Specialty Retail
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
ARKO vs SUNS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
REIT - Residential
ARKO vs SUNS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Specialty Retail | REIT - Residential |
| Market Cap | $731M | $103M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $7.64B | $26M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $23M | $12M |
| Gross Margin | 11.8% | 79.9% |
| Operating Margin | 1.4% | 53.4% |
| Forward P/E | 25.1x | 6.6x |
| Total Debt | $3.95B | $122M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $305M | $6M |
ARKO vs SUNS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jul 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Arko Corp. (ARKO) | 100 | 99.5 | -0.5% |
| Sunrise Realty Trus… (SUNS) | 100 | 64.3 | -35.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ARKO vs SUNS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ARKO is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +61.6% vs SUNS's -12.9%
SUNS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.86, yield 15.3%
- Rev growth 148.1%, EPS growth -5.0%
- -10.5% 10Y total return vs ARKO's -29.3%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 148.1% FFO/revenue growth vs ARKO's -12.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (6.6x vs 25.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 46.0% margin vs ARKO's 0.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.86 vs ARKO's 1.14, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 15.3% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs ARKO's 1.8% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +61.6% vs SUNS's -12.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.6% ROA vs ARKO's 0.6%, ROIC 6.0% vs 2.3% |
ARKO vs SUNS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
ARKO vs SUNS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SUNS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ARKO is the larger business by revenue, generating $7.6B annually — 289.8x SUNS's $26M. SUNS is the more profitable business, keeping 46.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ARKO's 0.3%. On growth, SUNS holds the edge at +108.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $7.6B | $26M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $244M | $16M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $23M | $12M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $65M | -$3M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +11.8% | +79.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +1.4% | +53.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +0.3% | +46.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +0.9% | -13.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -9.9% | +108.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +112.0% | -55.6% |
Valuation Metrics
SUNS leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 8.1x trailing earnings, SUNS trades at a 81% valuation discount to ARKO's 43.5x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, SUNS's 12.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than ARKO's 18.5x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $731M | $103M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $4.4B | $219M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 43.47x | 8.12x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 25.08x | 6.58x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 2.69x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 18.49x | 12.93x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.10x | 3.92x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.04x | 0.54x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 11.22x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
SUNS leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SUNS delivers a 6.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $7 in annual profit, vs $6 for ARKO. SUNS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.67x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ARKO's 10.76x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ARKO scores 6/9 vs SUNS's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +6.2% | +6.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.6% | +4.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +2.3% | +6.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +3.3% | +5.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 10.76x | 0.67x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $3.6B | $116M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $305M | $6M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $4.0B | $122M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.31x | 3.53x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
SUNS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SUNS five years ago would be worth $8,945 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6,770 for ARKO. Over the past 12 months, ARKO leads with a +61.6% total return vs SUNS's -12.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SUNS at -3.6% vs ARKO's -5.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +46.5% | -13.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +61.6% | -12.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -14.9% | -10.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -32.3% | -10.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -29.3% | -10.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -5.2% | -3.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — ARKO and SUNS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SUNS is the less volatile stock with a 0.86 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ARKO's 1.14 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ARKO currently trades 92.2% from its 52-week high vs SUNS's 65.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.14x | 0.86x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $7.08 | $11.78 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $3.71 | $7.39 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +92.2% | +65.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 57.5 | 43.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 899K | 104K |
Analyst Outlook
SUNS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates ARKO as "Hold" and SUNS as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 97.8% upside for SUNS (target: $15) vs 16.3% for ARKO (target: $8). For income investors, SUNS offers the higher dividend yield at 15.25% vs ARKO's 1.82%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $7.58 | $15.25 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 4 | 8 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.8% | +15.3% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.12 | $1.18 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +3.8% | 0.0% |
SUNS leads in 5 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Valuation Metrics. 1 category is tied.
ARKO vs SUNS: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ARKO or SUNS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Sunrise Realty Trust, Inc.
(SUNS) is the stronger pick with 148. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -12. 5% for Arko Corp. (ARKO). Sunrise Realty Trust, Inc. (SUNS) offers the better valuation at 8. 1x trailing P/E (6. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Arko Corp. (ARKO) a "Hold" — based on 4 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ARKO or SUNS?
On trailing P/E, Sunrise Realty Trust, Inc.
(SUNS) is the cheapest at 8. 1x versus Arko Corp. at 43. 5x. On forward P/E, Sunrise Realty Trust, Inc. is actually cheaper at 6. 6x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ARKO or SUNS?
Over the past 5 years, Sunrise Realty Trust, Inc.
(SUNS) delivered a total return of -10. 5%, compared to -32. 3% for Arko Corp. (ARKO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SUNS returned -10. 5% versus ARKO's -29. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ARKO or SUNS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Sunrise Realty Trust, Inc.
(SUNS) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 86β versus Arko Corp. 's 1. 14β — meaning ARKO is approximately 32% more volatile than SUNS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Sunrise Realty Trust, Inc. (SUNS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 67% versus 11% for Arko Corp. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ARKO or SUNS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Sunrise Realty Trust, Inc.
(SUNS) is pulling ahead at 148. 1% versus -12. 5% for Arko Corp. (ARKO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Arko Corp. grew EPS 15. 4% year-over-year, compared to -5. 0% for Sunrise Realty Trust, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ARKO or SUNS?
Sunrise Realty Trust, Inc.
(SUNS) is the more profitable company, earning 46. 0% net margin versus 0. 3% for Arko Corp. — meaning it keeps 46. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SUNS leads at 64. 2% versus 1. 3% for ARKO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SUNS leads at 90. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ARKO or SUNS more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Sunrise Realty Trust, Inc.
(SUNS) trades at 6. 6x forward P/E versus 25. 1x for Arko Corp. — 18. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SUNS: 97. 8% to $15. 25.
08Which pays a better dividend — ARKO or SUNS?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Sunrise Realty Trust, Inc. (SUNS) offers the highest yield at 15. 3%, versus 1. 8% for Arko Corp. (ARKO).
09Is ARKO or SUNS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Sunrise Realty Trust, Inc.
(SUNS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 86), 15. 3% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (SUNS: -10. 5%, ARKO: -29. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ARKO and SUNS?
These companies operate in different sectors (ARKO (Consumer Cyclical) and SUNS (Real Estate)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: ARKO is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SUNS is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.