Internet Content & Information
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
AREN vs FUBO vs GOOGL vs DKNG vs PENN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Broadcasting
Internet Content & Information
Gambling, Resorts & Casinos
Gambling, Resorts & Casinos
AREN vs FUBO vs GOOGL vs DKNG vs PENN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Internet Content & Information | Broadcasting | Internet Content & Information | Gambling, Resorts & Casinos | Gambling, Resorts & Casinos |
| Market Cap | $133M | $317M | $4.81T | $12.50B | $2.24B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $135M | $2.72B | $422.57B | $6.05B | $6.96B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $125M | $156M | $160.21B | $4M | $-843M |
| Gross Margin | 50.7% | 11.1% | 60.4% | 41.3% | 30.6% |
| Operating Margin | 30.3% | -2.6% | 32.7% | -0.2% | -7.9% |
| Forward P/E | 4.7x | — | 29.6x | 99.1x | 23.0x |
| Total Debt | $100M | $670M | $59.29B | $1.93B | $8.38B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $10M | $452M | $30.71B | $1.60B | $687M |
AREN vs FUBO vs GOOGL vs DKNG vs PENN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| The Arena Group Hol… (AREN) | 100 | 29.5 | -70.5% |
| fuboTV Inc. (FUBO) | 100 | 7.8 | -92.2% |
| Alphabet Inc. (GOOGL) | 100 | 555.2 | +455.2% |
| DraftKings Inc. (DKNG) | 100 | 63.5 | -36.5% |
| PENN Entertainment,… (PENN) | 100 | 51.1 | -48.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: AREN vs FUBO vs GOOGL vs DKNG vs PENN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
AREN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.10, current ratio 2.10x
- Beta 1.10, current ratio 2.10x
- Lower P/E (4.7x vs 23.0x)
- 92.6% margin vs PENN's -12.1%
FUBO ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 67.7%, EPS growth 96.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 39.2%
- 67.7% revenue growth vs PENN's 5.8%
GOOGL is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 1.26, yield 0.2%
- 10.0% 10Y total return vs DKNG's 157.3%
- 0.2% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
- +163.5% vs FUBO's -65.6%
DKNG lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
Among these 5 stocks, PENN doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 67.7% revenue growth vs PENN's 5.8% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (4.7x vs 23.0x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 92.6% margin vs PENN's -12.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.10 vs FUBO's 1.77 | |
| Dividends | 0.2% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +163.5% vs FUBO's -65.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 104.8% ROA vs PENN's -5.7%, ROIC 82.8% vs 1.8% |
AREN vs FUBO vs GOOGL vs DKNG vs PENN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
AREN vs FUBO vs GOOGL vs DKNG vs PENN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
AREN leads in 2 of 6 categories
GOOGL leads 2 • FUBO leads 0 • DKNG leads 0 • PENN leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — AREN and GOOGL each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GOOGL is the larger business by revenue, generating $422.6B annually — 3134.1x AREN's $135M. AREN is the more profitable business, keeping 92.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PENN's -12.1%. On growth, FUBO holds the edge at +2.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $135M | $2.7B | $422.6B | $6.1B | $7.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $50M | -$14M | $161.3B | $266M | -$105M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $125M | $156M | $160.2B | $4M | -$843M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $30M | -$81M | $73.3B | $612M | -$169M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +50.7% | +11.1% | +60.4% | +41.3% | +30.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +30.3% | -2.6% | +32.7% | -0.2% | -7.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +92.6% | +5.7% | +37.9% | +0.1% | -12.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +22.5% | -3.0% | +17.3% | +10.1% | -2.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -22.0% | +2.5% | +21.8% | +42.8% | +8.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -21.4% | +81.8% | +81.9% | +192.9% | +37.5% |
Valuation Metrics
AREN leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 1.1x trailing earnings, AREN trades at a 97% valuation discount to GOOGL's 36.8x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, AREN's 4.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than DKNG's 49.4x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $133M | $317M | $4.81T | $12.5B | $2.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $223M | $534M | $4.84T | $12.8B | $9.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 1.06x | -44.88x | 36.82x | -3113.58x | -2.88x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 4.73x | — | 29.61x | 99.14x | 22.95x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 1.23x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 4.48x | — | 32.22x | 49.42x | 13.81x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.99x | 0.12x | 11.95x | 2.06x | 0.32x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 0.12x | 11.72x | 19.81x | 1.33x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 3.39x | — | 65.72x | 19.31x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
AREN leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
GOOGL delivers a 39.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $39 in annual profit, vs $-35 for PENN. GOOGL carries lower financial leverage with a 0.14x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PENN's 4.58x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AREN scores 7/9 vs FUBO's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | +16.2% | +39.0% | +0.5% | -34.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +104.8% | +8.1% | +27.4% | +0.1% | -5.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +82.8% | -3.3% | +25.1% | -0.9% | +1.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +91.0% | -4.1% | +30.3% | -0.6% | +2.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 4 | 7 | 7 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.25x | 0.14x | 3.06x | 4.58x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $90M | $218M | $28.6B | $330M | $7.7B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $10M | $452M | $30.7B | $1.6B | $687M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $100M | $670M | $59.3B | $1.9B | $8.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 3.58x | 10.35x | 392.15x | 1.92x | -1.02x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
