holdings, Inc. 's 1. 23β — meaning AREB is approximately 5501% more volatile than TAP relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, The Boston Beer Company, Inc. (SAM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 81% for Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — AREB or BUD or TAP or SAM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), The Boston Beer Company, Inc.
(SAM) is pulling ahead at 3. 7% versus -16. 6% for American Rebel Holdings, Inc. (AREB). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: The Boston Beer Company, Inc. grew EPS 95. 5% year-over-year, compared to -302. 8% for Molson Coors Beverage Company. Over a 3-year CAGR, AREB leads at 6. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — AREB or BUD or TAP or SAM?
Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV (BUD) is the more profitable company, earning 9.
8% net margin versus -360. 5% for American Rebel Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 9. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BUD leads at 25. 9% versus -155. 0% for AREB. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BUD leads at 55. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is AREB or BUD or TAP or SAM more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Molson Coors Beverage Company (TAP) trades at 8.
9x forward P/E versus 20. 8x for The Boston Beer Company, Inc. — 11. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SAM: 21. 5% to $239. 78.
08Which pays a better dividend — AREB or BUD or TAP or SAM?
In this comparison, TAP (4.
5% yield), BUD (1. 6% yield) pay a dividend. AREB, SAM do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is AREB or BUD or TAP or SAM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Molson Coors Beverage Company (TAP) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
02), 4. 5% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (TAP: -42. 1%, AREB: -100. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between AREB and BUD and TAP and SAM?
These companies operate in different sectors (AREB (Consumer Cyclical) and BUD (Consumer Defensive) and TAP (Consumer Defensive) and SAM (Consumer Defensive)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: AREB is a small-cap quality compounder stock; BUD is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; TAP is a small-cap income-oriented stock; SAM is a small-cap quality compounder stock. BUD, TAP pay a dividend while AREB, SAM do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.
Compare BUD vs ABEV
ABEV is one of the most direct listed alternatives to BUD.
Compare AREB vs STZ
STZ overlaps with AREB in an adjacent operating segment worth comparing.
Add STZ to This Comparison
STZ is the strongest missing peer across the current compare set.