Oil & Gas Equipment & Services
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
AROC vs USAC vs DNOW vs NFGC vs PUMP
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Oil & Gas Equipment & Services
Oil & Gas Equipment & Services
Gold
Oil & Gas Equipment & Services
AROC vs USAC vs DNOW vs NFGC vs PUMP — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Oil & Gas Equipment & Services | Oil & Gas Equipment & Services | Oil & Gas Equipment & Services | Gold | Oil & Gas Equipment & Services |
| Market Cap | $6.68B | $3.33B | $1.54B | $726M | $1.91B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.52B | $1.08B | $3.40B | $0.00 | $1.18B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $325M | $129M | $-141M | $-46M | $-12M |
| Gross Margin | 45.5% | 51.6% | 15.6% | — | 8.3% |
| Operating Margin | 25.2% | 30.4% | -2.5% | — | -1.1% |
| Forward P/E | 19.3x | 19.8x | 20.7x | 14.5x | 1993.6x |
| Total Debt | $2.42B | $2.55B | $669M | $123K | $249M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $2M | $9M | $164M | $22M | $91M |
AROC vs USAC vs DNOW vs NFGC vs PUMP — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Sep 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Archrock, Inc. (AROC) | 100 | 708.4 | +608.4% |
| USA Compression Par… (USAC) | 100 | 275.8 | +175.8% |
| Dnow Inc. (DNOW) | 100 | 287.9 | +187.9% |
| New Found Gold Corp. (NFGC) | 100 | 124.6 | +24.6% |
| ProPetro Holding Co… (PUMP) | 100 | 383.0 | +283.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: AROC vs USAC vs DNOW vs NFGC vs PUMP
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
AROC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 28.7%, EPS growth 75.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 20.8%
- 5.8% 10Y total return vs USAC's 250.5%
- 28.7% revenue growth vs PUMP's -12.1%
- 21.4% margin vs DNOW's -4.1%
USAC is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and defensive is your priority.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.38, yield 7.6%
- Beta 0.38, yield 7.6%, current ratio 1.27x
- Beta 0.38 vs NFGC's 1.18
DNOW is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.83, Low D/E 29.9%, current ratio 2.34x
NFGC ranks third and is worth considering specifically for value.
- Lower P/E (14.5x vs 1993.6x)
PUMP is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +201.4% vs DNOW's -10.8%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 28.7% revenue growth vs PUMP's -12.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (14.5x vs 1993.6x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 21.4% margin vs DNOW's -4.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.38 vs NFGC's 1.18 | |
| Dividends | 2.1% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs USAC's 7.6%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +201.4% vs DNOW's -10.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 7.4% ROA vs NFGC's -49.7%, ROIC 11.6% vs -161.1% |
AROC vs USAC vs DNOW vs NFGC vs PUMP — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
AROC vs USAC vs DNOW vs NFGC vs PUMP — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
USAC leads in 2 of 6 categories
AROC leads 2 • DNOW leads 1 • NFGC leads 0 • PUMP leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
USAC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
DNOW and NFGC operate at a comparable scale, with $3.4B and $0 in trailing revenue. AROC is the more profitable business, keeping 21.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to DNOW's -4.1%. On growth, DNOW holds the edge at +97.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.5B | $1.1B | $3.4B | $0 | $1.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $789M | $631M | -$44M | -$55M | $154M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $325M | $129M | -$141M | -$46M | -$12M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $358M | $327M | $53M | -$54M | -$11M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +45.5% | +51.6% | +15.6% | — | +8.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +25.2% | +30.4% | -2.5% | — | -1.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +21.4% | +11.9% | -4.1% | — | -1.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +23.6% | +30.1% | +1.6% | — | -0.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +7.7% | +35.1% | +97.5% | — | -24.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.5% | +92.9% | -2.2% | +5.6% | -134.2% |
Valuation Metrics
DNOW leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 20.7x trailing earnings, AROC trades at a 99% valuation discount to PUMP's 1993.6x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, USAC's 9.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than AROC's 10.9x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $6.7B | $3.3B | $1.5B | $726M | $1.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $9.1B | $5.9B | $2.0B | $710M | $2.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 20.71x | 32.48x | -17.43x | -11.07x | 1993.59x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 19.26x | 19.81x | 20.66x | 14.51x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 10.87x | 9.75x | — | — | 10.67x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.48x | 3.34x | 0.55x | — | 1.50x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 4.47x | — | 0.69x | 8.39x | 1.98x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 55.82x | 12.04x | 11.50x | — | 44.88x |
Profitability & Efficiency
AROC leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
USAC delivers a 6.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $7 in annual profit, vs $-58 for NFGC. NFGC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to AROC's 1.62x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AROC scores 7/9 vs NFGC's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +22.3% | +6.5% | -8.4% | -57.7% | -1.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +7.4% | +4.4% | -5.0% | -49.7% | -1.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +11.6% | +9.6% | -3.3% | -161.1% | +1.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +14.8% | +12.8% | -3.9% | -91.2% | +1.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.62x | — | 0.30x | 0.00x | 0.30x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $2.4B | $2.5B | $505M | -$22M | $158M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $2M | $9M | $164M | $22M | $91M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2.4B | $2.6B | $669M | $123,103 | $249M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.81x | 1.77x | — | -2380.11x | -0.86x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
