Security & Protection Services
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
ARLO vs SONO
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Consumer Electronics
ARLO vs SONO — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Security & Protection Services | Consumer Electronics |
| Market Cap | $1.53B | $1.78B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $529M | $1.46B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $15M | $-41M |
| Gross Margin | 44.0% | 44.8% |
| Operating Margin | 1.1% | 2.0% |
| Forward P/E | 18.1x | 46.9x |
| Total Debt | $7M | $60M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $146M | $175M |
ARLO vs SONO — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Arlo Technologies, … (ARLO) | 100 | 659.3 | +559.3% |
| Sonos, Inc. (SONO) | 100 | 135.9 | +35.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ARLO vs SONO
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ARLO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 1.48
- Rev growth 3.6%, EPS growth 145.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 2.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.48, Low D/E 5.3%, current ratio 1.51x
SONO is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- -25.9% 10Y total return vs ARLO's -34.1%
- +60.6% vs ARLO's +40.9%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 3.6% revenue growth vs SONO's -4.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (18.1x vs 46.9x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 2.8% margin vs SONO's -2.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.48 vs SONO's 1.75, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +60.6% vs ARLO's +40.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.8% ROA vs SONO's -4.8%, ROIC 35.9% vs -13.4% |
ARLO vs SONO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
ARLO vs SONO — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ARLO leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SONO is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.5B annually — 2.8x ARLO's $529M. ARLO is the more profitable business, keeping 2.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SONO's -2.8%. On growth, ARLO holds the edge at +16.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $529M | $1.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $9M | $61M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $15M | -$41M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $67M | $118M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +44.0% | +44.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +1.1% | +2.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +2.8% | -2.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +12.6% | +8.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +16.2% | +8.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.0% | -29.3% |
Valuation Metrics
SONO leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, SONO's 140.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than ARLO's 229.1x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.5B | $1.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.4B | $1.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 104.07x | -28.94x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 18.10x | 46.86x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 229.06x | 140.81x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.89x | 1.24x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 12.55x | 5.02x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 22.88x | 16.49x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ARLO leads this category, winning 8 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ARLO delivers a 11.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $12 in annual profit, vs $-10 for SONO. ARLO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.05x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SONO's 0.17x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ARLO scores 7/9 vs SONO's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +11.7% | -10.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +4.8% | -4.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +35.9% | -13.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +4.7% | -9.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.05x | 0.17x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$140M | -$115M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $146M | $175M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $7M | $60M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 2587.88x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ARLO leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ARLO five years ago would be worth $22,519 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,927 for SONO. Over the past 12 months, SONO leads with a +60.6% total return vs ARLO's +40.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ARLO at 28.4% vs SONO's -12.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +10.1% | -15.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +40.9% | +60.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +111.5% | -32.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +125.2% | -60.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -34.1% | -25.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +28.4% | -12.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — ARLO and SONO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ARLO is the less volatile stock with a 1.48 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SONO's 1.75 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.48x | 1.75x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $19.94 | $19.82 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $10.00 | $8.73 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +73.1% | +74.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 56.3 | 46.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.3M | 1.3M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates ARLO as "Buy" and SONO as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 32.1% upside for SONO (target: $20) vs 20.1% for ARLO (target: $18).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $17.50 | $19.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 10 | 9 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +3.0% | +4.5% |
ARLO leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). SONO leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
ARLO vs SONO: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ARLO or SONO a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Arlo Technologies, Inc.
(ARLO) is the stronger pick with 3. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -4. 9% for Sonos, Inc. (SONO). Arlo Technologies, Inc. (ARLO) offers the better valuation at 104. 1x trailing P/E (18. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Arlo Technologies, Inc. (ARLO) a "Buy" — based on 10 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ARLO or SONO?
On forward P/E, Arlo Technologies, Inc.
is actually cheaper at 18. 1x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ARLO or SONO?
Over the past 5 years, Arlo Technologies, Inc.
(ARLO) delivered a total return of +125. 2%, compared to -60. 7% for Sonos, Inc. (SONO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SONO returned -25. 9% versus ARLO's -34. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ARLO or SONO?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Arlo Technologies, Inc.
(ARLO) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 48β versus Sonos, Inc. 's 1. 75β — meaning SONO is approximately 18% more volatile than ARLO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Arlo Technologies, Inc. (ARLO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 5% versus 17% for Sonos, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ARLO or SONO?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Arlo Technologies, Inc.
(ARLO) is pulling ahead at 3. 6% versus -4. 9% for Sonos, Inc. (SONO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Arlo Technologies, Inc. grew EPS 145. 2% year-over-year, compared to -64. 5% for Sonos, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ARLO leads at 2. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ARLO or SONO?
Arlo Technologies, Inc.
(ARLO) is the more profitable company, earning 2. 8% net margin versus -4. 2% for Sonos, Inc. — meaning it keeps 2. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ARLO leads at 1. 1% versus -3. 5% for SONO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ARLO leads at 44. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ARLO or SONO more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Arlo Technologies, Inc.
(ARLO) trades at 18. 1x forward P/E versus 46. 9x for Sonos, Inc. — 28. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SONO: 32. 1% to $19. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — ARLO or SONO?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is ARLO or SONO better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Arlo Technologies, Inc.
(ARLO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding. Sonos, Inc. (SONO) carries a higher beta of 1. 75 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ARLO: -34. 1%, SONO: -25. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ARLO and SONO?
These companies operate in different sectors (ARLO (Industrials) and SONO (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.