GOOGL leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in GOOGL five years ago would be worth $33,982 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $521 for FUBO. Over the past 12 months, GOOGL leads with a +163.5% total return vs FUBO's -65.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GOOGL at 54.8% vs FUBO's -21.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -29.4% | -65.3% | +26.4% | -29.3% | +12.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -45.3% | -65.6% | +163.5% | -27.3% | +6.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -30.4% | -51.7% | +270.8% | +4.3% | -35.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -84.9% | -94.8% | +239.8% | -47.9% | -80.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -20.7% | -90.3% | +996.1% | +157.3% | +11.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -11.4% | -21.6% | +54.8% | +1.4% | -13.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — AREN and GOOGL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
AREN is the less volatile stock with a 1.10 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FUBO's 1.77 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GOOGL currently trades 99.5% from its 52-week high vs FUBO's 19.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.10x | 1.77x | 1.26x | 1.12x | 1.34x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $10.05 | $56.64 | $400.10 | $48.78 | $20.61 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.72 | $2.48 | $147.84 | $20.46 | $11.65 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +27.8% | +19.0% | +99.5% | +51.7% | +81.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 63.0 | 38.0 | 83.4 | 55.1 | 55.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 77K | 1.9M | 28.3M | 12.9M | 4.4M |
Analyst Outlook
GOOGL leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: AREN as "Buy", FUBO as "Hold", GOOGL as "Buy", DKNG as "Buy", PENN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 299.3% upside for FUBO (target: $43) vs 2.1% for GOOGL (target: $406). GOOGL is the only dividend payer here at 0.21% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $10.00 | $43.00 | $406.28 | $36.88 | $19.88 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 2 | 14 | 82 | 48 | 47 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +0.2% | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | — | 2 | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $0.82 | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.9% | +6.6% | +15.8% |
AREN leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). GOOGL leads in 2 (Total Returns, Analyst Outlook). 2 tied.
AREN vs FUBO vs GOOGL vs DKNG vs PENN: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is AREN or FUBO or GOOGL or DKNG or PENN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, fuboTV Inc.
(FUBO) is the stronger pick with 67. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 5. 8% for PENN Entertainment, Inc. (PENN). The Arena Group Holdings, Inc. (AREN) offers the better valuation at 1. 1x trailing P/E (4. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate The Arena Group Holdings, Inc. (AREN) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — AREN or FUBO or GOOGL or DKNG or PENN?
On trailing P/E, The Arena Group Holdings, Inc.
(AREN) is the cheapest at 1. 1x versus Alphabet Inc. at 36. 8x. On forward P/E, The Arena Group Holdings, Inc. is actually cheaper at 4. 7x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — AREN or FUBO or GOOGL or DKNG or PENN?
Over the past 5 years, Alphabet Inc.
(GOOGL) delivered a total return of +239. 8%, compared to -94. 8% for fuboTV Inc. (FUBO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GOOGL returned +996. 1% versus FUBO's -90. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — AREN or FUBO or GOOGL or DKNG or PENN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Arena Group Holdings, Inc.
(AREN) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 10β versus fuboTV Inc. 's 1. 77β — meaning FUBO is approximately 60% more volatile than AREN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Alphabet Inc. (GOOGL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 14% versus 5% for PENN Entertainment, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — AREN or FUBO or GOOGL or DKNG or PENN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), fuboTV Inc.
(FUBO) is pulling ahead at 67. 7% versus 5. 8% for PENN Entertainment, Inc. (PENN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: The Arena Group Holdings, Inc. grew EPS 191. 9% year-over-year, compared to -184. 4% for PENN Entertainment, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, DKNG leads at 39. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — AREN or FUBO or GOOGL or DKNG or PENN?
The Arena Group Holdings, Inc.
(AREN) is the more profitable company, earning 92. 6% net margin versus -12. 1% for PENN Entertainment, Inc. — meaning it keeps 92. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: GOOGL leads at 32. 1% versus -2. 6% for FUBO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — GOOGL leads at 59. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is AREN or FUBO or GOOGL or DKNG or PENN more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, The Arena Group Holdings, Inc.
(AREN) trades at 4. 7x forward P/E versus 99. 1x for DraftKings Inc. — 94. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FUBO: 299. 3% to $43. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — AREN or FUBO or GOOGL or DKNG or PENN?
In this comparison, GOOGL (0.
2% yield) pays a dividend. AREN, FUBO, DKNG, PENN do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is AREN or FUBO or GOOGL or DKNG or PENN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Alphabet Inc.
(GOOGL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 26), +996. 1% 10Y return). fuboTV Inc. (FUBO) carries a higher beta of 1. 77 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (GOOGL: +996. 1%, FUBO: -90. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between AREN and FUBO and GOOGL and DKNG and PENN?
These companies operate in different sectors (AREN (Communication Services) and FUBO (Communication Services) and GOOGL (Communication Services) and DKNG (Consumer Cyclical) and PENN (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: AREN is a small-cap deep-value stock; FUBO is a small-cap high-growth stock; GOOGL is a mega-cap high-growth stock; DKNG is a mid-cap high-growth stock; PENN is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.