AROC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in AROC five years ago would be worth $42,706 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,034 for NFGC. Over the past 12 months, PUMP leads with a +201.4% total return vs DNOW's -10.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AROC at 60.3% vs NFGC's -24.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +43.9% | +20.5% | -2.2% | -30.4% | +58.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +62.5% | +28.6% | -10.8% | +75.8% | +201.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +312.1% | +72.7% | +38.3% | -57.2% | +132.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +327.1% | +147.8% | +13.4% | -69.7% | +41.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +577.9% | +250.5% | -22.8% | +13.0% | +7.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +60.3% | +20.0% | +11.4% | -24.6% | +32.5% |
Risk & Volatility
USAC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
USAC is the less volatile stock with a 0.38 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NFGC's 1.18 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. USAC currently trades 95.5% from its 52-week high vs NFGC's 58.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.91x | 0.38x | 0.83x | 1.18x | 1.12x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $40.12 | $28.90 | $17.26 | $3.59 | $18.50 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $21.17 | $21.85 | $10.94 | $1.09 | $4.51 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +95.0% | +95.5% | +75.7% | +58.8% | +84.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 66.8 | 47.2 | 68.2 | 52.1 | 51.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.6M | 189K | 3.2M | 2.0M | 3.5M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — AROC and USAC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: AROC as "Buy", USAC as "Buy", DNOW as "Buy", NFGC as "Buy", PUMP as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 30.1% upside for DNOW (target: $17) vs -5.1% for PUMP (target: $15). For income investors, USAC offers the higher dividend yield at 7.59% vs AROC's 2.13%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $40.00 | $27.50 | $17.00 | — | $14.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 18 | 19 | 16 | 1 | 30 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.1% | +7.6% | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 4 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.81 | $2.10 | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.1% | 0.0% | +2.4% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
USAC leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Risk & Volatility). AROC leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). 1 tied.
AROC vs USAC vs DNOW vs NFGC vs PUMP: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is AROC or USAC or DNOW or NFGC or PUMP a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Archrock, Inc.
(AROC) is the stronger pick with 28. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -12. 1% for ProPetro Holding Corp. (PUMP). Archrock, Inc. (AROC) offers the better valuation at 20. 7x trailing P/E (19. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Archrock, Inc. (AROC) a "Buy" — based on 18 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — AROC or USAC or DNOW or NFGC or PUMP?
On trailing P/E, Archrock, Inc.
(AROC) is the cheapest at 20. 7x versus ProPetro Holding Corp. at 1993. 6x. On forward P/E, New Found Gold Corp. is actually cheaper at 14. 5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — AROC or USAC or DNOW or NFGC or PUMP?
Over the past 5 years, Archrock, Inc.
(AROC) delivered a total return of +327. 1%, compared to -69. 7% for New Found Gold Corp. (NFGC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AROC returned +577. 9% versus DNOW's -22. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — AROC or USAC or DNOW or NFGC or PUMP?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), USA Compression Partners, LP (USAC) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
38β versus New Found Gold Corp. 's 1. 18β — meaning NFGC is approximately 212% more volatile than USAC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, New Found Gold Corp. (NFGC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 162% for Archrock, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — AROC or USAC or DNOW or NFGC or PUMP?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Archrock, Inc.
(AROC) is pulling ahead at 28. 7% versus -12. 1% for ProPetro Holding Corp. (PUMP). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: ProPetro Holding Corp. grew EPS 100. 6% year-over-year, compared to -200. 0% for Dnow Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, AROC leads at 20. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — AROC or USAC or DNOW or NFGC or PUMP?
Archrock, Inc.
(AROC) is the more profitable company, earning 21. 6% net margin versus -3. 2% for Dnow Inc. — meaning it keeps 21. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AROC leads at 38. 7% versus -2. 9% for DNOW. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AROC leads at 48. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is AROC or USAC or DNOW or NFGC or PUMP more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, New Found Gold Corp.
(NFGC) trades at 14. 5x forward P/E versus 20. 7x for Dnow Inc. — 6. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for DNOW: 30. 1% to $17. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — AROC or USAC or DNOW or NFGC or PUMP?
In this comparison, USAC (7.
6% yield), AROC (2. 1% yield) pay a dividend. DNOW, NFGC, PUMP do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is AROC or USAC or DNOW or NFGC or PUMP better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, USA Compression Partners, LP (USAC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
38), 7. 6% yield, +250. 5% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (USAC: +250. 5%, NFGC: +13. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between AROC and USAC and DNOW and NFGC and PUMP?
These companies operate in different sectors (AROC (Energy) and USAC (Energy) and DNOW (Energy) and NFGC (Basic Materials) and PUMP (Energy)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: AROC is a small-cap high-growth stock; USAC is a small-cap income-oriented stock; DNOW is a small-cap high-growth stock; NFGC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PUMP is a small-cap quality compounder stock. AROC, USAC pay a dividend while DNOW, NFGC, PUMP do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.