Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
ARGX vs JNJ
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Drug Manufacturers - General
ARGX vs JNJ — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Drug Manufacturers - General |
| Market Cap | $49.97B | $541.31B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $3.95B | $92.15B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $923M | $25.12B |
| Gross Margin | 75.5% | 68.1% |
| Operating Margin | -1.0% | 26.1% |
| Forward P/E | 30.7x | 19.4x |
| Total Debt | $39M | $36.63B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1.50B | $24.11B |
ARGX vs JNJ — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| argenx SE (ARGX) | 100 | 368.2 | +268.2% |
| Johnson & Johnson (JNJ) | 100 | 151.0 | +51.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ARGX vs JNJ
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ARGX is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 78.6%, EPS growth 347.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 63.9%
- 34.1% 10Y total return vs JNJ's 136.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.52, Low D/E 0.7%, current ratio 7.29x
JNJ carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 36 yrs, beta 0.06, yield 2.2%
- Beta 0.06, yield 2.2%, current ratio 1.11x
- Lower P/E (19.4x vs 30.7x)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 78.6% revenue growth vs JNJ's 4.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (19.4x vs 30.7x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 27.3% margin vs ARGX's 23.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.06 vs ARGX's 0.52 | |
| Dividends | 2.2% yield; 36-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +48.8% vs ARGX's +31.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 13.0% ROA vs ARGX's 12.9%, ROIC 20.7% vs -0.5% |
ARGX vs JNJ — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
ARGX vs JNJ — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JNJ leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JNJ is the larger business by revenue, generating $92.1B annually — 23.3x ARGX's $4.0B. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 27.3% (JNJ) to 23.3% (ARGX).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $4.0B | $92.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $95M | $31.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $923M | $25.1B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $213M | $19.1B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +75.5% | +68.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -1.0% | +26.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +23.3% | +27.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +5.4% | +20.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +5.1% | +6.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +12.6% | +91.0% |
Valuation Metrics
JNJ leads this category, winning 4 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 38.8x trailing earnings, JNJ trades at a 39% valuation discount to ARGX's 63.2x P/E.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $50.0B | $541.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $48.5B | $553.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 63.19x | 38.79x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 30.72x | 19.39x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 34.49x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 18.78x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 22.82x | 6.09x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 9.57x | 7.63x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 27.28x |
Profitability & Efficiency
JNJ leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
JNJ delivers a 31.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $32 in annual profit, vs $15 for ARGX. ARGX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JNJ's 0.51x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), JNJ scores 5/9 vs ARGX's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +15.1% | +31.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +12.9% | +13.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -0.5% | +20.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -0.4% | +17.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.01x | 0.51x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$1.5B | $12.5B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1.5B | $24.1B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $39M | $36.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 166.64x | 48.23x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ARGX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ARGX five years ago would be worth $31,266 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $14,803 for JNJ. Over the past 12 months, JNJ leads with a +48.8% total return vs ARGX's +31.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ARGX at 25.8% vs JNJ's 13.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -3.9% | +9.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +31.3% | +48.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +98.9% | +47.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +212.7% | +48.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +3411.1% | +136.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +25.8% | +13.9% |
Risk & Volatility
JNJ leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
JNJ is the less volatile stock with a 0.06 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ARGX's 0.52 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.52x | 0.06x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $934.62 | $251.71 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $510.06 | $146.12 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +86.4% | +89.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 53.7 | 38.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 329K | 7.0M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates ARGX as "Buy" and JNJ as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 30.3% upside for ARGX (target: $1052) vs 11.0% for JNJ (target: $249). JNJ is the only dividend payer here at 2.17% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $1052.30 | $249.27 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 36 | 40 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +2.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 36 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $4.87 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.4% |
JNJ leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). ARGX leads in 1 (Total Returns).
ARGX vs JNJ: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ARGX or JNJ a better buy right now?
For growth investors, argenx SE (ARGX) is the stronger pick with 78.
6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 4. 3% for Johnson & Johnson (JNJ). Johnson & Johnson (JNJ) offers the better valuation at 38. 8x trailing P/E (19. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate argenx SE (ARGX) a "Buy" — based on 36 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ARGX or JNJ?
On trailing P/E, Johnson & Johnson (JNJ) is the cheapest at 38.
8x versus argenx SE at 63. 2x. On forward P/E, Johnson & Johnson is actually cheaper at 19. 4x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ARGX or JNJ?
Over the past 5 years, argenx SE (ARGX) delivered a total return of +212.
7%, compared to +48. 0% for Johnson & Johnson (JNJ). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ARGX returned +34. 1% versus JNJ's +136. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ARGX or JNJ?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Johnson & Johnson (JNJ) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
06β versus argenx SE's 0. 52β — meaning ARGX is approximately 821% more volatile than JNJ relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, argenx SE (ARGX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 51% for Johnson & Johnson — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ARGX or JNJ?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), argenx SE (ARGX) is pulling ahead at 78.
6% versus 4. 3% for Johnson & Johnson (JNJ). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: argenx SE grew EPS 347. 7% year-over-year, compared to -57. 8% for Johnson & Johnson. Over a 3-year CAGR, ARGX leads at 63. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ARGX or JNJ?
argenx SE (ARGX) is the more profitable company, earning 38.
0% net margin versus 15. 8% for Johnson & Johnson — meaning it keeps 38. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: JNJ leads at 24. 9% versus -1. 0% for ARGX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ARGX leads at 89. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ARGX or JNJ more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Johnson & Johnson (JNJ) trades at 19.
4x forward P/E versus 30. 7x for argenx SE — 11. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ARGX: 30. 3% to $1052. 30.
08Which pays a better dividend — ARGX or JNJ?
In this comparison, JNJ (2.
2% yield) pays a dividend. ARGX does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is ARGX or JNJ better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Johnson & Johnson (JNJ) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
06), 2. 2% yield, +136. 2% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (JNJ: +136. 2%, ARGX: +34. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ARGX and JNJ?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: ARGX is a mid-cap high-growth stock; JNJ is a large-cap quality compounder stock. JNJ pays a dividend while ARGX does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.